1 is 0.99(9) Administrative Thread.

More word salad from the master chef of word salads. Look, this is basic calculus, you either know it or you don't, your pretending that you know doesn't pass the mustard. Let the ones that have made the effort to learn these subjects discuss, you definitely never learned math and it shows.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Why are you copying and pasting your word salads from one thread to another?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No, it is not, it is an example of your ignorance in terms of basic math.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Brave words; from someone who obviously doesn't bother to read the other person's pertinent posts and full context to avoid cross-purpose exchanges like these.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Keep calm. I already explained where I was coming from and my perspective on the essential matters. I don't want to digress further into irrelevant 'notation' format issues that are NOT the fundamental actions in all the string/number operations/behaviors. Thanks. Good luck with your other discussions with MD, Dinosaur or whomever!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Yes, of course! Sure! If you say so!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Have you finished with your trolling/insulting/baiting and empty posts now?

 

Hi undefined

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

,

Your stance on the number zero seems to show that you have no math education and are a complete fool. Each post on the subject that you write seems to show a deeper level of ignorance than your previous post. I keep thinking that it could not get any more absurd but you keep surprising me, mate.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Hope you don't take this wrong!! No hard feelings just pointing out how much of a complete moron you look like by continuing to discuss zero. Keep having fun and don't worring that you are showing everyone how little you know.

No hard feelings this end.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Cheers.

 

You're lucky I have an Aussie type sense of humor, mate! I see the intent of jocular parody. Good one! (sincere

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

)

On a serious note, origin, for someone like yourself, who often and clearly admitted to NOT reading others' posts fairly (if at all), you should be the last person whose opinion (on anything posted by me and others' on the question/nature of the '0' as infinitesimal, non-nothing etc) anyone with a serious approach to advance of status quo would accept....except AS a joke opinion.

Fair nuff, mate? The joke will be on you if you don't watch out, mate! (sincerely,

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

) ...and, of course, sincerely, no hard feelings at this end, fellow sciforums member!.

PS: Good luck in your 'static world' where maths and physics seem to be a 'frozen status quo' in your mind already. Maybe you should remind yourself that neither are yet complete and consistent in every way. Hence you might read/think more closely on what new perspectives/suggestions are actually being discussed/offered before you kneejerk and joke from a self-satisfied and preconclusionary state of mind/knowledge base (which latter is changing even as we speak; and will leave you behind if you don't take discussion in science and maths more seriously, and more diligently look out for what novel gems can be found amongst the internet dross). (sincere

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

)

 

Nah, I was just serving one of your standard word salads. Funny thing, you don't even realize I was mocking you. Mate. (sincere

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

).

 

Can't you read, Tach? I specifically stated that I saw your post as jocular allusions. Don't you know what "jocular" means?

How desperate are you, to evade the maths/physics issues/points being made/discussed, that you will keep making such empty/insulting posts based on your own strawmen?

You have been reported.

 

It wasn't an allusion, I was just mocking your pretentious word salads. Mate. Sincere .

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Riiiiight.

 

I acknowledged your joke (parody; just like the one I acknowledged from origin).

Your allusions were to Hamiltonian etc. as part of your joke/parody. Hence "jocular allusions".

Tach, if that is your best 'scientific' discussion/rebuttal comprehension/participation level, then what are you even doing here except TROLLING and baiting and insulting etc? Do better with your talents (whatever they are).

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

And yes, I note your "Riiiight!" ploy. It is a baiting ploy aimed at making it difficult for me to disengage while you keep TROLLING me and I have to defend against it by coming back and calling you out on your TROLLS.

That post is also being reported. Good luck, Tach.

 

I thought that you were going into "read-only" mode, riiiight. Mate. Sincere

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Why do you troll? Is that your compulsion?

My read-only state starts when I have fully disengaged. Because of your trolls, Tach, I have not fully disengaged yet. That is your obvious motivation for your trolling and empty posts. Do better with your "MS in Applied Mathematics", Tach. Bring honor, not dishonor to the institution which gave it to you.

 

No , trolling and serving word salads with spam is your specialty . Mate. Sincerely.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

But, you see, people are getting tired of your word salads, so why don't you take a break from serving them? Though this is "Alternative Theories", enough is enough.

Well, I went to school , I studied and I graduated with an advanced degree. The same cannot be said about you.

 

Thank you for providing a comically inane position on something as mundane as the exsistence of zero.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

So, the "cheap shot" at someone who had logged out was irresistible to you, troll. Typical.

If you had really read any of it, your opinions would be a lot better taken at face value. Since you haven't bothered to read/understand fairly/properly, then your post is just another demonstration of the non-scientific attitude you bring to the forum discussions where serious/subtle matters are involved. You and Tach seem determined to devalue both the forum and yourselves by this trolling and non-reading-in-context dismissive attitude. Good luck with that.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Just what IS the matter with you?

You can't even resist injecting your VENOMOUS animus into an innocent exchange between me and arfa, even when I was just asking for HIS clarification so that I could read him correctly?

Seriously, what IS the matter with you, Troll?

Your post has been reported.

 

Nothing, I am pointing out your mistakes, as usual. You guessed wrong, arfa was right, this is a basic arithmetic problem, you guessed wrong.

There is no venom, just a correction, <shrug>. Sincerely

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You mean, me correcting your mistake, mate?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

What "correction" is there needed by YOU, when arfa can speak for himself on the request for clarification pure and simple?

Your compulsion seems to have gone rampant again, Troll; such that you can't even resist bringing your fatuous/"corrections" into something that is not a subject for "correction" but clarification FROM arfa brane (and not you, the patently compulsive and MALIGNANT troll here).

Again, your post has been reported, Troll.

 

The correction I made. To YOUR error, mate. Sincerely.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!