sam's trollish nature

I banned you after a warning and after you reposted the deleted post. So essentially I posted your flames in the Warning sticky, as well as in the Temporary Ban sticky.

Hardly a secret. Every mod knows what every other mod does.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Sam,

As you've shown, you can basically connect everything and anything to anything else. You can find a way to insert the Evil USA into every conversation under the sun. But, can't you also refrain? Especially when it is obviously derailing the thread from the original topic and when the thread starter is unhappy with his thread being derailed?

There are plenty of Evil USA threads out there. You don't need to make every thread one.

Give Roman a break.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

At least they have the ability to do so. I don't think I read your post about banning Mountainhare.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Just checked. You didn't post a link to his post. You just said you banned him for reposting deleted material.

I agree that that is sufficient reason for banning in itself. After a warning, of course. No matter what the content of the reposted material.

 

Thank you for being so reasonable, invert.

 

i agree
this is the kind of moderation we need in sci
transparency and individualism

well done, vert

/proud

 

S.A.M:

1. Your warning was bullshit, because I didn't break any rules. What I posted wasn't flame. If what I posted was flame, then the misandry Fraggle posted was far more than flame, because he was actually serious.

2. I never reposted the post that you warned me for. You only quoted my FIRST post in the warning, not the second.

So the assertion that "Men can have an opinion on abortion when one of the bastards gets pregnant" isn't flame.

But when I respond with the satrical statement "Women can have an opinion on the management of the family finances when one of the bitches gets a job", that's flame? Clearly the statement is tongue in cheek, and merely meant to demonstrate why Fraggle's assertion regarding men and abortion is misandry.

The fact that you, and the admins (if what you say is true, that being they supported my ban over something so fucking absurd) lack the humour and intellect to appreciate such satirical subtleties, really indicates what a bunch of fuckers you are. And I even asked several people for their opinion, and they (including one girl!) found my analogy humourous and apt.

I'm not retarded. I know that the vast majority of the mod squad have it in for me, and they will look for any excuse. That's your method of operation. Pathetic! Why don't you punish the bad behaviour of your fellow mods, before getting medieval on my ass?

 

that said, it is fun to see a girl make these macho fucks her bitches
that is....... minus the insidious moderation

 

I'll tell Roman what I tell everyone who complains.

Report the post. If the moderator feels its not appropriate to the thread, they can delete it. You'll never see me complain about deleted posts (James did it once, I believe, and I merely grumbled a bit).

 

Report the post to James R? Hah, what a joke.

 

Oh, brother...

eh.

Whatever, then.

 

His posts are in the warning thread.

And, as I have already told Plazma, I am going to direct all complaints about moderation to him.

I'm done explaining myself where moderation is considered.

 

witness my attempt. vert characterizes as a complaint

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=75515

a spoof on the mod teams efforts to make thsi a more scientific site
the thread is titled "intellectual dishonesty"

i mean, how mean spirited could one get to actually mean that shit
"bah, humbug" taken to extreme heights

a goddamn satirical spoof
way over dumbfucksci's head

 

Gustav:

Some people never learn
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=22556

 

Tut tut, you were 'overriding moderation'. Good golly, what nerve. How dare you engage in 'civil disobedience'. Why don't you go back to Africa, Rosa Parks?

 

ja
doomed to repeat.......

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Yeah sorta makes one rethink the whole intellectual dishonesty bit when one plays dumb over and over, while repeating the same modus operandi?

/ooh officer did I cross the red light? Again?
/bats eyelashes furiously

 

learn what, sam?
do share

 

/bats eyelashes even more furiously
/pouts lips

 

explain. something was asked of me and i played dumb. actual ignorance was never an option.

explain the issue and context, why are you so sure? is deception my m.o on this board.