x ray camera

Discussion in 'Computer Science & Culture' started by chattunnel, May 18, 2014.

  1. chattunnel Registered Member

    Messages:
    4
    HI, I was taking progress photos of my body and when I looked closer, I realized the camera was actually seeing through my body. Okay I did find it weird that my camera was able to take pictures that seen through a human and tried to find another probable cause for example maybe reflections but nothing persists. If you look specifically at the door knob in my right arm which is my probable cause in conclusion that my camera can see through humans. The door knob was being blocked by my body but it still showed itself in the photo. You can even see the cracks and border of the wall that was suppose to be blocked by my body. Has anyone ever came across this? Is there something wrong with my genetics? Why is this photo seeing through my body? My photo can be seen here: View attachment 7112
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    It's a double exposure.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    It isn't x-rays: you moved while that camera was taking the photo.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. chattunnel Registered Member

    Messages:
    4
    okay I see a valid point of possibility by your statement. Please look at the crack above the door you can clearly see it through my head until the end. If I were to have moved the more I did the blurrier I would become and the more background would be exposed. I look pretty stable and clear and the photo caught the whole top crack of the door from beginning to end, even on my left arm you can see the steel of the ac cover behind my left arm. I would really accept a valid explanation for this event I just can't see me moving being the cause with all the factors to take into perspective regarding your explanation. It's two things I believe the camera or my genetic build up. Can someone get more in detail for me?
     
  8. chattunnel Registered Member

    Messages:
    4
    Also, how is double exposure possible without a photo edit? I did not alter this photo in anyway other then a photo crop and you can have a forensics analysts dissect my photo to back my statement.
     
  9. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    There are cameras which allow the shutter to be snapped twice without advancing the film. And it's a trivial matter to create a double exposure with a digital camera.
     
  10. chattunnel Registered Member

    Messages:
    4
    I can see your point and it's valid explanation. The photo was taken such a long time ago that I can't remember any details clearly. I mean, I was walking to the position where I posed with the camera on self timer and I could of also been using the multi shot option but then again maybe I wasn't. I just wanna make sure if this is a science break through or a superhero gene that we knew. Is there a way of proving your answer alex?
     
  11. AlexG Like nailing Jello to a tree Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,304
    A photo expert could probably tell by examining the original. Other than that, your camera has the capability, and was set on automatic. If it was an x-ray photo, you wouldn't see what's behind you without also seeing your skeleton.
     
  12. Russ_Watters Not a Trump supporter... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,051
    That's not exactly how I would put it: the flash and "shutter" are not aligned, which gives a similar effect.
     

Share This Page