All Photons Move at 300,000km/s.... But Don't?

Discussion in 'Pseudoscience' started by TruthSeeker, Jun 12, 2015.

  1. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,525
    Unless Paddoboys' smiley has a differing meaning, the point raised by JCC is valid.

    Theoretically almost everything gets the impact of Solar radiation Pressure.

    Jcc you can visit the following link to start with.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_sail
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,521
    If you say a photon has momentum, presumably you think photons do move, then. Correct?

    Yet you seem to think the photo-electric effect can be accounted for without invoking the motion of photons. How do you see that working?

    I realise I've already asked you this but you do not seem inclined to respond, in spite of having found time to exchange numerous hostile messages with PB.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    NNow I'm sure I'm not the only one here who would like the following answered.
    The fact remains, you are no Chandra or Eddington or even a cosmologist, correct?
    And yet you expect we should all ignore what we read from reputable links, what reputable Professors tell us, and what the majority of the forum accepts, in favour of your cosmologically enlightened view. Is that correct?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Give us a yes or a no, and than elaborate if you like.
    Don't be shy. It's a genuine concern of a few here I suggest.

     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Rajesh, please answer exchemist and paddo's questions.

    (Psst, paddo, it's exchemist not EXOchemist btw.)
     
  8. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,525
    Since you are not aware of exchange between me and paddoboy...The question which Paddoboy should answer, why he specifically chose to link motion of photon with PEE ?
     
  9. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    jcc's point was not valid.....it was pure pseudoscience crap.
    jcc was inferring the ISS Solar panels and asked why it doesn't move the ISS

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Solar sails are a different kettle of fish which he was disputing and which you would have been aware of if not for your stupid "paddoboy "agenda.
    But still another switcharoo try by yourself to get a point. FAIL Have another go?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  10. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,525
    Dishonesty !!
     
  11. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Pot I'd like to introduce Kettle.
     
  12. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    On your part certainly.
    I can go back and repost all relevant threads if you like Rajesh?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Just par for the course and obvious in every thread he has started.
     
  14. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,525
    For a change why don't you ask few questions to your friend Paddoboy, which he claims, they are more regarding science.

    [all these 3 points are claimed by him in this thread only]

    1. How GR fails at Planck's level ?
    2. What is the relationship between motion of Photon and PEE ?
    3. Why doesn't he believe that solar panels on the space station are not pushed by solar radiation ?

    Then if you still wish that I must answer, I will.
     
  15. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Just fucking answer, but since you insist (even though I don't need paddo to clarify).

    Paddo, please answer Rajesh's questions (even though they've been answered before).
     
  16. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543

    I could now say quite a lot, as this sort of accusations have been going on since I helped invalidate his weird take on cosmology and BNS, but I think I can go to bed now.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,525
    I had ignored you from day 1, you were warned by the Mods also. Your contribution in all the posts which you have made is to make loose comments about others, nothing else. No science, no question, no ideas. Why ? Does it take you anywhere ? Does it give you a school bully type pleasure in making such rude statements, that too when you are not at all referred ? One posting by me, referring you indirectly as 'kid' has boiled you so much, see the unwarranted impact of your non stop insults meted out to others....Hope you got the lesson.
     
  18. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    27,543
    Only an arrogant pompous fool would not be able to see who needs a lesson.
     
  19. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Hmm, I have no infractions as far as I'm aware, true I've had one (1) warning that my language was a bit too over the top, but that was when I replied to a, later perma-banned, nutjob.
    You're not one that should be talking about rude statements btw.
    I might take a bit of pleasure in telling people they're wrong or what they wrote made no sense, that doesn't make me a bully, though.
    And I certainly won't take lessons from you, crank.
     
  20. RajeshTrivedi Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,525
    ...

    No arguments !!
     
  21. Kristoffer Giant Hyrax Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,364
    Go back to ignoring me, Rajesh, just like the scientific community ignores you.

    I don't wanna be your replacement paddo.
     
  22. OnlyMe Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,914
    Another three pages of personal conflict and derogatory comment, with no meat! At least nothing worth digging out of the muck. (Meat = science, in this case.)
     
  23. exchemist Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,521
    No, for the 3rd time, I am asking YOU to explain to me what is wrong with linking the motion of photons with the photoelectric effect.

    It is YOU that is calling someone a "dunce" for doing this. And, speaking as a chemist with some knowledge of quantum theory, I do not understand why, because it seems to me to be quite a reasonable thing to do.

    I am trying to be open-minded about you, since I do not know you well, but frankly the repeated avoidance of replying directly to me, on a question of science that I am asking you, is starting to give me doubts about your integrity.
     
    Daecon likes this.

Share This Page