Imagine if you will, having 7 children. As bad as that thought would be, yes, 7 children is a virtual nightmare, imagine if all 7 were under the age of 2. That's right folks, 7 children under the age of 2. Makes me want to scream in terror and cry to be honest.:bawl: The only words that came to my mind after reading this was, holy crap! I mean honestly... What the hell!?! Her mother works cleaning houses and I would assume she gets some financial help from the State. Now her mother is asking for more help, aside from the house and land that was donated to her daughter when she had the first set of triplets. But Argentinians are now beginning to question whether something more should be done. Primarily, educating the girl on matters concerning contraception. I can't say that I blame them. Imagine.. 7 children under the age of 2. Tis the stuff of nightmares, people. NIGHTMARES!
At least she will have her parents her grandparents and great grand parents to help her with their upbringing. Now we understand why there's 7 billion people in the world today, no one uses condoms and birth control pills that really ought to. Thanks to the religions of South America that don't think that birth control is helpful because that religion only wants more members to give them money. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
I'm trying to figure out how she found the time to have sex after the first set of triplets were born. You'd think the use of a condom would have been advised to her after she had the first set, wouldn't you? The pill maybe? Hell, anything? I am still trying to wrap my brain around the thought of having 7 children, all under the age of 2. *Shudders*
god thats alot. The statistics for multiple births DO say that once you give birth to one set you are more likly to give birth to another (excepting identical twins i belive) I know mum did say that if she had had anymore kids the odds were almost certin she would have had ATLEAST 2 more Still about the contraception you cant teach some people. As i said in another thread my partner and I have this friend who REFUSES to use condoms (or the pill, though in her case having differnt partners all the time she should be using condoms). Its sad but no matter how many times we have sat her down to explain the "facts of life" (and the STD's that come with them, with colour pitures mind you) she still wont get it
Did any of you see that movie Idocracy? (yes i know thats spelled wrong, i think its surposed to be though) About how we are breeding out inteligence?
my question is, if she had 4 children by the age of 15, why the fuck didn't the docs tie her tubes then it was her second pregnancy, she was obviously not smart enough to keep herself from getting knocked up again and now they want money jeez
What if she wanted kids ten years down the road? What if some of her kids died at a young age? "Tying her tubes" is not a reasonable solution.
Its also illegal in most countries At least in Australia the law its very clear: (im sorry i dont have the case on hard right now, i will try to update this post with the case and exact rulling latter) It went along the lines that "unlike other medical prociders, any procidure that inpinges on sexual health can not be authorised by a parent or guardian on someone who is incompitant based because of mental incapacity or age. Only for medical reasons and through the guardianship board may such a procidure be carried out" As you can see that is not a direct quote so dont bother googling it Actually im surprised this has never been aplied to male genital mutilation (interesting side note sorry)
so she has 7 kids under the age of 2!? I think I'd be suicidal. Ya know, she's a child, she's allowed to be stupid. Where the hell are her parents? Where are the men that got her pregnant?
