"Out of Africa" theory: a done deal

Randomly capitalized perhaps; but still sound advice.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Some would disagree...

We, as in racists?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

They're saying aborigines aren't actually homo erectus, I never said they were.
The fact they felt obliged to point that out only confirms what I said - that aborigines have more homo erectus-y characteristics than other human populations.
So much so some scientists can nearly confuse aborigine bones for homo erectus bones, it turns out.
Weird.
Thanks for the info.

Why would racists skirt around something to avoid hurting aborigines feelings?
I was thinking more along the lines of "pussies", "we" was just a figure of speach to make pussies feel less alone (they're a sensitive bunch), I don't skirt around it.

 

It's usually a racist that claims an ethnicity other than their own is less advanced.

 

Bells, none of that conflicts with anything I've said.

 

This is just getting more bizarre as the thread progresses.

According to the quote in Bells post that we all evolved equally and that inbreeding was involved then how in the hell do we all look different? No i dont mean slight difference like hair color but clear differences that are consistant.

for example:

shape of eyes
skin color
height

So basically we all evolved at exactly the same time from a common ancestor and were inbred.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Science Proves We Come From 1 Common Female African Ancestor.to Simply Deny Or Try To Discredit The Proof Is Rather Delusional.i Have Not Kept Up With This Thread,however I Imagined Someone Would Try To Discredit That All Humans Derive From A Common African,perhaps Some Caucasion With An Inferiority Complex?

 

This isn't suprising. Early humans suffered from 'prognathism', or the projection of a lower, larger jaw. A physical characteristic which is accompanied by a lower, receding forehead, smaller brain capacity and less developed chin. The Neanderthals suffered from this and to an extent so do the Aborigines and many sub-Saharan African populations.

Below is an image showing the gradual evolution, over millions of years, of the human skull in which the jaw has reduced in size and the upper cranium risen allowing brain expansion. I believe the first skull is that of a chimpanzee inserted for comparison.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Interestingly, most mammals have prognathism. Just look at lions, tigers, cats, dogs, etc...

 

I agree that it is usually perceived this way, but only by the perceiver. And of course by the one who is "less advanced". I for example love and adore dogs, but I can say with confidence that I am a more advanced being than a dog.

Not to back up claims that aborigines are less advanced. I just think that saying that people are different doesn't make one a racist. People are different. Not just among races, but even down to the nationality level. Take a tour of Europe and see how the Germans differ fro the dutch, or how Ukrainians differ from Spaniards. Or go to Asia and see how Koreans differ from Japanese, Vietnamese differ from Chinese... All these people differ slightly not just in appearance, but to attitudes, beliefs, skills and talents, culturally etc... None of them are "superior" and none of them are "inferior". they're just different. And all of them have many gifts to contribute to humanity as a whole.

I just fell that people are so eager to toss around the term racist and call someone a racist for whatever reason they can.

 

Superiority complexes resulting from feeling inferior to something.Thats how i see those who carry the I AM A BETTER HUMAN than he is mentality.

 

I never said I was better, just that I was different. Did you actually read my post? I agree that superiority complexes result from feelings of inferiority. But In re reading my own post, I really don't think that I came off as claiming superiority. I guess I was right when I said people are quick to call someone a racist. Maybe you're looking for whatever reason you can to be a racist, so you are quick to call someone a racist.

 

:bugeye:I never insinuated that you were said you were better.I was just simply responding lol

 

Nonsense. You said it wouuld be a lie, meaning you somehow know the "truth". That's not a scientific approach, it's a punditry laced with agenda, just liike thiis one:

Who do you think you are kidding?

 

Informative!

Didnt the Egyptians trace there ancestry to the land of punt? (Present day Ethiopia)

 

Your statements show you do not support, follow, or understand scientific inquiry, which is exactly the opposite what you claimed, and now you get all uppity with your mod privileges because you got owned when I show you your own statements demonstrating it. Guess you should be more careful in what you wish for in the future, eh?

And, I already gave you proof: the theory cannot explain humans existing ~50,000 years ago in australia when those humans do not share the mtDNA used as the focal point in the out of africa theory. The fossil record has always supported the multi-regional theory, not out of Africa model. The DNA data of out of africa model uses does not even confict with the mulltiregional theory, because we can't prove those DNA markers originated where the out of africa model assumes they did.