David Lapoint , Di-Electric Universe, Plasma, Primer Fields

Only that you indulge in conspiracy, paranormal, supernatural, unsupported, pseudoscientific trollish nonsense.
That maybe OK for this thread river, but as you have been requested earleir, please keep your mythical musings and nonsense out of the sciences.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

This is for you River...
You may know of it if you are a thunderbolts fan...
http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=9210

I am having a look at one video shortly but I tell you if it does not grab me early I won't waste my credit on it.

Anyways he does not seem electric universe related.

Alex

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I started and sorry I miss the point.

I lost interest and went to funny cat videos.

What is he on about..he talks about vacuum etc and how we find domes in the real world but losses the vacuum.

River you are rewatching did you get anything out of it.

Why are cats so funny.

Alex

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Congratulations! I am delighted to see this thread is being treated with the seriousness it deserves.

 

Hmmm....you say that without watching any of David's videos.

You are making a judgement of which you and your cronies know nothing about .

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

A judgement? certainly, a judgement based on observational fact!
You are renowned and known for indulging in conspiracy, paranormal, supernatural, and unsupported, pseudoscientific nonsense.

 

Thats it pad ? , no intelligent comment on David's theory and experiments .

 

Tell me, who is David LaPoint? What are his credentials?
Is this his real name? Because so far all I have found points to him being a quack...But then again, so was that other fella you raised the other day...you know the one who claims there was a Nuclear war on Mars between Aliens.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Agreed!

 

comment on David's theory and experiments .

Watch the video , pad .

Make up your own mind . assuming you have one .

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You smarting over something river?

Let me make it clear again......
You tell me who this turkey is, tell me what his credentials are, what expertise he has, and I'll watch the video.
But obviously I'm not sacrificing an hour of my time, watching some video on u tube, recommended by a known gullible, impressionable, non scientific member, who is know for the nonsense he continually infests this forum with.

 

https://www.quora.com/Has-anyone-considered-the-primer-fields-as-a-solid-theory


Jeremy Garrett, master's degree in physics, https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremy-garrett-b6665a97
Written Sat

What I found in a quick search suggests that it is not being taken very seriously. There are always a significant number of people who claim to have discovered something new about magnetic fields and/or ways to get limitless energy using magnets. A solid education in physics is a good way to understand what makes a theory an strong one or only an interesting one. Many of the claims of “new discoveries” are misunderstandings, many of the others are things that are only new to that particular scientist but which have been understood by other scientists for some time. A good guide for those outside of the particular specialty is this, “If it seems to good to be true, then it probably is.” That adage applies nicely to the “cold fusion” “discovery” from three decades ago that made front-page news all over the world. It also applies nicely to the “discovery” of cellphones causing cancer — someone with a single year of college physics or chemistry can thoroughly explain what cellphones can’t cause cancer.

 

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread921117/pg21
from the video:
photon is concentration of energy, made up of many concentrations of energy, which are made of many concentrations of energy.....
Translation:
The Primer Field "Theory" is a bunch of nonsense, which is made of nonsense and supported by nonsense.

In the last few days, I have been doing quite a bit of research on David and his theory.
To try and answer your concerns about his identity, everything I can find suggests that he "just popped up" In 2008 when he filed for patent (www.google.com...) then only just recently (Jan, 2013) when all of this started.
Here's my theory.
If most, all, or even ANY of this is correct, then I can most certainly imagine a "whole bunch" of conspiracy theory type things that could possibly go on. Not one of which leave Mr. LaPoint in too good of shape at the end. (I'm guessing that the Federal Govt. saw this too.
Because of this, I'm sure that the "David LaPoint" that we're getting to know is actually "Fredrichheimer Neussenbaum" of Suffolk, NJ

(That was a joke!)
Seriously though.
Nobody just "popps up" in the world of social media anymore. It just doesn't happen.
There's one other thing that lends credibility to all of this, (including the lack of credentials) and that is that I ALSO can not find any previous writings, publications, or even discussions related to ANY of this at all, EVER.
Nobody has mentioned it over the years of his research, similar theory's, etc.
AGAIN! Theory's like this do not just "come to you" without 1. Asking others questions. 2. Searching for supporting/defeating information. 3. Discussing or arguing topics related to the field with "SOMEONE"
Since this started, David has spoken on Youtube (comments) and on F/B quite a bit. He seems to not have any real "shyness" issues. In fact, the times he has spoken, he gets right into it and even claims occasionally that he needs to quit talking and "get back to work."
AGAIN. Sounds as if someone (???) has gone and cleaned up after him. (I. erased him, created David.
Now. I know all of this COULD be reasons for someone to disbelieve all of this, (yea right-He's from some kind of movie! ) OR... one could even think..."Hey. perhaps the government sees some real promise to all of this and is doing what they can to protect him.

 

Yes I also had a quick look and the striking thing is that this person has appeared from nowhere, with no publicly known history at all.

He's obviously an idiot, though. I found this: http://rexresearch.com/lapoint/lapoint.htm
which purports to be an explanation of his "Primer Fields". However it starts with photos and a rambling and ungrammatical discussion of some electrical discharges, in some apparatus that is not properly described. It then proceeds to a few half-arsed speculations which do not seem to be anchored in any kind of science, inexplicably followed by the text of a crackpot patent application for power generation. It seems to involve magnets (though, strangely, for a magnet nut, he does not seem to invoke Tesla, so far as I can see).

The web page is however full of links......to YouTube videos.

In short, just the sort of silly thing to appeal to the likes of river and MR

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

.

 

There is a hallmark of crankage here.

He posts pictures (from Google images) that are superficially shaped like objects in his setup - the dumbbell nebula, a graphic of field lines around a galaxy - as if shape equals common cause.




Here's my theory: the Earth is superficially the same shape as an orange. Perhaps the Earth's formation was fruit-like - grown on a tree.

To coin LaPointe: "If this were proven to be fact, large portions of our physics platform would have to be restructured... "

 

Arf, arf.

But maybe we shouldn't mock the afphfphfphlicted.

 

So David's theory went against the massstream and you call him an idiot .

I call his theory brillant and brave .

Did any of watch any of the videos right through ? I doubt it .

Or all three ?

 

And what is that theory, as you understand it Riv?
As elsewhere, this is not your video blog; this a discussion board.

Lay out your topic of discussion.

Sci Fo rules:
Support your arguments with evidence.
Do not expect members to do your homework for you.
Banning risk: Spamming or advertising.

 

The Topic is about magnetic fields shape and the affect on plasmas and the consequence therefore on sub-atomic particles to galaxies . their subsequent behavior.

I have with the Red Square Nebula

 

Hi River,
Can you perhaps put the theory in your words and show how it has influence upon the Red Square Nebula. I am not trying to discredit the man or his idea I unfortunately dont understand what he is really trying to say. Probably me and thats why I would appreciate you explaining the idea and seeing the Red Square Nebula can be used onCE i understand I can consider other nebula and see if we find similar.
Alex