Wrong again. Statistics come from a prepared controlled study - to make sure that little tiny things like bias don't come into it. Then I suggest you actually find some genuine statistics rather rely on your own twisted perspective and find out the truth.
insecurities? :shrug: What insecurities? I been fat and I lost that fat and now I am lean. Because I never accepted that fat and beautiful goes together. The sooner one realizes that pampering oneself and staying cool with blobs of fat hanging of here and there is OK and is somehow beautiful, well the sooner they do something about the better! I am now secure about my body but not on sex issues. I need sex badly and I tried to do it with this fat chick who also is an Americans...:shrug:...and it failed because apparently her legs were to tired to be in that position and she just had to rest. And getting inside of her was pain too...it was more of a fat tunnel. Ah, the pain.
Life is a controlled study of one's life. And how exactly would anyone do a controlled study on the effect of fat in women between men and women relationships? :shrug: Do you have resources for these that show that everything is cool and sleek as it should be and no issues whatsoever?
I see you've now extended your ignornace to statistics, sciense and life as well. No it isn't. That's not up to me: you're the one making assertions. Back them up or shut up. More of of your La La Land wishful thinking. What do you mean by "as it should be"?
so what you are saying is that you were insecure with yourself when you were fat and getting lean left you with the problem of not being able to find a woman who would have sex with you. Did you ever stop to think that needing to stop and rest was just her excuse to get you off of her. Maybe you weren't providing her with good sex...just maybe the reason you are not getting enough sex is because in your haste to loose wieght you forgot to learn how to please a woman.
I see that relationship between a man and a woman should be one or limited to one. The goal is to have a long lasting relationship were both the man and a woman don't just live together for three years and than when his finances go down the drain, she goes off...or her body no longer satisfies him, he starts cheating on her. The way it should be, a man and a woman neither had tons of boyfriends/girlfriends in their past and they are happily ever married with kids planned and finances just for the kids' future. That is as it should be.
Woman listen! I only started having sex when I got lean, I would never have a woman put up with my fat body and make her suffer in sex. I reached my goal and got lean for the sole purpose of having sex where I would please her, but she was too tired and could not perform for me.
What do you mean "should be"? Who decided that? Whose goal? Why do you think that's the goal? One more time: what do you mean by "should be"? Who made that rule? Who decided that's how it "should be"?
I am barely 23 years old and I am not ready to get married because I have not achieved total financial security. Meaningless sex? I want to find a girl and love her with my heart not just my dick. But I am in a country where women are hard to love.
well obviously you're probably all cozy and enjoying fruits of loom, pleasures of life, because you achieved the goals of your life and now looking at desperate and needy as entertainment of us as puppets to you. Ay, not so?
ok, just so I have this correct, your sole purpose for getting lean was to have sex...I'm sorry but am I the only one who sees something wrong with that. I mean really. Get lean for your health, get lean for your own self esteem, but to have to get lean to have sex. Doesn't say much about you as a human being does it. I mean if you were someone worthy of a woman's sexual desires it would be for the person you are not the body you think you have.
Hell no. My life is bitter and I work all the time and nothing goes to plan. That's why a thread about slagging is so enjoyable. Because it isn't me. So, you're half right, anyway.