On the idea of time in physics-relativity

Looking at what Eram said again, its not that bad, but I would rather it be different.

I was thinking nothing can be assumed to be at rest, so everyone's ruler is length contracted to some extent, everyone's clocks are time dilated to the same extent, and in no situation will the light reflect off his mirrors simultaneously, they all happen to everyone and not just Homer!
Could you live with that?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Oh, that was just a copy-and-paste from ash's original post (#607, Pg 31)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It has been a classic thread. That could happen.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What could happen?

 

Actually,this was explained in ether frame.. No need to use ether frame.. at last did you see those who understand relativity,look at the videos in the point of reference??

It actually described the history of relativity from MME to SR. So you could see using ether frame. But you do understand relativity,so look in the point of reference. that you will understand what i said. Before Einstein proposed his theory everyone used absolute frame "ether frame"..

 

Misquoting I thought it was you said that.

 

@Robittybob1

I didn't made the video. The one who made was explaining the history from MME to SR. I saw that he explained MME with the help of PR. So i thought that post would be useful in this discussion.. I said because don't complain that he used ether frame.. He was describing history of it...

 

Ok. Anyway, even ash didn't write it, it came from someone else on PF.

 

Well that is all history then. Let's get on with the discussion. I try to quote properly when I use someone else's words to stop this confusion as to who said what.

 

Hope you understood the point i said.

 

And what point are you talking about now?

 

You posted this recently:

I gave this answer:
"""""Actually,this was explained in ether frame.. No need to use ether frame.. at last did you see those who understand relativity,look at the videos in the point of reference??

It actually described the history of relativity from MME to SR. So you could see using ether frame. But you do understand relativity,so look in the point of reference. that you will understand what i said. Before Einstein proposed his theory everyone used absolute frame "ether frame".."""""

 

You seem to have a very unusual way of building sentences, to the point where I just about can't understand you. What country do you come from? I'm sorry, but I'm none the wiser after reading your reply.

 

I will say what i meant. In ether frame,you can consider any object moving with respect to it to contract,time dilation. But we can explain the known natural phenomena without ether. That theory that explain is SR. Do you understand now?

I am sure i have made my points clear now..

 

Yes. I am sorry.. I didn't write the sentences properly. Even i am finding difficult to understand!! I will make sure that this does not happen in the future.