Gravitational waves from black hole merger

Then answer what is the charge negation time ...that quickie time ? and spin negation time...that normal time ?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I don't succumb to bullying demands and false claims by cranks.
Your questions have all been answered in this thread.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Read : I do not know, because i could not search it by googling......Thats Paddoboy for all.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I did read.....
You said.......

Now google again...If that doesn't help, E-Mail one of the professional experts...easy peasy!

 

You are claiming this quickiee and you are not able to support that.....so you are resorting to nonsense...as usual Paddoboyish cop out.

 

No, it's actually your nonsense. I have given links supporting that fact...Professor Hamilton for one.
Let me state it again: A BH can have three properties: Mass, spin, and charge:
Charge and spin are negated over time. Even mass, according to Hawking Radiation will see a BH evaporate over the lifetime of the Universe.

If you want to argue against mainstream cosmology, then submit some reference please.

 

This is much better...
You qualified this with some 'quickly' etc...
Good, you learnt.

 

??? Wow! Such arrogant pedant.
Let me then rephrase.......charge is negated over time, rather quickly, and spin over larger time frames.......
But again you omit any reputable links to support any of your unsupported nonsense.

 

Can you quantify this 'rather quickly' ?

 

Do I need to? Isn't this just another effort by you to attempt to gloss over all that which you have previously denied, and all that you claim but as yet have never been able to verify with suitable reputable links.
Quite an extensive list in actual fact.
I mean, you aren't naive enough surely to pretend that we should take any notice of your unsupported claims?

The "rather quickly" is aptly addressed in a previous post: I'll let you do the searching.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

The God,

It seems you don't have any further reply to my post #406.

 

Yes, well thats what he said that this conversion should not be restricted to EMR..

But I have another question in this Gravitational Radiation thing, I am also searching, Did the baryonic number remain conserved in this loss of 3 Solar Mass ?

 

The process is time consuming, expensive and leaves at least this Moderator drained of the will to exert even the least bit of human sympathy. But the process continues and justice will come.

 

I haven't read the whole thread, sorry if you been over this already.

If we are at a greater radial distance with respect to the 2 BH's that merged then the gravitational attract should remain the same to that general direction of space. We have always been attracted to the barycenter of the BH's before they merged with the same attraction after they merged, unless their mass changed.

There should be no change in our detected gravity before or after the merge from that region.

what am I missing here?

 

First of all the gravitation detected from the black holes before or after the merger is 0.

 

????? Black hole have, of course, a non-zero gravitational field.

There will be no big change before and after (only minor losses because of gravitational radiation), so "is the same" or "has a difference 0" would be ok.

 

His question was, would there be a difference in the amount of gravity we detected here on earth before and after the black holes merged. We of course could not detect any gravity from black holes 1.3 billion miles away.

 

In what plane would these " gravitational waves manifest " ?

 

The same plane that the Lense -Thirring effect and gravity itself manifests itself in I suggest...undulations in spacetime.
You do know what gravitational waves are?

 

It's been awhile pad ; update me.