Are you speaking from experience? Never, ever, have I had the reviewers from a journal try to claim my work as their own, nor have I had a journal adjust my work without my permission. These kind of things are the subject of b-grade movies, and not the type of thing that goes on in reputable journals. If you feel you have done something worthwhile, you should send it off to a reputable journal in a hope that they deem the work substantial enough to publish it. And for the record, I find the thread title and your opening post ignorant, arrogant and stupid - with increasing order of emphasis implied.
yep ... i learn from what has occurred over the last 100 years as for your opinion of the thread; don't care.... truth be known the knowledge was old before the community even comprehended what the protein was good for. ie... this thread was to share how stupid the community really is And i am on the same road in that i shared the actual comprehension of how mass and energy associate and within a context of biology sharing how the human brain works; do you think i give a hoot what you or the so called community thinks.... when the work was released 26 years ago. You people do not care about the comprehension all you care about it what it will do for you personally Do you remember my first post with you on how the potential increased from the apple falling from the latter? One minute you were intrigued the next you turned into an idiot. Not my fault, it was yours for not listening and doing the homework. If you want to learn about how mass and energy actually work; go study a little Tesla for a few months as he had the closest rendition that ever existed on this earth. ie... photoelectric patent before the Big E even thought about it So call me the ranting idiot.... i don't give a hoot the knowledge was sought for the good of our future, (even since the first publication) and not for being accepted if i wanted to be accepted i would publish; when the correct setting presents itself, then i will call upon a group of folk who will be able to release the material to all four corners of the globe equally. but if you really understood each item being presented then you would also know what that knowledge brings to mankind; and that is the most important aspect of the whole change; the ability for each person ever to be dropped on their head to finally have an owners manual true from the beginning to the ending and it never have a foundation based on beliefs.
Im not even arguing with you anymore. You are an OFFICIAL idiot. Its not magic, its quantum mechanics. The most accurate theory with the most accurate predictions in history. Whatever yo, I'm done here. Holla.
See what the community has done to the kids and it is the community and the ignorance of the complacent that did it. This integrity to fact is lost. This kid does not realize that QM and the conversion of energy in virial theorem is what created the idea of dark matter, dark energy and black holes, when not a one of them exist. i.e..... the observed data from telescopes does not fit the math of QM and why they 'created' the new forms. (so in the standard model the universe is comprised of over 75% of dark junk none on this earth has ever experienced) that is why i will not conform to the community! Who holds themselves responsible for the deception and misguidance? all the sciences in the world and still to this day, not a science book on this earth can share how the lipid bilayers of a single cell associate without peptide bonds. it is stupid easy... 'resonance' but no where in the sciences will this be shared some say it is the 'water and oil' ..... hydrophobic and hydrophilic affect........ how stupid can a rocket scientist be to ever support suggest or even build a rocket without finding out the mechanics behind life itself So fool, when you can show QM to define the basics of how life works, then you can bark... otherwise.......... go lay by your dish!
^ I hope you got my message. It was not rude or there was no pun intended, I just think you are in the wrong forums lol.
then you know that either i am completely whacked out of my mind; (which i question every day) or OH sh.it........ and the whole of this world is about to change. let's hope i am whacked!
Bishadi, do you have a job? I asked you before, you avoided answering. How do you manage to pay your bills?
Put the work to peer review One time in 82. Not since. As during this last quarter century it has been all study and fun. i.e... there is enough math to build the toys already in the world, this one does a little more; it combines every branch of knowledge. Review Brownian Motion. Einstein used it to represent that atoms exist but what about the life? (it was pollen)
Well I never! I guess you wouldn't mind pointing us in the direction of the relevant journal article then?
would have .......... guessed? It came from combining the forms of defining energy in a simple equation and my professor said 'if it doesn't do anything for mankind then it is worthless.' So a spitfire of a 16 year old took up biology drilling down to the molecular interactions. Focusing primarily on the synaptic juction. So in a physics form shared how neurons exchanged energy (signaling). At that was not appreciated by about 20 institutions. Nope i mentioned once before the answer i got and it is quite similar to what i saw here on this site the other day "You can't use light as an absolute reference frame, because it moves with the same speed in all reference frames. Doing so would imply that light has a rest frame, which is not true by postulate." ie.... means the learned are too far gone so when you can perform the energy upon mass as the specimen and recognize the 'intent' thereof... then perhaps you can ask for the next step. ie... the math already exists for that aspect (green, gibbs..etc) Point being there is a missing part and plain common sense of the 1st law of thermodynamics reveals the whole chain below the 2nd law has a missing 'causation'. (and planck is bound to the 2nd) SO no more philosophical concepts; NO ..... you either do your homework and convey truths grounds in logic over beliefs of theorem or i have no interest in discussing with the so called educated. (complacency is exactly like a belief in a theological interpretation as absolute; that is how rediculous it is to me) ie.. in my eyes be qualified or cut from the class Honesty is absolute! ie... answer "what is heat?" (what is that thang?)
