"Global Warming" is becoming "Climate Change"...surprise surprise

In your case, was I suppose to learn how to personally insult people ?
That's not very polite, and a poor method in debates, so I pass.

I've already stated why I think the term "Climate Change" is being used more now instead of "Global Warming".

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Thanks slacker - but in the main you are preaching to the choir.

I know the answer - and in fact every other poster with the exception of Cazzo on this thread appears to know the answer.

In contrast - Cazzo - even after having had the correct answer supplied to her on 4 occasions - still continued to give the wrong answer.

the count now is 6 correct explanations for the usage of the term, so I'm sure she has more than enough information to provide the correct answer to all of us and prove she is capable of assimilating data despite the fact that it contradicts her poorly thought through predjudices.

Care to take a step up Cazzo or are you gpoing to slink away in humiliated defeat like you usually do when we cross swords?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Perhaps if we killed 1/3 of all humans like the Communists did in Cambodia in the 1970s, and make the rest live in primitive conditions on Communist govt. controlled farms. Would that satisfy "Mother Earth" ?

You know there are alternatives if the human population gets too big, without killing people off. But that's probably a topic for a different thread.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

This whole threads been nothing but personal insults from you; there's no real point in responding to you anymore.

 

Clearly you are still in school - you may receive a low passing grade for remaining polite in the debate from your schoolteacher - however you still lost the actual argument - as usual - and guess what counts in the real world girly?
School may pass you - but the real world has just handed you a big fat F.

While you may have stated what your opinion is, it has been clearly pointed out to you that your opinion holds no basis in fact or reality - basically you just made it up - you then failed to defend it either by providing any factual evidence - or by rebutting the factual evidence that shows your opinion to be little more than your own fantasy.

If you're looking for an example of poor debating technique - that's the best one in the thread so far.

so - tell us the real reason why climate change is the preferred descriptive term?

 

LOL!

as if you were ever capable

exit stage left Cazzo - with her lousy lightweight intellect and fantasy derived predjudices intact

 

Patel,

Great! Im glad you guys understand this stuff.



Cazzo,

You are right, there are other ways than killing people. The NWO thinks it can control people... but ohhhhhh boy, martial law is going to be a big mess. We will probably be sterilized with food additives or food additives will just make us weak. Anything to achieve subservience.

The real truth is that people with a conscience see the problem and are acting to make the difference. We probably wont have mass genocide (is this the correct term for killing over-consumers and polluters????), but rather have a major social switch into more sustainable living. All of the facts are in and it is a matter of time before the public catches on to the movement.

 

Pogrom is probably a better word