Why does evolution select against atheists?

Your posts do little but detract from science AND scientists.

Wrong again. You're assuming that you're correct (on zero evidence). And by sticking to a belief you're ignoring the facts. As usual.

You're the one that doesn't think.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What could you possibly mean by that? Do you have an example? Please enlighten us with a link...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Everyone is left to his own conclusion on this.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Well that is very easy, there is a human kind, and animal kinds, plant kinds.

 

Humans are animals my good sir

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

................

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

................

 

Ha ha this does show that thinking ability of some.

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

did someone say that alread?

 

Not legally.:bugeye:

 

Whats up Doc.....

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Are we talking about this in a legal sense? I must have missed that.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Oh I don't know, we could cull people where they overpopulate too, I guess

It would make things so much easier if people were designated as animals. They could find a biological basis for everything they did.

 

Oh no please don't cull me........

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Just think of it as natural selection.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

"Th-Th-Th-Th-Th-... That's all, folks."

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Laws are country specific. In what countries are humans defined to not be animals in the law? Perhaps you are just saying that many laws are applied to humans only? Seldom is a non-human animal judged by a court before being killed by an officer of the law, but it does happen that a non-human animal gets its day in court. Usually, it is some rich person's dog that has bit a child.

Likewise, humans also can be judged to not be responsible for a crime they clearly have committed. It seems to me that the line between non human and human animals is very blurred, at least in principle, if not in practice.

Certain rights are only legally granted to humans by the law. For example, a donkey can not vote, but back in the 1800s one was elected as governor of Kansas, as I recall reading. If being allowed to vote is a privilege of humans only, then until about 100 years ago in USA, women were only animals, not human.

 

In that case, will you be campaigning for equal rights of suffrage for the donkey?

 

only if it is a male.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!