Splinter: Dispute From "Timeless vs Time"

It should have been left IN SITU where it transpired/started, so the full context was available for due diligence by other observers/actors.

Glad to see my exposure/complaints have made you rethink your previous arrogantly 'dismissive' and prejudicial approach to the VICTIM's side of the story. Thanks for doing the right thing at last, Trippy, Tiassa. kudos for that at least!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I have experimented by engaging the CONVENIENT TROLLS you have been proven to favor as a means to frame and sbotage and finally 'excuse' your prejudicial bans against the victims and letting the trolls to get away scott free or just a slap on the wirst for show. It's been obvious, Trippy, to all except insensible trolls and their exploiting mods.

Remember when you even admitted (in one of dmoe's thread IIRC) that you 'engage your targets in conversation and string them along so you could eventually have an excuse to ban them?


And the SLANDERS and LIES and PERSONAL FRAMES by the trolls you 'run with' and 'exploit for entrapment' is OK with you? LOL

And what I have observed about your (and certain others) actions/abuses as mod-troll gang is proven fact by experiment, not slander. In fact, out of your own two-faced mouthing you condemn yourself not long ago...

You effectively and unambiguously ADMITTED therein to employing ENTRAPMENT TACTICS from your MOD position for the intention of targeting and banning. You even intervened in that thread without any due cause and intimidated the posters concerned by that very intervention! And when I called you out on it, you 'flagged me' and intimidated me! Even when I PM'd you as recommended by admin, in order to reasonable discuss and have you reconsider the facts, you just DENIED any wrongdoing on your part and just 'blew me off' arrogantly in the confidence of you having the power and 'mod mates' in your prejudicial version 'pockets, so that no matter where I went from there, I, the one who called YOU out for abusing the mod power/system like that, was behind the eight-ball and couldn't get anyone to TAKE YOU TO TASK because no-one in your 'mod pockets' was prepared to DOUBT YOUR WORD and actually look into the matter properly and discuss the matter/evidence with ME. So please don't pretend anymore that the system was fair to the complainant, and wasn't being abused by the mods who are supposed to keep up the spirit and standards of fair play. Won't wash anymore, Trippy. Self-delusion if you continue thinking no-one has been watching and recording every abuse you and your mod-protected 'convenient troll' gang has been up to contrary to the rules and spirit of open science discourse on the matters' merits, and not the person's reputation 'sabotaged/framed' by the mods/trolls for intimidating/banning.

The problem is not that there is lax moderation in the Physics/Maths section lately; it's that when YOU DO INTERVENE, it's obviously out of PERSONAL BIAS and PREJUDICIAL 'version' of 'excuses' for doing so, which have no regard for all the facts in the context. You immediately CHOOSE to sanction the VICTIM who has engaged the TROLLS who have been let loose to sabotage and bury discussions in their troll crap, while you and your troll mates accuse others of doing it? Has it not occurred to your simple mind that IF the trolls disn't bait and repeat silly challenges and other 'tactics; of evasion, which then FORCE in self defense the victim to repeat his comments and so be brnded as 'spamming' thereby, then there would not need to be such repetitious exchanges on EOTHER 'side' of the discussion. First get rid of the trolls baiting and creating/repeating the 'framing' challenges and personal accusations etc etc, then one can more readily see and act against any other poster who is still repeating without cause. Too simple for your simple mind? No. It's because YOU and your TROLL mates have a baiting/targeting agena to cause such situations so you can find some 'excuse' for banning/sanctioning/intimidating etc the VICTIMS....while the trolls you explot in your ADMITTED ENTRAPMENT TACTICS are rewarded by further freedom to sabotage and personally prejudice discussions!

Stop pretending to yourself and others, Trippy. You have been caught out and called out before this latest instance. Being 'lenient' and/or 'appeasing' types of crooked mods like you and your other troll-mod gang of old 'associates behind the scenes' is a fools play. Only direct EXPOSURE to the light and excision from power positions will do. Anything less merely prolongs the infestation and loss of integrity 'downhill slide' for any site which still has within its 'trusted sphere' such obviously UNSUITABLE CHARACTERS for such trusted position/power.

Can you imagine how your VICTIMS feel day after day of your
selective' intimidation and threats and 'censor in advance' thereby? Your interventions have bee proven PARTIAL (obviously intentionally as proven already more than once, because you always ignore the trolls who caused the situation, and they get away with a 'slap on the wrist' just for show in case anyone is watching you at your worst modding silliness), UNINFORMED (you admit you don't always read back fully to ascertain who is the culprit who should be banned and just ban the victim instead) and just plain PREJUDICED from 'old PERSONAL/EGO baggage' and new personal agendas).

