Divorce Because Of

pffft anal sex? LOL, no that wasn't it. I would have thought that was painful not vile.

But if it had been, how many of you have asked if a person likes taking it up the ass before you ever have sex with them? I know that conversation never came up for me. Or how about "Are you into necrophilia?" "Are you a pedophile?"

People may talk about kinky stuff, they don't talk about illegal perversions.

And why am I getting lambasted for my innocence? I find it very telling. No "Sorry I jumped to conclusions. Sorry I judged you before knowing the whole story" But "Its your fault I was mean to you"

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

and some people can deal with medical conditions, some can't. Two years ago one of my daughters friends' Mom had an accident and will now spend the rest of her life in a wheelchair. Her husband divorced her.

Should he have stayed with her? Do you really want someone to stay with you out of pity and guilt?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

he divorced her because HE couldn't handle her condition, after so many years of marrage, he just threw that away.

was he happy before the accident?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

yes, they just got back from a vacation in Costa Rica. They were a very active couple, which is how she got hurt. So I guess more than their sex life was affected.
Still, I would rather have his shallow ass gone than staying out of duty.

 

yeah i wouldn't want anyones love because of pity, but i don't understand why he left her, he mustve really loved her beofre the accident, did that love just disapeer over night?

 

a year.

 

well i guess he stuck around long enough to find out how he felt,

 

I PM'd ya

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Him leaving was a good thing then. It sucks looking back and realizing how much time and effort you wasted.

But seriously, he had the nerve to sue her? Hmmm, I hope he went on and found a woman who made him miserable.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Mod Hat - Temporary closure

Mod Hat — Notes on a disaster (Temporary closure)

This topic is re-opened.

Members are specifically advised to remain relatively close to the topic of discussion (see topic post if you need a reminder). While a certain amount of digression is understandable and has always been permitted, this topic suffered two major digressions. One of them I do not particularly mind, except that it became a significant issue of its own, and thus has been given its own splinter topic, which has been sent to the Religion forum. The other digression involves member dissatisfaction with moderators, fellow posters, and the discussion in general; it, too, has been moved to a splinter topic. Both of these topics will soon be available for further discussion.

Members are also advised of the following:

• Complaints about moderators/moderation: If you are unhappy with a moderator's decision regarding posts in a topic, do not post those complaints within the moderated topic. Instead, inquiries should be directed via private message to the moderator in question, or up the chain of authority—e.g., a supermod or admin.

• Moderators are participants, too: Members upset about moderators should consider certain factors regarding what role that moderator is playing. In this topic, members complained about moderators while overlooking two vital criteria.

(1) Bells was participating in a topic outside her jurisdiction. Had she chosen to flex her authority as a moderator, she would state that explicitly.

(2) With me, there is a clear difference between whether I am participating in a discussion or exercising my authority. For those who have yet to figure out the difference, actions I take as a moderator are distinguished by certain signals: colored type (dark green), alternate font (arial), and, generally, a declaration that I am acting as a moderator (e.g., "Mod Hat", "Mod Note", "Mod Edit").​

Members should remain aware of such issues before focusing their complaints inappropriately on moderation. As certain portions remaining in this discussion testify, you are welcome to argue with us as discussion participants when we are conducting ourselves as such. However, if you become upset with our opinions or statements as participants, do not complain about our actions as moderators.​

Additionally, as a general consideration, it would serve some well to bear in mind that moderators are generally aware of what takes place outside their jurisdiction. While we may not be thoroughly versed in the details, we are aware of rivalries and other general trends. In other words, you do not get a blank slate with each new discussion or new post.

Lastly, I would urge people to consider that we as moderators are not about to search through the whole of the Sciforums archive for you when you are attempting to present us details for consideration. In other words, instead of saying, "He said ... and then she said ... and then a moderator told me ... so why isn't ...?" what you need to do is take a breath, gather a few links, and show us what you're talking about. And even then we sometimes won't see the same things you see. But at least then we will have better context regarding whatever it is you're trying to tell us.

Thank you.

• • •​

Splinter Topics:

• Divorce in Islam and Other Cultural Issues
• Shorty's tantrum and related posts​

• • •​

This topic is temporarily closed for necessary cleaning. It will be reopened soon.

 

is watching porn and picking up some pointers out of the question? (due to moral reasons)
Also, don't guys talk about this? Women do and we share pointers.

 

If who can feel it? The guy?

 

LOL, its not in my nature to guess and assume.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Considering he's asking if the woman can ask for a divorce, wouldn't it be important that the woman feel it?

 

yes, he is a man.
you assumed huh?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1761368&postcount=1