Why do racists have low IQs?

Studies have shown that racists have lower IQs from the mean.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

http://www.clubs.psu.edu/up/sayar/riqs.htm

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

and?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Where are the 'error bars', S.A.M?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

How is that relevant to the discussion? How does racism have anything to do with this discussion? Or did I just answer my own question?

 

Thats a standard distribution curve, it does not show error bars

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

francois:

It has nothing to do with the discussion! It's just S.A.M trying to derail the thread, again.

And here's the definition of injustice: Not being able to place S.A.M on ignore. I'd rather nude human pyramids than listening to her tripe!

 

Why do you think racists have lower IQs? Do people with lower IQs gravitate towards racism? Is it a means of self defence?

 

You didn't answer my question. What does racism have to do with this discussion? Stop ruining this place.

 

I'm interested in the contribution of IQ to racism. The discussion is on IQ and race, and since there is a correlation between low IQ and racism, I would like to examine the relationship scientifically.

 

S.A.M:

Doesn't random error effect data which is normally distributed?

Too bad the topic of this thread isn't about such a 'correlation'. Start another thread if you want to troll.

 

Does it? What does it mean in terms of the above data?

 

Then why don't you start a new thread? Isn't that how it's supposed to work? You see... how IQ relates to racism is a different topic from the one in this thread. Your IQ of 140 can comprehend that, can't it?

I've done it before... participated in threads... and then it gets into something else that's interesting that I want to talk about... and then I make a new thread somewhere else. I don't derail a thread.

You want to talk about the IQs of babies and how racism relates to IQ. This ain't the thread. But you're a mod, so you can do anything you want.

 

S.A.M:

Sampled data that conforms to a normal distribution doesn't suffer from random error?

You know the answer to that question, S.A.M. Why have you neglected to post any measures of random error for the distributions you posted? Oh wait, don't answer. I know that answer to THAT question.

 

Feel free to fill in the gaps.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

well dam im bloody smart then

 

can i have me degree now .......or
just a humorous joke

 

probably in the documentation it there so if you have a question like yours you can go look it up

 

A Grudge string, stemming from things not going the way they want in another.

Why does believing that different races have different IQs make you a racist?

One should treat all people equally.. and any person of any race can have a 180 IQ.. though the probabilites for it may be different.

After all if one can test/Accepts a mere '4' point differential for [subjective term] 'racists', one should accept the much more significant 15 point difference between Asian/115 and white/100 and black/85. (app)

 

I think the girl's gone crazy. All she can think about is IQ and penises.

 

Here is the answer.

The Racial Question: Liberals vs Archie Bunker

Liberals and other 'sophisticated' folk have long regarded those who promote white racial consciousness as ignorant and prejudiced -- 'not smart enuf to think their way out of a paper bag', as one wit put it. Instead, liberals have supposed that such people have been brought up in a parochial Southern backwater which nurtures a milieu of hatred that keeps them from seeing that blacks, Jews and other 'outsiders' are merely their brothers under the skin, and that 'there is only one race, the human race'. In truth, however, the liberals have gotten things exactly backward. The ugly reality is that, unlike the generally-well-off liberals, the 'hicks, 'rednecks', 'Archie Bunkers' and other white members of the lower economic class do not have the financial wherewithal to move from the urban ghetto to the tree-lined glades and gated communities of the 'good' neighborhoods once their own area begins to darken. The result is that those whom liberals call ignorant and prejudiced are merely those who have received instruction in racial differences by living cheek-to-jowl with the darker denizens of the multicultural nightmare; and when such people obtain a PhD in the College of Hard Racial Knocks, as they invariably do, they are unlikely to embrace a coat-and-tie approach to the problems that were once regularly handled with a rope and ladder. What is even more important, however, is that while the rest of us may congratulate ourselves on how 'unprejudiced' we are and how uncompromisingly we reject 'hate', the approach to the Racial Question by the unsophisticated lower-class white -- crude as it may be -- is far better grounded in fact and reason than the liberal foolishness to which we have been subjected for the last half century. The Archie Bunkers of our world may be an easy target for Hollywood comedy and the documentaries of Morris Dees & Co, but such 'ignorant and prejudiced' whites at least know what liberals will continue to deny until they are forced 'up against the wall, mother fucker', namely, the difference between Black and White. --JBR Yant