Segregation and Ethnic cleansing as a democratic policy

This is an apparent expansionist move by the European Zionists to retain control of Palestinian occupied land and further dislocate native Palestinians from their lands. The Zionists destroyed an ancient Muslim graveyard in Jerusalem to build, get this, an Interfaith center, despite of pleas from Palestinian for moving it to another sight. Now, Israel has banned Muslim worshipers from visiting Masjid Al Aqsa and Bait al Maqdis, for fear it will incite Jews. They care nothing about the feelings of the Muslims of the city. Muslims have ruled Jerusalem for almost 1400 years, and yet they have never destroyed any Jewish sites, graveyards, or any Jewish neighborhoods. What the Zionists are doing in the Holy Land is an injustice, and they will have to eventually answer to God for their crimes. The Zionists may have the upper hand now, but realize the Palestinians will take back their rightful lands from the European Zionist immigrants.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Yeah, sure there is.

Oh, please.

What about building your temple to worship your gravel on top of the most holy spot they have?

What I can't figure out is why any one still cares. Can't you both anihalate each other and leave the rest of us in peace?

Sure you will. How about holding your breath until it happens?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So what is your claim. Please specify which building you are referring to, which building was destroyed, by whom, and provide proof as to the previous location of this building. I'm curious about this.

Obviously the West cares, as it is arming Israel to the teeth. Building them tractors to root up Palestinian farms, tanks to crush Palestinian homes, airplanes to bomb Palestinian cities, supplying chemical weapons (white phosphorous), and boycotting Palestinians of food, water, and medicine.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

If God didn't want it to be so, it wouldn't have happened, right? God must hate Palestinians.

 

God doesn't work like that in Islam. Don't confuse us with Christians.

 

It's the same God.

 

Used to be, before cannibalism became a requisite for salvation.

The People of the Book did not have a divine Christ or an idol whose flesh and blood they feasted on.

 

They didn't have a dude named Mohammed either, who wrote his own version of the bible.

 

Its smack dab in the center of the temple mount (the holiest site in Judaism), but of course you knew that. You could easily create a lot of good will with the Jews by simply moving your rocks else where.

Try reading what I said: "What I can't figure out is why any one still cares. Can't you both anihalate each other and leave the rest of us in peace?"

 

Ain't that the truth.

 

You didn't answer my questions. Who destroyed it, for what reason, in what era? Also, provide proof that it is located there. I always assumed the Israelis said the Temple of Solomon was located near the Western Wall, under Masjid al Aqsa, hence why they are carrying out excavations there at the horror of the global Islamic community. What right have the Zionists to destroy Muslim monuments to search for the ruins of a previous temple? You have not answered any of my questions, I have a feeling you don't even know this topic yourself.

 

... I am mildly amused, since if that were true and they were <i>reassured</i>, how would the possession of nuclear weapons be explained?

On the contrary, it is the backing and aid of the US that allows Israel to get away with many acts that, if carried out by any other country, would be condemned in the international arena.

Source: BBC News. (news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7420573.stm)

P.S: I am not defending/condemning either side, but I really think the self righteous attitude that Israel adopts, encouraged by U.S, is hindering peace processes as much as the obstinacy of radical parties (i.e. Hamas). Blaming either side is not going to work.. it's a bit of a chicken and egg problem.

 

That doesn't matter to religious nuts, as you should know. You worship three pieces of slag from hundreds of years ago. But you could move the slag else where. You have it on the temple mount just to provoke the Jews.

The same right you have to build temples on their holy places.

 

A seemingly legitimate point, but only if you have no knowledge of the history of the region. I'll ask you again: which site are you referring to, who destroyed it, what proof is there that there existed a Jewish site in this location? Furthermore, for someone who supposedly cares nothing about religious sites, you care much about Jewish sites and very little about Muslim sites, even though you don't know where they were supposedly located even.

 

Now for some revisionist history to make it all better.

Do I care about "holy" sites? No. But I don't pretend that no one cares or that only your faith matters.

I must admit though, worshiping slag is pretty funny. No wonder you guys are so touchy about it.

 

You still haven't answered his question.

 

Why should I, the history of the temple mount is freely available and he has no actual interst.

 

Yes, the history is freely available. I guess DH and I have both read it, which is why your statements make no sense to us. Feel free to answer the questions at any time.

 

He apparently hasn't so you explain it to him, or he could try wiki.

 

Why don't you explain it to me by answering the questions I asked you. They were straight-forward questions, you shouldn't have much trouble.