why we need ghosts

I never said paranormal is an exception to all those *subjective* emotions and experiences. Imagination can indeed break universal laws, but that does not make them universal reality, it makes them is *personal* reality.
I anticipated this and that's why I suggested you also include the psychology of *subjective* experience in your new definition.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

LOL! You're a spastic mess. Move along dearie. I'm not interested in your backpeddlings.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No, but your ignorance also does not give you the authority to define what is real.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Well, I constantly have to wait for you to catch up, dearie.

 

LOL! Ignorance of what? I've studied the evidence of the paranormal for 14 years. How long have you been studying it? Never...

 

So, you are claiming to be an authority in ghosts and have the evidence to prove it. I say, you know as much about ghosts as I do and because I am an athority in photography I probably know more about (unexplained) phenomena in pictures than you.
It comes down to ; You are making the extraordinary claim, the burden of verifiable proof is on you. Not me.
What you are talking about is Tulpas, and that is a whole different issue.

 

I've provided quite a bit of evidence so far. If you are making the claim the evidence isn't real, then you need to back up that claim. Why are these photos not of real phenomena? Why did the rescuers hear the voice of that women from inside the submerged car? What was the motive to lie for a man who walks us thru his whole building relating paranormal experiences? Stuff like that..

Well la dee da! Aren't you special! lol!

 

I have a drawing of a Unicorn made with crayons and glitter glue.

This proves Unicorns are real.

 

And so you have no clue as to the distinction between drawings and photographs. Why am I not surprised?

 

Yeah, because it's impossible to fake a photograph, right?

 

No..but if you claim it is faked, you need to support that claim. Not just make up some shit about it being fake and leaving it at that.

 

Nope. Doesn't work like that. The burden of proof is one the one claiming the photo is genuine, not the one disbelieving the claim.

 

Nope..I provided the evidence. If you claim the evidence isn't real, you need to back it up. Show me why it isn't a real photo. But you can't do that, can you? Why you don't stick to claiming things you can actually prove?

 

Why don't you stick to providing actual proof?

Oh wait, you've never done that to begin with.

 

I provide evidence as I always have. If you want proofs, consult a math book.

 

I used my radioactive high frequency discombulator. How else would I know this?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!