Your selective 'interventions' intimidate and censor proactively, but you don't see anything 'wrong' in your selective intervention as 'mod' when it suits YOU and your 'stalking horse troll gang' agendas and prejudices and tactics. How lame to keep pretending you are in any way still fit to hold the respected and honorable role of MODERATOR at this or any other fair science discourse site!

My advice, Trippy: Give up the troll-mod-gang powerplay route, and just concentrate on getting back some of that personal/professional integrity and respect you have been losing for so long as part of that 'relic' FORUM MAFIA gang started so long ago by the crazy "dave" the Doughnut whose 'insanity and insults and plain madness of mind and character is still plainly posting at physforum with the permission/fear of the sole mod there (you know who) who has lost all credibility as impartial observer/commentator long ago (again, he was proven and witnessed to EGREGIOUS abuses of his power to frame, hack and otherwise delete/distort the objective posting record to 'cover his ass' when he was challenged and exposed. How can any self-respecting 'moderator' allow the sort of personal crap and insane disruption to discourse at physforum in this day and age, and still pretend to himself he is in any way personally/professionally 'trustworthy'? Insensible types are like that, no matter how well 'educated' they think they are. Obviously, such 'education' missed instilling a sense of integrity and fair play in that one...and in the FORUM MAFIA troll-mod 'gang' he once openly and cynically exploited/fostered over there. The further that type of character is kept away from ANY POSITION of POWER, the better for science and society everywhere/when in future. Good luck to you, Trippy, whatever comes after this 'mod' stint. Anything is better for your character than this 'enablement' of the less-than-better-side of your character. Nothing personal,; it's the principle of the thing, and the greater good for science and society that I have spoken up and exposed such things as these across the internet sites. Wish you well for your future, Trip.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Given his posts above, why would you do that?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Undefined, my issuing that infraction and ban had nothing to do with previous actions or the advice or prejudice of another moderator or anything of the sort... the reason for it was written plain as day. It had naught to do with the past or any perceived injustice... it was purely because you were lashing out against anyone and everyone around you. Like I said before - even when you have a point, if you make that point like a madman, nobody is going to take you seriously.

Principle is great. Fighting injustice and wrongdoing is a noble cause. Just remember; the road to hell is paved with good intentions.

The irony is... it was Trippy that advocated for the ban to be reversed and you given the chance to make your statement here.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Please stop 'characterizing and framing' to suit your rationalizations fro your uninformed precipitate actions which prejudiced thereby even more the victim's situaton needing more explanation to defend against your added unwise premature action which deprived the victim of his rseponse to your latest erroneus mod action in haste.

And why don't you READ ALL the pertinent the posts before making such silly melodramatic 'characterizations' as 'willy-nilly attacks? I was advisedly and purposely engagingf the trolls involved to PROVE THE POINT that they WERE trolls. How plain does it have to be before you mods even GET SOMETHING STRAIGHT for a change before you PREJUDICIALLY act out of UNINFORMED arrogance as if you know best when you DON'T know what's what at all in fact.

Look, Kitt, OI appreciate that at least you TRY to be fair. But in this case it wasn't fair what you did. OK? Obviously you were acting on 'kneejerk' frokm your own 'version' and 'characterization' excuse/justification....only it wasn't proper to do that when you were not in possession of all the facts.

Please understand this clearly: The trolls I engaged were not being 'attacked willy-nilly' like you seem to have got the impression; they were being EXPOSED by my challenging their own transgressions against site rules and sabotaging/trolling threads/dicussions withn repeated DENIALS from 'beliefs' and so-called counterarguments based on PURELY PHILOSOPHICAL stances (which Grumpy's own linked article proved was the case!).

The trolls, who often accuse others of not facing the real facts, just kept DENYING and repeating the ame LOST CAUSE 'counterargument' which their OWN mainstream links proved was false and not actually a physical counterargument but 'beliefs and philosophy pure and simple. They were showing double standards and 'trolling to death' the threads because they were LOSING THAT ARGUMENT. Not proper debate of science, is it? So why should the 'approved trolls' get away with what 'targeted for banning' posters can't get away with? Not a good look when someone tries to rationalize away the fact that the trolls are getting their way and the victims being intimidated/sabotaged and framed for more bans in that obvious and crooked way.

So, Kitt, please STOP characterizing people/activity in your own 'melodramatic' way that prejudices future observers. OK?

It was internet experiments engaging the trolls and mod in question who were causing/encouraging the double-standards and troll tactics which mitigated against proper open science discourse of the science not the persons. OK?

