The Expansion Tectonics of Europa

Then where is the stream of Neutrinos from the earths core?
Why isn't the Earths core comparable in temperature and pressure to the interior of an O-type star (or have we got that wrong as well)?
Why is there no eidenc eof Iron being produced in the Sun's core?
Why is there no evidence for a significant change in Earths moment of inertia in the last 620 million years?

 

You are mistaken.
It's not a property that's unique to water.
Certainly it's a rare property, but not unique to water, and no, I don't have a comprehensive list at this time.

 

Neutrinos are a fusion by-product, and are produced in the production of Iron.

You bought up EMST.
You bought up the fact that EMST claims that Iron is produced in the core of the Earth.
I am responding to the subjects you have bought up in this thread. If you didn not want them discussed, you should not have bought them up.

Perfectly.
Oh, no doubt you will now trawl through the internet, and produce images of the sun taken at the Fe-IX wavelength, and cite the papers that talk about the levels of Iron in the sun, it's metallicity blah blah ad nauseum.

However, in doing so, you will inevitably miss the point that those papers are simply dicussing the presence of Iron in the sun, and say nothing about the production of Iron in the sun, while completely missing the point that the standard models of stellar nucleosynthesis and stellar evolution both say that the sun is too small to produce Iron by fusion.

I am only talking about the topics that you have bought into this thread (namely in this case EMST). If you can't prove that EMST is correct by demonstrating it's validity on the one planet we have access to a wealth of data on, then why should we assume that it magically applies to Europa?

A further point.

Earlier in the thread it was pointed out to you that Hydrocarbons had not been detected on Europa by spectroscopy, and you responded by pointing out that spectroscopy can only detect what's on the surface, or in the atmosphere.

However, in your haste, you neglected to realize that you're implying that only earth does Oil seep to the surface, and that only on earth is the mantle material incoporated into the crust (europa's mantle material isgenerally held to be liquid water, or an ice-water sludge).

Tell me something else, if Oil requires temperatures in excess of 1000 c, and pressures in excess of 15 MPa, then how does it form in a mantle composed of Liquid water, or water-ice slurry?

 

No doubt this will seem like a provocative statement to make, but it's also a true one.

The mere fact that you would explicitly state that you can be convinced 'beyond any reasonable doubt' that an idea, or a thoer 'is the truth' implies you're not doing science.

A true scientest should always have their mind open to the possibility that their theory might be wrong.

A true scientest understand that it's only by attmepting to prove their theories wrong, that they can gather evidence to support their theory.

 

While this is true, there has been no neutrino flux detected that has been (AFAIK) either provisionaly, or unambiguously identified as originating from the earths core.

Same place Solar Iron originated from - the primordial solar nebula.

If you want more information, go and look up stellar nucleosynthesis.

 

And yet you have simply buried your head in the sand and denied any evidence against your argument, period.