You wish me...a pint of sand on the ocean floor to define the whole ocean? What more can I offer than suppostion?
No.. I was just telling you that your argument contradicted your earlier statement "there are no closed systems".
Thats because this so called bubble is not closed...it is not a bubble...it is shaped as a bubble in my view (because of expansion from singularity all throughout to form such shape). Is bubble a closed system?:bugeye:
:bugeye: A plant, for instance, did NOT always exist. Yet the purpose of the universe is for it to decompose, according to you. Why did the universe create the plant in the first place ? While living things are highly ordered (decreased entropy) they cause chaos in their immediate surroundings (increased entropy). The two cancel out.
Allright than I..."I draqon state the following that what I have stated is the most probable assumption of the nature of universe based on other most probable assumptions called laws"
life is a very delicate branch in understanding entropy...I am not sure myself why life exists itself, because such would mean that in following scenario the highly complex life with a definite unfavoring of entropy seems to be in place of existence...I simply cannot answer the question. A plant exists in time frame of existence of universe for that cycle of its existence. So in next cycle of universe creation that plant will most likely exist as well again.
look people...you rain me with questions I have no answers myself. As I stand, the answers I give are most probable assumptions with the highest probability of being a fact for cases you ask me for. Because everything is an assumption.
The probability of decomposition is 77.7% in the odds favoring all matter if it were to be out of the box
Allright than Enmos...you wish me to cite others because you do not believe me? Fine here is a site on string theory: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/ a site on discussion of open, closed, and flat universe: http://www.superstringtheory.com/cosmo/cosmo21.html the laws of entropy or laws of thermodynamics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics Discussion of multiverse theory: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse_(science) http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.4460 (if you got the subscription to this)
Enmos you want concrete answers, there are none. Thats why we got projects like CERN to give us "most probable" answers. Now read those sites I posted, please.
then how is conception, pregnancy and birth possible? wouldnt the forming of an organism be anti-entropic?