Why are christians so stupid?

Discussion in 'The Cesspool' started by Medicine*Woman, Sep 12, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CheskiChips Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,538
    You're equally 'stupid', you're just 'stupid' in a different way. Keep your retardation to yourself "Medicine Woman". If you have children, I sympathize for them. Living your life in this perpetual state of "evolution"...give me a break Mrs MW. Why do you believe lies you hear? The internet?

    Grow up..I don't care how old you are.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. OilIsMastery Banned Banned

    Messages:
    3,288
    Exactly. Although I would argue most atheists are borderline retarded if not clinically.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. wsionynw Master Queef Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,309
    No you wouldn't Oil, don't be silly.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848
    Yeah my christian girlfriend is so stupid that she is studying in Uni to become a doctor, she is already a qualified midwife and nurse. Im sure the fact she donates alot of money to poor and dedicates alot of her time to helping homeless children is stupidity aswell.

    What a retard, she should spend her free time putting down groups of people on Sciforums instead to boost her brain capacity.

    Get a life MW.


    peace.
     
  8. geeser Atheism:is non-prophet making Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,305
    Personally M*W, stupid is not technically correct, as a person of the religious persuasion, could be quite intelligent in every other aspect of their life, as Empty sarcastically stated in post #24.
    I think you should of used the word "Senseless:lacking mental perception, appreciation, or comprehension" Because when it comes to religion, thats exactly how they act.
     
  9. EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848
    I believe that Lao Tzu was a real person, there is no evidence to back up this claim atall. I don't think I am lacking mental perception believing in the techings and life of Lao Tzu.

    My girlfriend believes jesus did exist nd she follows the teachings that jesus left, which are in my opinion very decent morals and lessons. She believes God created the known universe and he/it is the source of all creation and has always existed. Personaly I do not find that in any way wrong, it gives her alot of positive drive and she is one of the happiest people I have ever met. She is very confident and Christianity is a huge reason as to why she has becme such a great and helpful person.

    I can't think of a single negative point to put her down with about her beliefs. I debate with her all the time about her religion, she does not blindly follow rules and has her own basis and reasoning as to why she should live her life the way she does. She is a much better person than I am and I have learned so much from her already.

    Her religion tells her not to be with me but she made her own choice to do so and did not blindly follow the rules. It is not true that all christians are blind sheep tha follow rules.

    Could anybody here give me a single reason as to why her faith is a bad thing?.


    peace.
     
  10. geeser Atheism:is non-prophet making Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,305
    Well bully for you, however you may not think your lacking, and thats fine, but others do.
    Would you think it odd if someone thought Micky Mouse was real, as there is no evidence for him existing either, or Quetzalcoatl the winged serpent?
    Nobody has said they aren't, but there is no evidence that a jesus person ever said them.
    And thats good, but it does not change the fact she believes in fantasies. Putting a big ? over her head.
    Well you only need to look at world history for an answer to that.
    But on a personal level, If you girlfriend truly believed via a vision that jesus wanted her to kill the woman next door, she would do it.
    It has happened so many times before, by good people.

    "Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."Steven Weinberg
     
  11. EmptyForceOfChi Banned Banned

    Messages:
    10,848
    I don't see how mickey mouse can be compared to Lao Tzu.


    I know there is no evidence, there is no evidence of god either, people have faith it makes them happy and gives them hope for when you die.

    How can you make that kind of judgement on a person you have never met or even spoke to?. No she would not do that she does not blindly follow rules and commands, even if god herself told her to kill out of cold blood she would refuse I know that 100% because we have alredy debated this.




    So that means everybody will do it just because other people have in the past?, thats like saying all muslims will turn into suicide bombers if they are told to do it.



    That statement cannot be applied to every religious person, Im pretty sure good people have done evil things and they were Atheists aswell not all religious. I was an Atheist and consider myself a decent person at heart, but I did some evil things.


    You cannot generalize with prejudice stereotypes and paint every person with the same brush just because they hold faith. Thats the same kind of mentality that makes religious people stereotype Atheists and say "all Atheists are this or that".

    Can you not understand that religious people can also make there own decisions as to what is right and wrong?, not all of them follow everything just because a book says so. You make huge assumptions about a person you have never even spoken too, that is not wise when making judgement calls. Don't you believe in having evidence before making a decision?, you seem to have a type of "faith" that people you don't know all would kill people for no reason just because a vision tells them too.


    Come on man that's an unfair accusation which is not true.


    peace.
     
  12. PsychoticEpisode It is very dry in here today Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,452
    Like high stakes poker, the Christians are 'all in' with a pair of deuces. The trouble is the other side is holding a pair of aces. It's a gamble and gambling is stupid. Unless you win of course, then you're a friggin' hero. Since the first person threw in his lot with Christ, not one Christian has ever witnessed the third deuce and now they're down to the River card. Trouble is, two other players that folded are holding a deuce also.

    Is it stupid to go against all odds & gamble your life away while doing it? Oh, I think so.
     
  13. John99 Banned Banned

    Messages:
    22,046
    What more can we ask for than honesty?

    Atheism is based on another persons percetion of something that they have no way of knowing and the chances of that view being accurate is no greater than fifty percent. Who is the Messiah? You can choose either Darwin or Dawkins.

    So the Atheist is just as much a follower as anyone else is. They did not come to their conclusions on their own no more than anyone else did.

    If anyone can tell me that Charles Darwin did not simply look at organisms and decide that since they had similarities (i sometimes think the fact they were alive was enough) then that was enough to deide theere is a common ancestor. But the reality is that it is not enough because there is no proof.

    It was all very primitive, given the time he was alive this is understandable. I know that extinction is a reality and when organisms reach limits of survivability they DO NOT ADAPT TO SURVIVE. THEY DISAPPEAR FOREVER. We do know that life is pervasive and is geared toward surviving and not walking off of a cliff but ahhhh. what is the point?
     
  14. PsychoticEpisode It is very dry in here today Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,452
    Bullshit!

    They couldn't indoctrinate me, plain and simple. Why? Because I waited for them to show me and they never delivered.
     
  15. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    So you lack faith. It happens. Get over it.
     
  16. PsychoticEpisode It is very dry in here today Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,452
    Oh SAMMY, I love it when you talk like that. Speaks volumes.
     
  17. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    I can't fathom why theists are supposed to validate a lack of faith in atheists.
     
  18. Cellar_Door Whose Worth's unknown Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,310
    Nice to hear you using the words 'lack of faith', S.A.M.
     
  19. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    Yeah, as compared to lack of belief, which is epistemiologically unsound.
     
  20. Cellar_Door Whose Worth's unknown Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,310
    Grammatically unsound perhaps - 'lack' should instead accompany 'faith', the synonym of belief.

    But going back to this thread, when on earth are Theists required to validate anything?
     
  21. S.A.M. uniquely dreadful Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    72,825
    You guys have pathetic grammar teachers. Faith != belief, belief is a consequence of faith. Look up fideism.

    I was referring not to any or all faith, but faith in God.
     
  22. Cellar_Door Whose Worth's unknown Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,310
    Can't say that I've ever heard of a grammar teacher

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    As was I.
     
  23. Crunchy Cat F-in' *meow* baby!!! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,423
    Incorrect. I became an atheist before I was even exposed to the word 'atheist'. Everyone I knew was a believer and I could see quite clearly that the life form they referred to as 'God' was non-existent.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page