James R's Independent Review Process

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by Gustav, Jul 1, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 8 of 18
  1. leopold

    leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    i would like for my ban for "intellectual dishonesty" be expunged.
    trippy never demonstrated the reason for the ban and i have asked him twice.
     
    leopold, Sep 10, 2011
    #141

  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Captain Kremmen

    Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    Are you sure all you said was:

    "mmph
    trippy playing the innocent"    ?

    And what were you doing with a bee?
    (mentioned by superstring when banning you)

    If you were being cruel to it, you deserved the ban.
     
    Captain Kremmen, Sep 10, 2011
    #142

  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Captain Kremmen

    Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    Sounds like libel to me.
    Sue the ass off him.
     
    Captain Kremmen, Sep 10, 2011
    #143

  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    First off he didn't ask, he demanded, actually he made a statement:
    "you will now demonstrate my intellectual dishonesty."

    Then he complained about the fact that I hadn't responded in a thread that has subsequently locked.

    He complained about the fact that I hadn't replied, even though I had subsequently been online - apparently he is of the opinion that replying to him should have been the first, and single thing that I did. He PM'd me at 2.30pm on the 29th, and was complaining about it on 10am on the 30th (local time).

    I pointed out to him that he had made a statement, not asked a question (if he can't be bothered to use proper punctuation and grammar, that's his lookout), and also pointed out that I thought I had made my position on the matter perfectly clear in the thread in question.

    He responded by reproducing the PM in full, linking to the thread in question, and complaining that I had not demonstrated anything in the thread.

    To which I naturally responded by first illustrating how the full text of the PM only supported my assertions, that he made a statement, rather than a request, and pointing out that I hadn't actually claimed to have proven anything, only that I had made my position on the matter clear (the implication of which is that somebody else made a post which I considered a sufficient demonstration to take action on, and had at least alluded to that in the thread in question). I then pointed out that strictly speaking the discussion between leopold and myself was off topic, and suggested that Tiassa might want to split it off into its own thread.

    At which point leopold asserted that he had asked me twice to explain myself, complained that I hadn't, and suggested that things would be different if I were held accountable for my actions.

    The threads in question are:
    weather control
    And:
    Thread and posts disappearing
     
    Trippy, Sep 10, 2011
    #144
  8. leopold

    leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    if your ego wants to interpret that statement that way then go for it.
    i fail to find the word "demand" in the above statement.
    uh, how does one reply to a locked thread trippy?
    after the thread was locked i never mentioned anything else about this.
    i want james and plasma both to read this quote of yours trippy, then i hope they fire you for it.
    yes, quite right. you also stated you don't remember demonstrating my intellectual dishonesty in that thread.
    another load of BS. i stated i didn't see where you demonstrated my ID and you stated you didn't demonstrate it.

    this makes the third attempt by me to get a demonstration of my "illegality".
     
    leopold, Sep 10, 2011
    #145
  9. Varda

    Varda The Bug Lady Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,184
    Trippy, would you be so kind as to demostrate leopold's intellectual dishonesty in the post that cost him a ban?
     
    Varda, Sep 10, 2011
    #146
  10. Gustav

    Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    trippy, dont
    this is a thread for james to review infractions

    varda, if you have none of your own, fuck off
     
    Gustav, Sep 10, 2011
    #147
  11. leopold

    leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    gee gustav i'm sorry i interrupted the little jerk you got going on with james.
    well then, lets have james take a shot at this then.
    sorry james, gustav forced the situation.
     
    leopold, Sep 10, 2011
    #148
  12. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Having the word 'demand' in the statement is not a pre-requisite for it to be considered one. If you recall, I originally said that it was a statement that was contextually a demand, either way it is still not a request.

    That's not what the statement:
    means, leopold.
    sub·se·quentAdjective/ˈsəbsəkwənt/
    1. Coming after something in time; following.
    In otherwords "Then he complained about the fact that I hadn't responded in a thread that was locked after he posted."

    So you think that your use of grammar and punctuation is at least reasonable, do you?

    No, that's not what I actually said.
    Here's what I actually said:
    In other words, I don't recall claiming that I had demonstrated your intellectual dishonesty in that thread, the only claim I made was the same thing I have reiterated here, that is that I felt it had been adequately demonstrated in the thread.

    No, it is a precise and accurate summation of the events between yourself and myself in the thread the Varda started. And again, you miss the crucial point in amongst all of this, I also stated that I felt it had been adequately demonstrated

    Strictly speaking it represents your second complaint about my lack of response to your PM.

    In this case, as is often the case (for me at least) the ban (seriously, how many bands have I ever handed out?) wasn't just about a single post, there is no single post of Leopolds that I can point to and say "this is what he was banned for", on the other hand, as I have suggested several times now, it has, none the less, been (I feel) adequately demonstrated within the thread.

    I wasn't particularly planning on it, I feel I've said all I need to say, and leopold has yet to come up with what I would consider to be a compelling demonstration of why I should say more than I have.
     
    Trippy, Sep 11, 2011
    #149
  13. leopold

    leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    because you have NEVER demonstrated my intellectual dishonesty trippy.
    in case you need help with the definition:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_dishonesty

    the thread where my alleged intellectual dishonesty occurred:
    http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=109508

    oh, BTW:
     
    leopold, Sep 11, 2011
    #150
  14. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Quote me, just once, claiming I had?

    The only thing I have claimed is that it has been demonstrated.
     
    Trippy, Sep 11, 2011
    #151
  15. leopold

    leopold Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    17,455
    that's my point.
    and for the 4th or 5th time WHERE?

    this is over the fucking top bullshit.
     
    leopold, Sep 11, 2011
    #152
  16. Varda

    Varda The Bug Lady Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,184
    I made a thread just for you, Leo. You've been posting this shit in every thread. Go there and stop pissing everywhere. please?
     
    Varda, Sep 11, 2011
    #153
  17. Captain Kremmen

    Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    @ James. The idea behind this thread is good, which you have affirmed by your posting on it.
    But it needs a few rules.
    Otherwise people will keep posting the same old bones of contention till everyone is sick of reading them.

    @Gustav. It's your thread. Do you think any rules should be introduced, or should things be left as they are?
     
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2011
    Captain Kremmen, Sep 14, 2011
    #154
  18. Captain Kremmen

    Captain Kremmen All aboard, me Hearties! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    12,738
    Well, that killed that thread.
     
    Captain Kremmen, Sep 15, 2011
    #155
  19. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    It's worse than that he's dead Jim,
    Dead Jim,
    Dead Jim,
    It's worse than that he's Dead Jim,
    Dead Jim,
    DEAD!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FCARADb9asE
     
    Trippy, Sep 15, 2011
    #156
  20. Ostracon

    Ostracon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    19
    What this forum needs, if I may be a bit presumptuous, is more blandness and mediocrity. Someone who reflect the common man in both mind and form.

    You know, someone who repeats the modern myths in exactly the right tone of voice, and who has the appearance of a woman morphing into a man, and the psychology to prove it.

    Censorship has been used in every era by sexually repressed brainless twits since the beginning of history. each claimed to be current and in touch with reality and each had that dull character of an accountant.

    That safe environment bred boredom should not surprise anyone who understand the world.
    But that in that sheltering dullness the least interesting should find a place in positions of administrative authority only a few can fully grasp.

    Consider this forum a microcosm of a macrocosm.
    Same fertilizer.
     
    Ostracon, Sep 15, 2011
    #157
  21. Bells

    Bells Staff Member

    Messages:
    24,270
    Like this?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXMscFD4-Ho&feature=player_embedded#!
     
    Bells, Sep 17, 2011
    #158
  22. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    If you're so uncommon, why do you keep coming back? As the superman that you so obviously are, you really ought to create your own superforum or something. Oh wait - you've tried that, haven't you? How is it working out for you? Any members other than yourself?
     
    James R, Sep 17, 2011
    #159
  23. Gustav

    Gustav Banned Banned

    Messages:
    12,575
    it appears james r wants to review a post authored almost a year ago by me


    naturally i had no idea what it meant so i had to look it up again
    i found a translation here
    according to the website "gaand chaat mera, lund chuse" means "kiss my ass, cocksucker"

    the person i was addressing, indiancurry2010, has been inactive since.......

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    ....5-10-11 and the last post in that thread occured on 04-16-11, 09:22 AM so i wonder who complained. james?? is your grudge that all- consuming that you have to go back almost a year, to a response towards an inactive poster in order to fuck with me? really?


    you need help.
    why a 3 day ban? learn your own goddamn hindi

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!




    oh
    you defend the curry freak because you share similar sentiments? you are bigoted towards the chinese? my chinese heritage?

    perhaps you had one too many drinks and are sloshed out of your mind?

    /snicker
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2011
    Gustav, Oct 5, 2011
    #160
Page 8 of 18
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page