Zero Point Theory - the universal constant Gravity

I have been trying to get rid of my layman ways, and I did a recalculation of what I think the mass of the Eridanus Void would be if it was a black hole. I got about 7.6 x 10^27 kg, I checked a web page that say that the visable matter in the universe is 6 x 10^51 kg.
http://people.cs.umass.edu/~immerman/stanford/universe.html
This just from assuming that the density is 1,000 kg/m^3. That it is a "blob of water". I think it may be more accurate mass of the void, since water is not able to be contracted very well by pressure(and is used in hydraulics systems), and this force comes mainly from the electromagnetic field. The mass of the universe would then be then be almost the mass of the void the mass of the void number of times. In other words, I think it would only come to being about the square root of the mass of the universe.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

and if it were a blackhole we would not be able to perceive it. or see it.
Black holes can only be determined by Hawking radiation or by the movement of bodies of mass around it...if I am not mistaken....
and clearly this image demonstrates that the void is visible by absence of information an not the existance of information [ as there appears to be absolutely no information within the void]

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

And that is why it is considered an anomoly of significant proportions as it woud have to be the only object in the universe that is at absolute rest... and that is supposed to be impossibe even according to zero point theory... which is why it is a signifcant anomoly to zero point theory and physics generally.


and emotionally,
just the mere thought of it makes you feel sick. [ and that feeling is worth trusting IMO]

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The thing is the void is over a billion light years in diameter. Thats an awful lot of non-space with out any information at all.....in fact it is a sizeable percentage of the entire visible universe. and that is most disturbing. And the fact that is depicted in the images as a near perfect sphere just confirms the feeling of wanting to puke...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Did a search of the University of Minnesota's data base and found this link and others worth a peek.

to read more>>>
http://www1.umn.edu/news/features/2007/UR_150001_REGION1.html

 

Like I mentioned earlier, I read some theoretical work on suppermassive black holes before they where discovered, (I think in an attempt to describe the motion of the Milky Way, where a suppermassive black hole would be at the center of the Milky Way). The theory on suppermassive black holes predicts that the suppermassive black hole in the center of our galaxy is about the size of a solar system. Then the critical mass of a body this large would be close to one. The density can be lower for a black hole this size to reach the critical mass needed to have a Schwarzchild Radius. Like in a neutron star, where electrons join together with protons to make a body of only neutrons, it is possible that neutrons cannot sustain the preasures on them. Then if most of the energy from this nuclear reaction ended up in the form of electrons, then the density where electrons have shown to sustain the most force is one. Electrons are less massive than neutrons, and they repel each other strongly with the electromagnetic force. In theory it assumes that the electromagnetic force is repeling the Schwarzchild Radius. The neutrons are broken down and form other particles that can not stay in as dense of a state. It would be like it was made of electron soup, electrons packed so densley together that it makes a "watery substance".

 

nice theoretics... you should start a thread on it...

 

I would if you care to discuss it. I think it comes down to when particles break down to their more fundemental components, they start to react more strongley with the magnetic field. This makes that bath of particles repel each other more with the electromagnetic force. This change in density could then increase the Schwarzchild Radius. So then in this way, from the change in density, the electromagnetic force can repel the force of gravity. That would then make the Black Hole larger. Ironically, looking at the link I gave, http://people.cs.umass.edu/~immerman/stanford/universe.html , the required mass of a closed universe is 6 x 10^27 kg/m^3, putting the estimated mass of the void 7.6 x 10^27 kg just over what it would need to be its own closed universe.

 

possibly one day it may be worth discussing but at the moment some basic premises need to be established IMO. example: the methodology for calculating the universe mass is subject to serious concerns.
So thanks but no thanks.

 

To help further clarify the notion of zero point being the Center of Gravity and what this means regarding 4 dimensional space distances:

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You can see that the distance between COG's is zero as all COG's are the same zero point.

the following image explains the nature of gravitational forces according to Zero Point Theory.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

where gravity is the need for 4 dimensional space to collapse back to zero dimension.
There are no gravitons or material mechanisms involved, merely the volume of 4 dimensional space collapsing to the absolute zero of the centre of Gravity [COG] and restrained from doing so by the existance of time [ energy ]

 

This image describes, that the attraction of gravity is always towards the culminant zero point [ Lagrangian point] as the masses COG attempts to collapse 4 dimensional space.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

According to ZPT, as far as Time is concerned it must therefore be absolute and not relative for Gravitational forces. [This is evidenced by the reality of Lagrangian point theory when extended to all moving bodies of mass Universally regardless of the distance of mass separation.]

 

You're explaining the quantum theory. The greater the distance between planets, the greater the forces between them to hold them together. When the distance between planets increase the magnetic forces decrease. The magnetic core and masses between planets determine the distance among them. The risk about quantum theory is when the planets are inline, like the turning of a bicycle wheel. When the forces between planets are ok it's like the turning gearwheels of an old fashion clock, quantum mechanism.

 

In some ways you are correct. The theory was heavily inspired by the sheer reality of Quantum Entanglement. [QM] It was just taking the rational and working on the premise that all things of mass are entangled thus affording a mechanism that allows Gravity to be a constant and providing a mechanism for inertia [Apparent independence yet absolute dependance simultaneously]
Zero Point Theory attempts to describe that mechanism and answer the why it works and not just that it does work.

 

Currently due to circumstances beyond my control the web site zeropointtheory.com is unable to be published on ANY server the files are placed on.

edit: the web site is now available.

Some images published in this thread that are dependent on the domain function are no longer able to be displayed. [I have attempted to move image files so that they remain visible in this thread]
If any images are missing let me know.
we shall try this:

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

View attachment 6154