Naturally, no hard feelings at my end, Kitt, especially since I am convinced you are still at least trying to do the right thing, despite the already no doubt effects/influences from the bad mods 'example' set over the years they have been allowed to get away with and has to some extent become part of the (bad pars) of the internet mod 'culture' of certain disreputable (proven) 'groups'. Thanks, Kitt.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

So doing the right thing at last, in order to let the victim put his side of the story is NOT to your 'liking', AlexG? Wow. What 'fair' mind you got, Mr Troll-gangmember of the old "FORUM MAFIA". Mate, if you can't even pretend to be 'fair minded', then don't post and allow your subconscious to betray your obvious trollish bent like that and prove me right, again, out of your own mouth. Look to your own self and motivs, AlexG.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Where is James R then?

This is ridiculous.

 

The rants you posted against the moderators are exactly the same as the rants you posted at other sites. Being the victim is your thing.

 

So when the mods and trolls lie and frame a targeted-for-banning victim, that is OK? But when the victim points out how and where it happens, that's NOT OK?...and you prefer to characterize it as 'rants' when the facts are made known to the forum at large?

Seems like you have a 'liking' for abuse of power by those in position of power. And anyone daring to take them to task using the facts is automatically 'ranting' and so should be dismissed BY those same abusers in power?

That's exactly the tactic the CHURCH was using for decades to 'characterize' the victims of abuse as 'hysterical' and 'ranting' etc etc, by the very same ABUSERS responsible who have later been EXPOSED as abusers. Where is all the 'hysterical' and 'ranting' now? The facts are the facts, silly Alex, Beer. Calling/characterizing them like you do is just a tactic to DENY YOUR ABUSES and/or BLAME THE VICTIM. You should be ashamed of yourselves, acting like pedophile priests/church gangs of abusers who deny they have done anything wrong and call the victims names and pretend they are the 'problem'.

Nasty, minds like yours have a lot to answer for, even as enablers and protectors and excusers of such abuse of power while you blame the victim.

That's an 'interesting' world view you seem to have 'acquired' from somewhere, mate. By any chance was it during your old gangmember days in the physforum "FORUM MAFIA" and its 'code'? LOL

Give it up, Alex, Beer. You are looking more silly with every post 'in defense of UNreasoning mod-troll gang activity' now EXPOSED, again....and you really don't 'like' it, do you. Tough, trolls.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Grumpy,

Did any of the cranks ever answer you?

 

Undefined, the only "target" on you is the one you paint on yourself by being such an outspoken advocate against... well, to be fair, we aren't really sure WHAT you are against when it comes to authority... perhaps total anarchy is your thing? We aren't even sure anymore.

The simple fact is this: If you were "marked" for banning... it would have been done long ago... as it stands, we (the moderation staff) don't have to provide much of a reason to justify a permanent ban, especially not when a member has so many infractions issued for the exact same pattern of misbehavior. Hell, if I were so inclined, i could probably permanently ban you now and few would bat an eye, and I doubt anyone would request a serious inquiry as to why. Part of this is because the Supermods are somewhat overwhelmed with babysitting the otherwise untended forums (where moderators have either gone AWOL or left entirely) and the Admins, in my observation, prefer to leave things to run without their intervention when and if possible.

If you believe ANYTHING I say, believe this - you are not "marked for banning" or anything of the sort. Yes, you are a very apparent member; you are strong in your convictions and you will pursue them to the ends of the earth. I can respect that; I'm the same way. However, you have to learn when and how to pick and choose your battles.

If you honestly feel discriminated against, submit a ticket at the support site and it WILL be reviewed. Provide evidence, preferably quotes/posts/et al to back what you are saying; don't expect us to dive through your entire posting history and read every thread you have ever been a part of to substantiate your claim.

I know this sounds harsh... but it is the honest truth. I'm not trying to "rationalize" anything (nor was I with my previous post, much as you may disagree).

 

I took undefined off ignore to watch his meltdown. Now he goes back on.

 

Take it to the relevant thread. Discussion there will determine what's what, not your trolling here. And how can BlackHoley answer when he is suspended? Why make it your trolling points to frame it as if evading? Why not wait until he returns and discussion resumes according to facts presented on both sides, as it should be, instead of your continuing 'personalizing' trolls like this one. And Grumpy was already presented with mainstream matter from Einstein, Penrose, even Sean Carroll (in Grumpy's own link!) where 'time' is clearly a derived/abstract concept/analytical tool and part of a UNreal analytical maths/geometry construct called 'space-time'. That has already been provided in the relevant threads, but Grumpy et all deny the facts therein from Einstein et al, and still maintain that their own 'personal beliefs' and 'philosophical conceptual' sense of 'time' is more than it is in fact 'physically'...a derived/abstraction tool for comparative analysis construct, as Einstein and other mainstreamers have made clear. Grumpy et al denying that now puts the onus on them to make their case AGANST the mainstream case/facts presented for their reference and understanding in real physical energy-space (not Unreal 'space-time' abstract maths) terms, and certainly not in their repeated belief/philosophy terms.

