At Rest with our Hubble view

I see you're out of the closet in full regalia trolling your own thread again.

Bored isn't quite the reaction to the "layman's view" of Penrose.

Silly is closer, only with a dash of melancholy.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I mean the energy being taken in would be in a lower entropy state and thanks to your corrections and assertions have more potential energy.

I'll take champagne

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Of course. I'd ask what your so called professional take on it is, but I know you don't answer my questions put directly to you, ... and that is fine.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

To reiterate. The original question which began this argument was, "a photon is absorbed by an electron. Is the photon in a state by itself of lower entropy?"

 

What photon? It was absorbed by the electron, remember?

 

So going from light speed to zero is more chaotic?

 

No, you are trying to compare the energy of a photon to a nonexisting photon which is nonesensical.:shrug:

 

Huh? When a photon is absorbed it ceases to exist? I believe the word was entropy by the way. Your description of events is farfetched. Are you serious or is this some kind of mental test to see if I was paying attention to the words I was writing?

 

Actually he did connect the dots. You can disagree with how he draws the connection lines, but he did have an explanation.

Further, Penrose believes that information is lost when it falls to the singularity within a black hole, and is not preserved in some correlation at the event horizon or in the particles emitted as the black hole evaporates. (In this view he is now in a distinct minority of theoretical physicists.) This makes black holes into entropy destroying machines. They devour all of the degrees of freedom of the particles that fall into them and then, when they evaporate with a “pop”, it's all lost and gone away. This allows Penrose to avoid what would otherwise be a gross violation of the second law of thermodynamics. In his scheme the big bang has very low entropy because all of the entropy created in the prior æon has been destroyed by falling into black holes which subsequently evaporate.​

 

Information differs from energy in that energy is an amount. Information is the specific substance reduced by a black body. In other words it looses shape not quanta which is in observance with the holographic principal.

 

The article expresses the view that inflationary theory says that the distribution of temperature variations across the sky should be smooth, or isotropic also referred to as Gaussian, rather than having discernible structures within it. The anomalies are non-Gaussian and point to energy density perturbations in the earliest low entropy, high denstiy stage of the big bang arena. Regardless of the causes of the perturbations, the cosmic microwave background is nonrandom and non-Gaussian, pointing to preconditions to the big bang.

Remember why Inflationary Theory was laid in on top of GR? It was theorized as a fix to explain how the observation of the CMB could be caused by the Big Bang, and not by preconditions.

Agree or not, my so called model invokes preconditions and attributes the CMB to the energy density that was outside the tiny space occupied by the low entropy, high denstiy condition at the moment of the bang. The idea is that there is a greater universe that preexisted our big bang, and it is characterized by a cosmic microwave background perpetuated by a potentially infinite and eternal landscape of active big bang arenas in various stages of formation and maturity.

That eliminates the exponential inflation which is necessary to connect the CMB to the big bang event, and eliminates the singularity as well. Those are two characteristics of the standard cosmology that cannot be falsified, but neither can it be falsified that there were preconditions, and the simple preconditions of a preexisting greater universe immediately eliminates two of the most controversial aspects of BBT, without adding any controversial aspect other than the Big Bang did not represent something from nothing. And that makes three controversial aspects of BBT that go away with my scenario.

Hence I stand by my so called model, and the parent arena concept that would predictably cause the observed wide angle anomaly in the CMB, due to gravitational profiles of each parent arenas being imprinted on the space into which our arena is expanding, and thus imprinted in the CMB that is encountered and encompassed by our arena as it expands.

(24018)

 

Qw. Could we chalk it up to the universe being inside a black body and calling the universe a wash?

In other words we are the balance of radiation between two black bodies?

 

I'll have Italian, please.

 

My pleasure. Word salad at its finest.

 

No, sorry.

 

Penrose Mistates/Mispeaks

QW, his use of words here are oxymorons(?) i.e. do not cojoin in same sentence properly.

At best he could have been refering to a macro-infinite, and such concept cannot have outer boundary shape. This should not take much rational logic for a common sense person on to understand.

As I made clear in various cosmic heirarchies macro-micro infinite non-occupied space can only be shaped from within, by a finite occupied space( our Universe ) shape. These are simple concepts that few grasp, much less acknowledge if they do grasp, and no one has every conceded the rational logic of such a concept/scenario.

Micro-infinite can have no shape either. Infinity can have no shape.

Finite = shape = 1D line, 2D polygon, 3D polyhedron etc....and not infinity.

I like his ideas on black holes or some celestial phenomena that does remove entropy tho.

< O > = finite non-occupied space shaping from within macro-micro infinite non-occupied space.

Simple not complex conceptual scenario.

...time arrow >...past )( future....> time arrow..

Eternal NOW is the non-dimensional kissing point )( where past and future meetynad are conceptually seperate.

Think of NOW as a finite 2D frame/slice of our finite 3D Universe.

If I recall Brian Greene expresses this in his book "Fabric of the Cosmos".

And do not forget, jacob bekenstiens comments, that, "we appear to be 2D creatures having an illusions of 3D"....via his black hole mathematics and subsequent holographic scenarios.

For a simplistic view of singularity ideas of a black hole and their evaporation, then go to following link to see a zero-volume tetrahedron i.e. what your seeing is a 3D volume tetrahedron as it comes to zero volume but maintains its four planes.

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/plates/figs/plate31.html

A zero volume tetrahedron evolves into the cubo(6)-oct(8)hedron aka Vector Equlirbrium aka 12-around-1 spheres/sphericals with 12 external triangles as the that which has evaporated away.

The spherical cubo-octahedrons surface area is equal to the four curved, great/equlatorial, hexagonal planes that bisect and define the cubo-octahedra/vectro equilibrium.

This is a simple way of grasping how what is happeing when you read about what is inside a black hole--- ie. the four hexagonal planes ---are expressed o the black holes surface. That too may be Bekenstien/Hawking finding. I forget where that concept originally came from.

r6

 

If there was any measure of information in that statement I could weigh it and the scale would still point to zero. Go figure.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Shannon's theorem for blackbody information reduction . . . plus noise. :crazy:

This salad has got magic mushrooms in it.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Buckminster Fuller meets Stephen Hawking in that contraption that made The Human Fly.

Waiter, there's an icosahedron in my salad! :wtf:

 

Why are there so many goddamn drunks on this forum?

 

Reading too much of it could lead to drinking. I'd like to see the label: Warning: the National Academy of Sciences has determined that excessive consumption of word salad can be detrimental to your intellectual health. :cheers: