Backgrounds in moderation

Well you did say you were here to answer questions.. Didn't you?

Do you know the difference between "the" and "I" and "you"?

I have explained it clearly. Did you not read it?

And what attitude James?

Who do you think you're talking to when you demand I 'drop that attitude'?

So you have proof that the people who were at the time rampaging through the streets were also reading sciforums at the same time and getting advice from Gustav? Talk about multi-tasking!

It always was about you James.

Then again, you apparently don't read threads..

Sam's lead?

How exactly?

What is Sam's lead, exactly? And how can you claim to be fair and competent when you can come out and accuse people of following "sam's lead", whatever that is?

Aren't we all.

So now you "skimmed it"..

I haven't read those posts. I'm not sure where they are. ​

Very different to your earlier claim of not having read them and not even knowing where they are. Which is it?

Maybe you skimmed the post you hadn't read..?

Yes.. I've gone to the darkside.

We have cookies!

I never said you did say it James.

I was taking a leaf out of your book and having some fun..

You know.. running with it..

So..

You earlier said you did not read it and did not know where it was.

Now you are saying that you skimmed the posts you saw, including my "melodramatic resignation" post - was in the thread you started to discuss the issue of the leaflet..

Now, you are giving the impression that I started a thread and had a melodramatic kind of fit and reesigned..

You claimed you had not read the posts in your thread (that you started by moving posts around dealing with the issue), and you claimed you apparently did not know where said posts were. You apparently responded and commented on what had been said in said posts (the very posts you had apparently not read and did not know where they were).. Now you are saying you skimmed it..

So we know you know what was said because you did comment on resignation, the fight that was ongoing at the time, the comments that came out... You commented on all of that.. in other words, the very things that were in that thread..

Also James. I posted my resignation BEFORE you posted that 'hold your horses' post, saying that we shouldn't be resigning, etc. Not after.

Can I give you some advice? Get your story straight before you try and establish a timeline.

Well seeing that you are the bastion of fairness, I expect you to let me take care of him as you know I can.

Oh, I know why it's a private forum.

Hence why I'm not posting names or anything to give too much away.

You're so cute when you're coy!

*Pinches cheeks*

Again.. it's your thread that you "skimmed"..

You know, the very thread you advised everyone was being discussed and looked into about the matter?

I thought you hadn't read it and didn't know where it was James?

And Drama Queen now!

Excellent.

James, right now, this is so obscene, I wouldn't even know where to begin.

Hmmm..

Of course you do..

You brought it up. I responded with "hmmm" because I was not going to say a single actual word about your personal life. You queried why I said "hmmm" and I told you that it was a "hmmm" which was 'I'm not saying a word about your personal life on this forum'.. when you asked..

So you accuse me and tell me I 'keep bringing them up' and accused me of doubting what you do?

Are you mad?

You mean the rioters who had stopped rioting and were busily accessing sciforums?

And I have asked, like 100 times now, can you cite proof that the criminals were accessing this site and reading the news reports we were posting in that thread?

Read what I said again..

Well they can be the moderator that supported you when you originally banned Gustav. ​

 

Ah Geoff..

You can mention it to James in your PM's.

No.

I asked you what exactly it was you wanted.

No. You just queried the qualifications a lawyer like me could have in moderating that sub-forum. Well you got the reshuffling around you demanded.

And you are the absolute last person to say anything about 'hypersensitivity and double standards'. Really, the last.

Guess which side you belong to Geoff.

Take a guess..

No Geoff.

You got the forum you want.

Enjoy it and enjoy the 'reshuffle' you requested.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

And you can stop sucking up now. Show them your qualifications. There's one forum in the offing for you. Take it with my blessing. You sound just like what they are looking for.

 

Can I ask? Why are you inserting yourself in something that does not concern you at all?

No, seriously, why?

Nope. I told you that you got the forums you asked for. That it is the members who direct where we go. I also asked you what specifically you had in mind. Or who you felt was better qualified for your "reshuffle"..

Since you seemed unable to actually articulate what exactly it was you wanted, with moderators, admin and members alike asking you, I asked you as well.

I did not call you "a nasty". I advised you that as Tiassa said, and as was corroborated by James, this place is what the members make of it.. I also queried you desire for more scientific content in light of what you post in Human Science yourself..

Okay. I think I need to establish something because you seem a tad confused.

My stepping down had nothing to do with you.

You were nowhere near my mind when I decided to step down. You did not factor in my thoughts when I made that decision.

This thread did not cause me to step down. Nor did your desire for a "reshuffle" induce me to step down.

This has nothing to do with you.

So again, can I ask why you are inserting yourself into an issue that does not concern you at all but is actually between myself (personally) and James and the moderators and the few members involved?

What forum did I impose exactly?

Human Sciences?:bugeye:

Don't worry Geoff, the rubber hose I beat the posters with there is really soft on the skin..

Oooookay...

So you are here to say 'take that!' for something something?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

You know, you obviously have your own axe to grind with me, kind of obvious really. Considering I have barely said anything to you for months, I responded to you directly in this thread because you named me specifically in this thread and I asked you what you wanted and was quite polite about it, my comments that it is the members who make the forum was not just me, but also originally said to you by Tiassa and also supported by James...

What exactly do you want from me Geoff?

No, seriously, what? You insert yourself now in something that has absolutely nothing to do with you and then act like the victim when I don't really take you seriously?

Is this your version of 'ding dong the witch is dead'? I posted a farewell thread in Human Science. You're welcome to air your grievances that my forum apparently imposed on you there..

Otherwise, short of asking you if you've had a few too many drinks, I bid thee farewell..