Leave all that to the threads concerned and the discussions will say one way or the other when concluded fairly. Thanks, A Id. .

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Can't face that you have been shown as less than a wholesome character, by apologizing for abusers and blaming the victims like you have been doing and is made clear again above? Is the 'ignore' button your 'defense mechanism' to protect your own psychological construct when things get a bit too close to home and the nastiness you've been engaging in is brought too close that you might not be able to ignore it unless you place people on 'ignore'? That's no way to face the truth about yourself, mate. What sort of objective scientist wannabe does that in order that they may deny the objective facts and continue in their own nastiness/frauds? No wonder the mainstream professions are riddled with fraudsters and scoundrels, if this is the 'calibre' of 'scientist material' that has been accepted' as the norm' in the ranks. Sad.

 

The victims are the people interested in physics.

Because the cranks trash the forum.

 

You obviously missed the pertinent fact that it WAS DONE LONG AGO. I was RealityCheck, and it was PROVEN I was banned unjustly due to the very same mod-troll collusion for targeting and banning, by sabotage, personalizing and general trolling-to-order so the colluding MOD could have an excuse for banning 'history' frame-up leading to permaban 'justification' by that same 'crooked mod' version/history framed towards that end.

And you using that lame and long since discredited 'angle' that the 'victim paints a target on himself' is a WRONGHEADED evasion of the targeting that went on REGARDLESS of what the target did or did not do. He was damn if he did and damned if he didn't, because he was the TARGET of that PROVEN gang. That prior proven banning instance is past now; and I would not like to bring up the names involved again, because they are no longer active here. But I will give you their names if I am forced to, just to prove to you that your AGAIN characterizing the vicim as 'somehow responsible' for the MOD-TROLL ABUSES against him is NO LONGER TENABLE given the history of these problems.

If you are not yet aware of the troll-mod tactics (used to be more subtle), then you will have missed that the targeted victim is already on the ban list (hit list) of the mod-troll gangs involved. It doesn't matter what that target does or not, the mod-trolls tactics will sabotage, bait, personalize, involve lies and repeated insinuations etc etc, until the thread is ruined and the OP has to waste time and effort in futile distractions fighting against the mod-troll targeted MO which no matter which way things go, until now, the victim could appeal etc but has to date been proven that the system was stacked against the victim...as the old Church Pedophile network and apologists/systems were stacked against the abuse victims.

Anyhow, before you again use 'generalized' apologist 'rationalizations, make sure you are discerning and not just lumping ME or other genuine NON-TROLL members with some 'amorphous entity/group' in your mind that are 'all trolls automatically because thy are disagreeing with orthodoxy'. OK? There are cranks and trolls and their are dissenting thinkers and rebels who will argue properly if ALLOWED to do so by the system. It's important to science and society that you make such distinctions and not just automatically "tar all dissenters" with the same 'crank brush'. Just because you have experienced a real hopeless 'crank', it does not follow that all cranks are 'hopeless'. Use your judgement fairly based on the discussion points made/defended, and NOT on personalizing the source. Thanks. Good luck, Kitt...I think the fact that you are at least conversing with the victim in this instance shows you are a 'good guy' (male/female) and thus better mod-material than some obvious types I have mentioned! Cheers!

 

OCD much!

 

*sighs* Undefined, I'm simply going to drop it here and now, because no matter what is said, you have already made up your mind and taken your stance, and nothing is going to change that.

Just allow me to say... you are trying to compare someone being "treated unfairly" on an internet forum to children being molested in the catholic church...

 

Those 'people' you so eagerly 'approve' have proven you wrong. They trolled when they were losing a debate. They used an 'accomodating mod' to intimidate and censor proactively with threats, and when that fails they frame the victim for banning. All proven in open forum by experiment. So you have no more 'dodges' and 'rationalizations' at your disposal to deny the nasty facts that proves they are egotistical and trollish saboteurs of open and fair science discourse.

They are worse than any 'crank', since they pretend to be defending mainstream even when they are bringing mainstream into disrepute by their 'example' here and elsewhere which have been proven against them and their distasteful tactics.

Shame on anyone still pretending they have been anything but egomaniacal ganglike destructive influence on the sites.

 

well, so much for trippy being a ho.
we all have our bad days i guess.

 

Was it rpenner that banned you from physforum?

I think he's banned five doughnut exponentially more than you.