Family catches Bigfoot on camera (Calgary Alberta Canada)

Where's your evidence for that? Did you submit all the thousands of eyewitnesses of bigfoot with gullibility tests? Whatever the hell that is..

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It's also possible the photos and videos and stories are real. So you have asserted nothing. Why are you even arguing if you have no evidence for your position?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Agreed, nothing is asserted: Many options are open. I do not accept the big hairy guy option.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Sure, it's possible the photos are real, but there's no evidence to suggest that they are real, and a whole lot of stuff to suggest that they're not real.

 

The photos and videos and accounts are evidence that bigfoot is real. If you are claiming those are not real or faked, you need to support that with evidence. And obviously you have none.

 

Show me a dinky di non blurry, non fuzzy close up photo of any big hairy guy in the bush.
How do they produce?
Why are they not seen by many people, other than the few.
Please realise that most of Australia's animals are nocturnal, but we have evidence for all of them.
No, again, the option of some big hairy guy you want to call Bigfoot from the fragile evidence, is slim at best, and certainly not conclusive at worst.

 

No, they're not. They're not good enough because they might be faked.

Do you understand the concept that because something might be fake, it can't be trusted - ESPECIALLY if you're trying to convince the world that alien spaceships, ghosts, or bigfoot are real with no tangible evidence to back up those claims?

 

Prove it.

Do you understand that just because evidence can be faked doesn't mean it isn't reliable. DNA evidence can be faked in murder trials. But it's still reliable evidence.

 

Not when it comes to proving the existence of some mythical creature. Things that can be faked can not be trusted. Unless you have actual DNA evidence?

 

Do you know what else murder trials have?

Bodies.

 

Daecon, my best suggestion would be simply "don't feed the troll"... he has made it apparent he does not want actual discussion on this, just vapid acceptance, so save yourself the heartache and just move on

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

That's one of the more common ways of discovering new species, especially of larger animals - they, or pieces of them, show up dead in a bushmeat market, on the road, washed up on the beach, etc.

http://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.2637.1.1
https://news.mongabay.com/2013/08/scientists-discover-new-flying-mammal-in-bushmeat-market/
http://mysteriousuniverse.org/2016/...l-discoveries-that-were-made-at-food-markets/
http://www.esf.edu/top10/2011/06.htm
http://yaledailynews.com/blog/2012/10/04/new-species-of-monkey-found-in-congo/

 

Mod Hat ― Closure

This thread is closed, owing to intellectual dishonesty.

Note to members: Don't troll with debunked evidence. Don't troll at all, ideally, according to the rules, but if you're using debunked "evidence" to do so, well, that only makes it worse.

For instance 2012 presentation was unscientific; the story has been debunked as bad science, and interested advocates have had well over three years to perform their due diligence. We simply do not believe there is no way an allegedly passionate and informed advocate could be ignorant of certain circumstances; this is one of those occasions.

• KNHarpe. "The real Sasquatch genome scandal". So Much Science, So Little Time. 13 January 2014. SoSoScienceDotCom1.WordPress.com. 11 October 2016. http://bit.ly/2dIt38v

• Timmer, John. "How the attempt to sequence 'Bigfoot's genome' went badly off track". Ars Technica. 7 July 2013. ArsTechnica.com. 11 October 2013. http://bit.ly/2dIITE2 ​