Rate Sciforums Moderation.!!!

...unless they are troll-mods framing others as 'trolls' and 'cranks'. Surely you must be the epitome of 'objective observer' to have come up with the rationalization that blames the victim instead of the perpetrator troll-mods. Because of that apologism effort for troll-mod abuses and blaming their victims, you are now officially worse than useless, krash troll.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

classic, with a touch of typical

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

(classic-5. extremely and usually comically apropos: apropos to an extreme degree, usually with a comical or ironic twist)
(apropos- just right: appropriate in a specific situation)
(appropriate-fitting: suitable for the occasion or circumstances)
(typical-3. as bad or annoying as usual: in accordance with your worst expectations)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Where have you been over the last ten years, Bells? So much for your 'objectivity and observational powers'. If you are one of 'them', then your denials/rationalizations are sort of lame and self-serving, aren't they? That you cannot see that even now, it shows what corrosive effects on the character and self-awareness which the usual troll-mod gang-member dynamics has over time if not nipped in the bud by regular 'cleanouts' of mods' who have become 'fixtures' and hence been most corrupted by 'power and position' for too long. James R should remove all mods and start afresh, as I suggested in my PS to Kittamaru earlier. That is the only cure for the disease infecting this site for far too long now. Good luck, Bells, in your 'common member' future. I hope you regain some of your long-lost objectivity and fairness capacity so that you may once again become a mod (if you are stripped by James R of mod status here as suggested that is. Else, good luck to the site, for it will need plenty in that case!). Bye.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

And that above, folks, is the usual useless 'calibre' of Krash's 'contribution' to sciforums and other sites. Grand, isn't it?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

The sooner James R removes all mods and gets new and fairer ones, the sooner this site will regain some credibility by eliminating such Krash/paddoboy useless troll posts which clutter the threads. Good luck, James R, everyone!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

unlike most ignoramuses(who think they are some kind of intellects or something(shrugs)) around here who do nothing but create or instigate, which ever word you want to use, arguments then scream troll,(get it?)

also, please show a post from paddoboy that is " useless troll posts which clutter the threads "
i had no clue supplying correct/accurate information/data, was clutter.
please explain and show this to me,
i'm begging you to , please.

 

The troll-mods are totally 'innocent', you say? Pull the other one, matey! Oh, I forgot; your troll posts don't amount to a hill of beans, so your opinions are eminently ignorable by any genuine member. And I suspect James R is equally unmoved by your trolling and framing the victim as the one to blame. Good luck, James R, if you still allow such as these to infest your site. Bye for now.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

also, please show a post from paddoboy that is " useless troll posts which clutter the threads "
i had no clue supplying correct/accurate information/data, was clutter.
please explain and show this to me,
i'm begging you to , please.

 

unlike most ignoramuses(who think they are some kind of intellects or something(shrugs)) around here who do nothing but create or instigate, which ever word you want to use, arguments then scream troll,(get it?)

 

Hello Kittamaru....

Hey, Kittamaru. If anyone who was labelled a 'crank' by the troll-mods posted such repetitive non-arguments as krash has above, they would have got a ban for it. See how subtle and one-eyed the biases have become in the moderating? Good luck.

 

(on a side note)(the ones who scream troll,
usually are the actual trolls.)

please do not conveniently side step my request,
since you did,i'll post it again(repetitive non-arguments).
so again,
also, please show a post from paddoboy that is " useless troll posts which clutter the threads "
i had no clue supplying correct/accurate information/data, was clutter.
please explain and show this to me,
i'm begging you to , please.

 

*Sigh*, if you insist. Here, take your pick from his posts in this thread...

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?141840-SR-Issue&p=3201196#post3201196


The conversation between chinglu and rpenner was interesting and informative on many levels. But paddoboy has to incessantly put his bigmouth oar in and clutter the interesting exchange with his usual opinionating but clueless crap. Go on, Krash, go through that thread and identify/list how many of paddo's posts in that thread added any real info/understanding to what was already being provided by those actually discussing the OP matters/maths. Go on.

See? More of paddo's incessant clueless SPAMMING of a thread by obvious/inane and clueless/personal useless linking/regurgitating/opinionating etc which any idiotic troll can do. And he has become expert at it!

