Can Gravitational Bodies Grow?

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by OilIsMastery, Sep 30, 2008.

Page 5 of 7
  1. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    So people in California are being subducted into the San Andreas fault?
     
    OilIsMastery, Oct 1, 2008
    #81

  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    back at it again i see?

    did i or did i not say that san andreas was a transform plate boundary.

    you're just being ridiculous, and setting up straw man arguments.
     
    Trippy, Oct 1, 2008
    #82

  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    There is dust on Mars too. Mars is a planet the last time I checked.

    Are you familiar with a Mars Exploration Rover by the name of Spirit?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    On the way to Columbia Hills Spirit's solar arrays were getting covered with...guess what? ...pause...wait for it...dust!!!

    Spirit's solar arrays were so covered in dust that it was about to die. But a dust devil came and cleaned off the arrays...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    AlphaNumeric is simply ignorant of the universe he lives in. It's obvious you are too.
     
    OilIsMastery, Oct 1, 2008
    #83

  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. pjdude1219

    pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
    and you missed the point.
     
    pjdude1219, Oct 1, 2008
    #84
  8. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    seeing as how you're obviously truggling with the basics.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Trippy, Oct 1, 2008
    #85
  9. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Divergent spreading is the only thing real that you show.

    Convergent so-called "plates" would not subduct they would form mountain ranges.

    "Subduction is not only illogical, it is not supported by geological or physical evidence, and violates fundamental laws of physics." -- Lawrence S. Myers, cryptologist/geoscientist, 2005
     
    OilIsMastery, Oct 1, 2008
    #86
  10. Vkothii

    Vkothii Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,674
    Is that why there are mountains?

    Or, let me guess, you have another theory about mountains being the result of positrons decaying in the mantle?

    Why would converging plates form mountains? Why wouldn't one plate slide under the other?
    Hang on, I think there's a name for that.
     
    Vkothii, Oct 1, 2008
    #87
  11. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    only if the pates are of equal density - for example the himilayas.

    Are you trying to contradict your own sources again?

    IE the USGS?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    here's a jpl map.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Trippy, Oct 1, 2008
    #88
  12. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    How did the Himalayas form, OIM? Did God make them? Or did they grow from pair production in the Earth's core?
     
    James R, Oct 1, 2008
    #89
  13. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    No. Mountains are caused by divergence because of oceanic seafloor spreading.

    Because subduction is physically impossible.

    Because basalt and granite cannot magically teleport themselves into the mantle and then magically recycle themselves.

    It's called mythology.
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2008
    OilIsMastery, Oct 1, 2008
    #90
  14. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    The lines indicated as converging and transforming cannot possibly be due to zircon dating.

    How old is that map? It must be 20th century..

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Allow me to share 21st century earth science with you:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2008
    OilIsMastery, Oct 1, 2008
    #91
  15. Vkothii

    Vkothii Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,674
    What's your personal mythological explanation for the existence of the Tibetan plateau?
    And there's a range of mountains that lie along a transform boundary (the pacific-australian plate boundary), you can climb these babies, ski on them, etc. They're known as "the Southern Alps", and they're absolute thousands of km from any mid-ocean ridge?? How did they get there??
    You haven't a clue, is that the answer?
    So is the possibility of someone who has their head stuck so far up their own ass as you, ever seeing the light of day.
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2008
    Vkothii, Oct 1, 2008
    #92
  16. pjdude1219

    pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
    I would still like to know if the earth is growing how is the laser nasa is shining off a mirror bout a yard square hasn't needed to be adjusted for the change in angle that it would cause? We aren't talking about a large margin for error here.
     
    pjdude1219, Oct 1, 2008
    #93
  17. Vkothii

    Vkothii Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,674
    That little problem isn't in OIM's mythology, so he won't be addressing it anytime soon.
     
    Vkothii, Oct 1, 2008
    #94
  18. pjdude1219

    pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
    True, I do find it amusing that me who doesn't have a very high level understanding of this topic is able to refute his arguement.
     
    pjdude1219, Oct 1, 2008
    #95
  19. OilIsMastery

    OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    No adjustments after earthquakes?

    http://expanding-earth.org/page_9.htm

     
    OilIsMastery, Oct 1, 2008
    #96
  20. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    OIM,

    Please don't keep reposting the same image. It has already been discussed.
     
    James R, Oct 1, 2008
    #97
  21. pjdude1219

    pjdude1219 The biscuit has risen Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    16,479
    pjdude1219, Oct 1, 2008
    #98
  22. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    What does Zircon dating have to do with measuring the direction the plates are moving in?

    Answer: Nothing. See the earlier image I posted detailing GPS motion data.

    As for the rest of your obnoxious conceited prattle.

    Given that according to the USGS virtual directory listing lists the map as having been placed online January 25th, 2008, using the most up to date information available from NOAA, The Smithosnian Institute, Worldsat international, and ESRI.

    Again, it's demonstrated that you've got nothing but hot air and dishonesty.
     
    Trippy, Oct 1, 2008
    #99
  23. Trippy

    Trippy ALEA IACTA EST Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,890
    Once again - all one needs to do is look at the GPS data i've posted earlier in this thread that clearly demonstrates that North and South America are, effectively rotating around the Caribean plate.

    Do you have anything that isn't based on smoke, mirrors, and deception?
     
    Trippy, Oct 1, 2008
    #100
Page 5 of 7

Share This Page