The mathematics of artificial intelligence.

Im-pli-cate. To be enfolded (unexpressed).

Ex-pli-cate. To be unfolded (expressed)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicate_and_explicate_order

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes. Like in-hale or ex-hale.

The prefix "in-" indicates a negative. Not to be confused with "with-in."

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Where did I use the prefix "in- ? I used the prefix "im- which does mean with-in. look it up.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I believe they are the same prefix. It depends on what letter the verb begins with as to which one you use.

 

well, yes and no. But there is no word "inplicate",

"implicate"

whereas,

"explicate"

 

Explicate?

 

Use you dictionary.

 

I meant explicit.

 

Origin

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

early 17th century (as an adjective): from French explicite or Latin explicitus, past participle of explicare "unfold" (see explicate).

 

I'm not involved in this thread and really don't like to be

But I am happy to see my immaganary friend Humpty Dumpty seems to be getting involved

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Unfortunately you don't seem to consult your dictionary either.

???????

 

Late night dyslexia immaganary word

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I understand and usually overlook typos. But when you speak of Humpty Dumpty , it is preferable to use correct spelling, else people might get the impression that Humpty Dumpty is the extent of your education in literature.

I really like to give you more credit than that. In fact, Humpty Dumpty was one of Carlin's favorite stories.
and he was an astute observer of language and its tortured misuse in common conversations. Of course he used those examples for their deeper and more profound underlying philosophical messages contained in those children's stories.
Similar to the little children's song of "Ring around the Rosy", which actually has a macabre history associated with that seemingly innocent children's song and dance.

 

Michel, you've been mansplained.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Well, the casual use of Humpty Dumpty in the conversation seemed a little inappropriate.

 

I know and I'm sobbing my heart out here that someone can pick on another's disability in such a manner

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Extra Poes for the above

My dyslexia is in the main part restricted to names

My spelling is atrocious which is why I enjoy the intuitive spell checker I have on this phone which also learns my frequently used text sometimes suggesting a whole sentence

But even such a system cannot overcome my spelling failures

Which leads me to my back up system

If I had spotted immaganary I would have Googled it and obtained imaginary

Not to worry

On the same day I was on the front page of the NT News (large photo small story)

and also won 2 tickets to the movies

Sometimes the Universe can be kind to the afflicted

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Nothing casual about it

It was deliberate

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I know, hence the gentle retort.

 

by dividing by zero, of course.

Building what is suggested (a "symbolic logic" form of Artificial Intelligence) means that it will need to deal with Turing's HALTING PROBLEM whenever symbols and operations combine to produce something insoluable (like a division by zero).

This is why most Artificial Intelligence researchers have instead adopted a behavioral approach, because it is much less prone to errors like Turing's halting problem that frequently beset Artificial Intelligence engines of the symbolic logic camp.

 

It was used metaphorically. But if I wanted to be argumentative, I could ask how do atoms and a program become a biological species?

But according to the Free Dictionary, the word species is used in several other contexts than biology.

If look up the full definition of "species" (and it's derivatives), you may even find a definition which pertains to your religious views, such as

 

To your last statement , obviously in bold , what are you on about?