It's rather frustrating that you have taken it upon yourselves to close my threads before they even get a good start. It's unfortunate that you can't let me reply to those who respond to the OP. I try to make a point of presenting my opinions in my own threads; thereby not disrupting the conversations in other threads.
Really? REALLY? "Unnatural and obscene", they "know it's wrong" and they can never have a "normal" relationship? And you think that isn't hate speech?
Bowser: I have seen two threads of your closed in recent times. The first was closed for hate speech. The second was your complaint about the closure of that thread, that compared the moderator closing it to the Nazis. Now this one is just a continuation of the same complaint, is it not? Are there other threads of yours that have been closed that I am unaware of? Is there really a pattern here, or is this really about one closure? I have commented on your homophobic thread in one of the two closed threads.
Bowser has become that which he despises. As you reflect Bowser, you will enter into infinite curiosity that transcends understanding. Faith healing may be the solution to what’s holding you back from a colossal quantum leap of chi. Through prayer, our dreams are engulfed in non-locality.
I think that you despise the turbulence that is the antithesis of aspiration. Where there is delusion, learning cannot thrive. You may be ruled by dogma without realizing it. Do not let it shatter the truth of your circuit.
Dogma has many forms. Pick and choose the one that best aligns with your beliefs. As for aspiration, I have no goals other than to participate in the larger discussion.
Given that you have been told what's up, your inquiry seems rather strange. That is to say, it's one thing to disagree, but you never bothered to explain what you disagree with. Not even here, in your complaint thread. Treating people's efforts to communicate with you as if they don't exist in order to pout really is disrespectful. So perhaps you don't like your threads being shut down, but you have, in fact, been told why: • Bells: Counterpoint and citation of rules↗ • Bells: Summary of problem↗ • Tiassa: Historical reflection↗ • James R: Inquiry and policy note↗ If there is something about those notes you disagree with, by all means use your complaint thread to make the point. But don't pretend the staff hasn't explained it to you. You know, sometimes I joke about the curses of my life. To wit, what I wrote↗ all of what, nine days ago↗, remains true. And it really is puzzling as to why you've decided to make this leap into the abyss. And it is true that I never really have thought of you in that gutter by which we can only wish well as one stumbles through the muck, but here you are, and more fool me. Yeah, something about a joke having to do with the curses of my life. But people have told you what the problem is. If you would expect reasonable consideration of your complaint, it would probably be best if you didn't pretend those posts don't exist. Then again, if the whole point of this complaint thread is to simply find some satisfaction in furthering your general disrespect of others, try letting us know explicitly. Once upon a time, you were at least somewhat respected as a ferocious but reasonably aware and genuine conservative voice at Sciforums. This descent into self-denigrating slapstick really does have us puzzled.