Big Bang Theory is WRONG - 33 Top Scientists Object

AlexG; I appreciated your earlier, clear, understandable and non-sarcastic reply. Just to get a bit closer to what our current concepts are, when we say it expanded from a very small size (such as the size of an apple) is it also thought that that size had a shape ?

(Neverfly - thanks. I'm not really interested in your responses to my posts - no need to trouble yourself any further).

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It depends on what type of apple you are referring to. Granny Smith, Red delicious, Golden, Road....

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Oh, no- really- I don't mind. It's no trouble at all.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Lakon- when you ask absurdities and are unclear, then refuse to allow people to explain things or provide you with answers to questions you asked, you basically tell people, "I do not care to learn." "I will reject any possible resource do to the size and shape of my ego."
Think about what you asked: "Ok, when it was the SIZE of an apple, was it also the SHAPE of an apple?" I could just picture a little green leaf poking off the top of the universe.

You're damn right I laughed when I read that. And deservedly so. I also facepalmed. Every bit of what you're asking is right at your fingertips with google. You haven't even read the most basic literature available online at nasa.gov or wikipedia, I would guess, given the complete and total lack of understanding you have. Put no effort in, demand others put that effort in for you, then get your knickers in a twist as to how they do it.

So don't cop an attitude with me because of your poor wording, son. If you want to post questions and get actual responses, you're going to need to get past your entitlement issues. You think people are obligated to explain complex theory to you without burdening your brain with Mathematics. Remember you complaining about whether you need to learn some math to understand things like Relativity? I told you off but also defended you that time. You only get that courtesy once. You want knowledge handed to you while you demand how it's delivered and that it does not impinge upon your ego or require that you put any effort into understanding the concepts. A grown up would have sheepishly corrected themselves. Not childishly hit the "off" switch.

That's going to get you exactly nowhere in science.

If you post nonsense, you are going to get called on it. Grow up and deal with it. If you want answers to questions, don't think you can dictate how others pander to your ego while they try to alleviate your ignorance problem for you.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Shape is more problematical. There is no external framework against which to establish a shape. The internal geometry of the universe is complex, and only lends itself to a mathematical description.

 

All planets where first stars. Every star was first a sun. In my opinion sun-fusion(dying star) created a new planet through rotating sun-magma. Creating of our galaxy, more than one stars in line. We are protected by our own sun. The sun destroys meteors with very high temperatures. Like a chain-reaction.

 

I wonder what victorespinoza would have to add to that...

 

No clue, i don't read.

 

What color it was?

 

I guess that too would depend on what kind of apple Lakon is talking about and at what stage of development the apple is in.

 

A colour that we cannot see, but we know that it exists, because it moves the waves.

 

Lol .. a real basket case of goodies then !

 

That's what I was really enquiring around about. Shapewise, unknown - then and now. I understood we're not sure or even aware of shape now, but didn't know how that related to the beginning. Thanks for clarifying it so well.

 

I assume you are joking.

 

The Rotating Sun-magma has nothing to with the creation of earth, sorry for the confusion. In my opinion, the origin of our galaxy is created by a couple of stars ''sticking'' together, cooling down, creating earth, moon, etc. Some people even say that we've had two suns in our galaxy. This sun must been at the edge of our galaxy, mostly called ''The black Sun''.

 

Is basic science education this piss poor?

 

I am not some kind of Guru. I just like to think about Pseudoscience.

 

No. It is not. What you're looking at could not be the fault of the school system. It just isn't possible to teach a kid that badly. Hell, they'd be statistically likely to guess the right answer more often than to spew something like that.


Oh man, I wanna quote that thing and put it on my sig. Print it and laminate it and carry it everywhere I go.

We had more than two suns in our galaxy- I Agree.

 

Mercury(black sun)is the first Sun, still full of radiation. Our own second Sun is at the edge from our galaxy.

 

Do you ever think about what you are going to write before you actually write it?

I seems that you are just putting down random words strung together devoid of any meaning.

 

For me it's common logic. I probably think different like others.