posts removed without explanation

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by SimonsCat, Jan 29, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SimonsCat Registered Member

    Messages:
    213
    Why are posts moved in the forums without a moderator explanation? Take this post for example:

    http://www.sciforums.com/threads/avoiding-the-big-squeeze.158744/

    This was a recited work from the current work on Planck Stars, yet... some moderator has took it upon themselves to move this post into pseudoscience, so its quite clear an unqualified moderator is moving posts to irrelevant subforums without explanation.

    Why?
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,502
    The mail may be running late.
    I have always received a message from the mods when something happens with a thread.
    Give it a little time they may be busy.
    Alex
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. SimonsCat Registered Member

    Messages:
    213
    Nope nothing.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    Maybe they just thought it was clearly pseudoscience?
     
  8. rpenner Fully Wired Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,833
    Also, SimonsCat has no right to post on this forum, so why bother explaining anything when he doesn't understand that.
     
    origin and exchemist like this.
  9. origin Heading towards oblivion Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    11,888
    It wasn't recited it was essentially copied from this.

    You do know plagiarism is against the site rules...
     
  10. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,451
    Well, Reiku has just been banned again, it seems.

    Well done Mods.

    Hmm .........................it's been a while since we heard from Gaiagirl. Must be time for more exploding thymus glands, surely?
     
    origin likes this.
  11. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    I just got a post of mine removed from the "whistling in your ears" thread in the parapsychology forum. I explained that someone DID accuse the poster of the thread of schizophrenia based on their tinnitus and my saying they did is therefore NOT trolling. I was banned for two weeks on that lying charge. Now my post has disappeared without explanation. Sounds like someone's covering their ass..
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2017
  12. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    The post that was removed contributed nothing to the thread but a continuation of your attempted attack on another member, which was why you were banned in the first place.

    You have been told, time and time again, that instead of bitching about moderator action in the public forums, you are to take it up with the administration.

    http://sciforums.com/threads/sciforums-site-rules.142880/
    The fact that you continue to post these gripes in public (regardless of who the moderator in question is, and in fact you complain about EVERY moderator action taken when you are involved) could lead one to believe you are doing it simply to troll or otherwise be a burden on the site.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  13. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    Hey, this isn't a democracy here. You don't like the rules, go elsewhere.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  14. Magical Realist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,608
    • When one cites the rules to you, it is generally a bad idea to follow up by immediately violating them again.
    I have the right to defend myself publically from your lying charges to the extent that you make your charges public. And now everyone knows about it and the bullshit you pulled. I'm content.
     
  15. Oystein Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    890
    Magical Realist, you should move on to another forum. A non-science forum where the dummies will think you're a genius. Not.
     
    exchemist likes this.
  16. Kittamaru Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. Adieu, Sciforums. Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,938
    On that note... I think this thread served its original purpose, and now leaving it open will only serve as flamebait.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page