Admittedly, you, Krash, are not as prolific in your idiotic spamming as paddo. That's one thing in your favour at east!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Do better, Krash, and leave the clueless idiocy posts to the paddo! He is an embarrassment to himself, his family and everyone here who is not just a troll or troll-mod themselves who depend on his sycophantic and cheerleading posts to keep up their own troll-ego. Bye, troll.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

PS: The fact that Trippy or some other mod has not banned paddoboy for at least a month (like anyone else labelled 'crank' would have been by now!) for that thread cluttering alone, shows just how one-eyed the 'tolerance' of moderation is, contrary to all protestations to the contrary by certain mods who still pretend to be even-handed in their attentions/actions. Surprise, surprise, hey?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

unbelievably hilarious,
did you seriously use a relativity denier as an example.
i actually smiled at that when i clicked on it.

anyways,
did you actually read from the beginning ?
i see others who did the same of what you are claiming,
and yet, why are you not just as upset with them ?
just your personal grudge, nothing more.

please provide an example.

with your persona and the use of " troll" i swear you're RC.

(on a side note)(the ones who scream troll,
usually are the actual trolls.)

 

I AM RC. It's no secret, even to the admin/mods who let me post here when my RC name got unfairly banned by proven mod-troll collusion and tactics which abused mod position/power. Where have you been? Or are you just a chat-bot who hasn't had its program updated?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Anyhow, you asked for examples of paddo's useless and cluttering posts. I gave you a thread-full to look at. The other participants (who were on-topic and discussing the IP matters/maths) have nothing to do with that. The point is you asked and I provide evidence of paddo's useless and cluttering posts. Instead of admitting I was correct about paddo's useless/cluttering posts, you come back with irrelevant excuses about the 'persons' involved in he interesting exchange between chinglu and rpenner? How much dishonesty and self-serving 'scientific training' did it take for you to ignore the evidence provided there and resorting to specious rationalizations for ignoring same? You are a troll, no mistake, if you still ignore the evidence you asked for! Bye, troll.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

PS: See, Kittamaru? I provided the evidence Krash asked for, and he ignores it and tries to make irrelevant excuses for doing so. D0esn't that deserve a ban of at least a month, since you and other mode have insisted you are evenhanded when it comes to banning people who transgress against the rules like that so obviously trolling and not genuine? Troll-mods here have trumped up bans for me based on much less 'excuses' than that, hey? Good luck, Kitt.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Ok, sure. Are you aware of it now? And how many other threads are you a participant in where paddo has done the same spamming/cluttering crap? Don't make excuses. Just do it and prove you are as evenhanded and objective as you pretend.

Besides, as I have proof of in the past, when I 'report' someone, if they are 'protected' by troll-mods, then it is the 'reporter' rather than the 'reported' who is framed for banning on trumped up charges. Hence why genuine members may not 'report' but depend on mods to do their duty and keep an eye on the problem, especially if they have been raised BEFORE by me and others. But no real action had been forthcoming before, and so 'reporting' is more dangerous for the 'reporter' if the 'sycophantic troll protecting' troll-mods are in control. Good luck, Trippy. Try to have less excuses and more evenhandedness. That advice goes for all remaining mod-trolls here, not just you. Bye for now.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

PS: Trippy, are you aware of what Krash has done just above? He asked for evidence of paddo's useless cluttering/trolling posts, and I provided a whole thread-full of evidence for him. But Krash came back with irrelevant self-serving excuses for ignoring the objective evidence provided. Does he get banned for a month for breaking every rule of objective discourse based on the evidence provided which he demanded? Or not? You would ban me if I did that, wouldn't you, and smile while you did so?

So, now that you are made aware of both paddo's and krash's behaviour, let's see how you behave/act as a mod once you are made aware. Good luck.

 

ahh yes.
it all makes sense.
unbelievable
(shakes head)

 

Why are you trolling the person, Krash? It's against the rules now, you know! Trippy will ban you for two months if you don't watch out!....unless Trippy is conveniently 'unaware' of your trolling the person like that, of course. Let's see just how fair a mod Trippy can be when he has been made aware of your trolling etc.

This ought to be good to watch, either it will be a travesty, a comedy or a real mod action which is not biased! Let's see, shall we. Good luck in your mod decisions/actions, Trippy. Bye for now.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

enough said

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Fair 'heads up' for you, Krash. I have reported you for trolling the person in order to distract from and ignore the evidence which you asked for about paddoboy and which I amply provided for you. Good luck, now that the mods (Trippy?) have been made aware of your trolling and rule breaking etc here.