US air strikes kill 140 civilians in Afghanistan, including 93 children

Because those governments that they 'want' often pose a threat to that region or sometimes the whole world. And (I hate it for you but) the West will not tolerate those regimes. Look at Saddam, he got unruly and started threatening the region, so look what we did. Hopefully the Taliban members are next. I hope Pakistan ruins their shit somethin proper.

IF
But they're not. So why all the hypothetical bullshit?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The airstrikes are not by the Taliban. The dead children are really dead. Thats perspective.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

There you have your answer.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Well, you see, you can't translate the English instructions into Arabic, the instructions that said for them to NOT hide behind the children.

Oh well...

 

Don't worry, its not reached 500,000 yet. The price is till waiting to be worth it.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Gee, I guess they soon won't have any more children to hide behind. What will they do?

 

Why you can pick up the remains of the children and secular humanise them to death!

 

So long as the Taliban fire a single bullet from a school, wedding, village.

It is perfectly legal to bomb that area.

Because of the fact that the instant a neutral target shoots at the enemy the neutral target becomes a hostile target indefinitely.

 

Of course.

If you search under this kid, you'll find the militant it was worth burning him for

 

so long as that militant fired a single bullet it no longer matters if there is a kid there or not.

 

Clearly.

 

The few voices of sanity [which will be subdued in all those jerking off to the snuff videos of civilians dying]

http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/world/us_set_to_spend_100m_more_on_wars

 

If we had more troops in there, we might not have to use air power alone. But I guess you would call that evil too. If the Taliban should win, are we going to read you condemn their atrocities too? I doubt it.

 

I think what the Taliban will or will not do is irrelevant here:

"What is the number of dead and injured at which you will say: 'This can't go on'?"

 

How many do you have?

JK

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

,

But you see here, is that the Taliban are using them as human shields. So if anything they are defying international law.

 

So when your father comes home he is "using you as a human shield"? When your brother drops you to school, you're a "human shield"?

Does anyone realise how ludicrous the notion that people who are born in the villages that they die in are using their family as human shields by living there?

How can any educated thinking person buy this shipload of shit?

 

Im sorry but I have no idea what you mean by your two examples.

But the fact is that the Taliban operate in neutral zones, that means literally they are using human shields

 

If they "operate in neutral zones" why are they fighting the Afghan troops maintained by the puppet government ?

 

What does that have to do with the fact they are in neutral zones?

It doesnt make a difference, neutral is neutral.

 

They don't buy YOUR shipload of shit.