Heres a point, if you could identify what you were inside and taking a photo of, it would no longer be a UFO.
I think the ghosts that live next door have some. Cosmic, that is probably the least unidentified "flying object" in existence! Everybody recognises the Seaview. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
But , to me, it is a UFO for I nor anyone I've known have actually seen it flying around where we live. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Um, if you haven't seen it then it it isn't a UFO because, quite simply, it hasn't been observed at all. So you couldn't say it was an object or flying...
^ can one of you two explain Schrodingers Cat to me easily? My revelation is that it is undetermined rather the cat is dead or alive in the box with cyanide unless the box is opened. Is that right? The cat is considered both dead and alive inside the box? TIA
That's the usual interpretation. Here is a reasonable explanation. What isn't generally taught is that Schrödinger wasn't actually proposing this (as being "true") at all, he was pointing out what he saw as the absurdity of the Copenhagen Interpretation and used reductio ad absurdum to highlight this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger's_cat#The_thought_experiment
Thanks Dyw. I did all those links by myself and came up with that 'usual' understanding. PS. I been inside a UFO. It was in a dream. The UFO was however what seemed to be like a computer chip. Im an alien from outerspace that has crash landed here on Earth Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I am sorry, but this question makes absolutely no sense and is in fact impossible. Did you mean: Does anyone have photos taken while inside of an alien spacecraft ?
I've always thought it should be called an IFO instead because it is an Identified Flying Object not Unidentified.
The current terminology is UAP anyway (Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon), because UFO pre-supposes that it's an actual object and that it's actually flying.