WHY does anything exist?

With the way you feel all perfectly placed with your "absolute" certainty, you must insult others quite often.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I do. But it's nothing to do with "absolute certainty".
Try re-reading your own posts: the vast majority is unfounded speculation, from which you appear to draw conclusions that you take as fact.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

They always get frustrated and then turn to personal attack D; probably because they take the realisation one gives them that blind belief is BS personally?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yes, I have a PhD in nothing.

And I also have something.

What are the possible sources for the basic somethings?

 

I could read and re-read them a thousand times and find nothing of interest other than what you personally find interesting. I have taken the best of your unfounded speculation as an "absolute" fact.Here From this point on from your own speculation your just denying yourself a gift you can give yourself. It is a title to be held with utmost pride a title someone else can place upon you. It is called the Ubermensche and I mean this without deception as truly one such as yourself who believes we are neither a slave nor a master of the universe is deserving of this title.

 

I concur.

My unfounded speculation? Really?

More inane drivel.
Without support.

 

So start looking around at everything you can see in your proximity. Count your material possessions for their value as elements as opposed to objects of contention and desire. You may call me a liar, but you do not desire the same as I inquire. In which case it is useless to argue with a man who can't stand behind his own words.

Yes. When you stated no person has seen the extremely high energy levels present at the time of the BB, I believed you. The antimatter mold for the elements looks just the same upon speculation.

Within every possible viable point within the universe, there exists a particle small enough yet powerful enough to be its own universe. We can say this with absolute certainty.

Anything exists because recursive physical actions within the universe brought on the storage of dark energy's compounding information as a denser substance known as matter. The BB is when that compounded information ran against more compounded information. The universe is akin to a giant living thing sending information quickly around itself in order to carry out functions..

 

everything exists based on the idea that the universe is part of a larger picture, maybe as some have thought in the past, an electron or proton, something with a charge, maybe a neutron, and everything within the universe dictates the course of action for whatever greater entity we inhabit, for example say the world has more bad than good, average that towards every action/reaction throughout the universe based solely on the basis of prolification, we become an electron with a negative charge, one step closer to extinction,or say everythings great everywhere, we start spinning faster and stronger, and we're a proton, with a bright future, could explain us, and kind of explains ions, in a nonsensical "kinda gives me the idea of it" sort of way anyway, in either case the actions of only the humans on earth wouldn't effect the outcome of the universe, so don't try this at home but maybe parallel universes affect us in more ways than we know, imagine the synapses in your brain responding to anything, imagine it is the electrical charge flowng through them that affects the mentality of the decisions behind them, and each one based on the smaller universes inhabiting the atoms within the chemicals in the synapses, what i mean is, maybe their all synchronized on a molecular level, hence the name parallel, like mirros refracting light the make a spread of light.

 

Do you ever actually reply to the topic? Or comments addressed to you?

Um, that wasn't unfounded speculation. It was a fact.

You can say it with absolute certainty. But you'd be wrong.

Word salad. Meaningless, inane, unsupported drivel.

 

I do when considered relevant. Often your bothersome stances of complete doubt limit your ability to think clearly at times. You don't give in easily to the power of suggestion. This means you don't take advice well.

Not going to claim I put words in your mouth on that issue.. Now that is certainly interesting.

Well then I guess we should eliminate singularity out of all relativity as a concept. Since you are absolutely certain I am wrong.

Alright then it exploded from no actual materials and just became what it is today.

How is this I'll just keep posting possibilities for you to decline until we find something deeper and experimentally viable within this conversation. Or we could make this object and see for ourselves the high energy levels.

 

Really? Examples please.

That would be incorrect. I consider advice, and make up my own mind as to its worth. Sometimes I take it, sometimes I don't.

Huh? You linked to a post that supposedly showed an unfounded speculation on my part. It didn't.

Er right. What are you talking about?

That is one possible explanation.

What "object"?

 

wrong assumption.

Wrong.

The one we haven't made, the whole point behind this exercise is for you to notice a single assimilated object that has been previously explained to "not be in existence" and at the very least try to imagine it.

 

It's not an assumption. Keep trying.

Actually, no.

"Exercise"?
What do you mean by "assimilated"?
I think you're in the wrong thread...

 

A sample of the essential communication between Dywyddyr and NietzscheHimself:

[...]
Dywyddyr: Wrong.
NietzscheHimself: Wrong.
Dywyddyr: Wrong.
NietzscheHimself: Wrong.
Dywyddyr: Wrong.
NietzscheHimself: Wrong.

[days later]
Dywyddyr: Wrong.
NietzscheHimself: Wrong.
Dywyddyr: Wrong.
NietzscheHimself: Wrong.

...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Well duh!
At least we aren't being over-wordy and complicated!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

You said. Nobody has seen "it". I said we were and are part of it; therefore we have seen it and your left with an assumption. But still humanity is yet to make it for themselves. It is but a tool for showing how the universe works.

Though BB does answer the question it is still a word used to dodge the explanation of how out of nothing came the beautiful and mysterious appearance of matter. The BB explains how matter came about, but it does not mention the elementary principals involved with this type of occurrence taking place. Nothing is mentioned to have been the cause.

To see what it sees. I told you to measure the value of something. Something priceless.

Thinking inside the box. All 108 or so of them and start playing spot the difference. All access pass to anything and everything not immediately visible.

 

Um, no. The assumption is yours. We haven't seen it. All you've done is make vague hand-wavy claims.

Again, incorrect. It has been shown that one possible cause was actually nothing. As stated.

Aaand we're back to inane drivel.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

So, would it be fair to say by now that we all agree that the question the OP poses is meaningless?

 

Meaningless in regards to the resulting chit chat.

 

Oh that goes without saying, but I did specify that I was referring to the OP itself...