What are the questions science cannot answer?

so tell us why (and not how)

ditto above

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

just see
science doesn't even have a monopoly on all "what" questions

(although "what is the meaning" is basically a definition of "why" ... so go figure)

Only because you think your emotional state is the pinnacle of scientific reasoning ... which is hardly scientific in the real sense

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Why not?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Since you think whatever you think is absolute there's no arguing with you then is there?

 

Doesn't stop people from tryin'...

Do you know me well enough to make such an assumption? It appears that answer to that question is, "no."

 

Didn't say I know you I was only making an observation.

 

I think you need to learn how to make better observations.

For one thing, "Absolutes" don't exist in Science.
And there ARE certain things I believe in. Even if they are not spiritual.

But when it comes to logic, critical thinking and being rational, one must weigh observation against plausibility.

Simply because I speak out against irrational thought, dishonest tactics, irrational justification of beliefs or religious arrogance, does not mean that I think that anything I think is absolute.

Rather, this strikes me as a fearful approach on your part. You cannot disregard the validity of my statements, so you attack my character instead.
You think you made an observation? No... Don't lie to yourself. You can lie to me all you want-- but be honest with yourself at least.
One cannot make proper observations when influenced by personal bias.

 

I wasn't being personal or biased, I was only making a valid observation so stop overreacting.

 

Ok, then.

 

A guide for the perplexed.

Once, science never existed in a finite universe. Before science emerged, the universe had to be existant; thereafter there was still no science. Like one cannot issue a parking fine when cars never existed; in this case, the car fines emerge after the law is established relating to car fines; here, the laws relating to car fines is the analogy to what science constitutes: the observation of laws, which emerged before science, while the laws emerged after the universe emerged.

The equation is: universe; universal laws; science.

The ToE error places the last as the first, in effect proclaiming the car manual proves there is no car maker. Then they call Genesis, which introduced science and evolution, and placing these premises in their correct poisiton, as myth. But compare - Genesis says:

V1. First emerged the universe, and that it is finite.

V2. No laws existed at this point [Formless; lawless].

V3. Then the formless was turned to form [Laws emerged].

V4. Then came the first action - based on V3 above.

V5. SCIENCE: The observation of the already existing laws in action.

Remove a single factor in the above equation, and science dies.

 

as usual you are misquoting just to make yourself feel smarter..

i said i was THE ONE!

 

Would you like to borrow my salad shooter for that word salad?

Just because scientists were not around in the past to present a model of the universe, doesn't mean that when scientists were around, they could not observe the Universe and build a model.

 

You were not even THE one. You admitted you were talking to 2, remember? That means you were THE ONE + 2.

Genesis is not only the greatest science writ on the planet, but also the greatest mathematical document: show us another writing with millions of numbers, dates, names, distances and events strewn across its verses - and no error?! Those who subscribe to such a document as made up by some desert wondering Israelites are far too generous - or totally incredibly naive.

 

Scientists were around. They declared the universe is finite, invented the oldest and most accurate calendar, introduced Monotheism, all world accepted laws, the exact date for speech endowed humans, separated medicine from occultism for the first time, recorded humanity's earliest history - and all in the world's first alphabetical book. Thou shall not confuse the Hebrew bible with the Gospels and Quran with your salad shooter!

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I says:

Huh! What's with the latin name!? Was JC a Roman Christian?

You just showed who is stupid.

DON'T BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU BELIEVE.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Maybe, but it was funny.

 

The use of a latin name says the Gospels was written far from ground zero, centuries later, by Romans who could not speak hebrew - faking their guile to offset a holocaust they comitted in 70 CE - and forgot to mention this in their sacred writings. I tried, then gave up looking for proof of a single verse of the Gospels - its like looking for pineapples on Mars.

The tragedy for humanity is they call the Hebrew bible old, fullfilled away and transcended - when only the reverse is manifest. Islam emulated this formular, resulting in 3.5 Billion humans being wrong but genuine in their beliefs - or 14 Million Jews being wrong and even more genuine in their belief. Therefor it says:

'YOU SHALL NOT FOLLOW A CORRUPT MULTITUDE'. [Pivotal democrasy foundational law].

Sadaam Husein beat Arafat's 96% votes by achieving 100% votes. That's Greek style democrasy which does not include the pivotal factor of the Hebrew democrasy - but which predates the Greek. That's what Europe did to you - go blame the Jews and dump all theologies in one green bag - then go winking in the dark.

 

because you just offered one of course

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

click link for more similarly unbiased observations

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!