Please refer to the opening post of the thread, which usually contains the question under discussion.
Perhaps it is the result of a different demographic mixture, but there are parallels in Indian and US society for these factors, which show different patterns. It is interesting to explore patterns, at least to me. I see I shall have to include "melanin-sensitive" as an additional category. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Au contraire, I am always very clear about what I am thinking; I do tend to miss steps in transmitting my thoughts though.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
At first I did'nt, but because so many people like yourself were personaly attacking me over what this man wrote, so I edited the post and posted the picture to show who did write the article. Is that why you spammed the thread? Did you learn a little something about yourself from this?
I think I understand what this is about now. Let me put it in plain words. On a completely different thread, which nine tenths of the readers of this one won't have read, Willy posted the opinion of a Black man on Hip-Hop. This man said that the ideas in Hip-hop were accepted as "street-cred", and that the lyrics were causing crime among people influenced by them. The music was also reinforcing stereotypes among white people about Black people that they have fought for generations to show as false. In this thread, Sam has posted a question that refers to Willy's thread, or others like it, but without any reference to it/him/them, and then wonders why no-one can make head or tail of what she is talking about. Her point is "Why do white people who believe blacks to be less intelligent than themselves use arguments put forward by black people to bolster their arguments" Is this right, Sam?
Thats not an answer. Why would posting the photo make any difference to the way the article was viewed?
The racists took a lesson from the Intelligent Design movement, you might call it Intelligent Racism, although it is just as stupid. In IR, they disguise their racist agenda in scientific objectivity.
Like I already said, then people would see I did not write the article and stop personaly attacking me becaue they believed I wrote it. So, now why did you personaly attack and spam that thread?
If you cannot make head nor tail of the question, then you are not a person of interest in this thread. As you will see by the arguments that D'ster/J.B.?/Big D?/Willy will present, he is very familiar with this sort of question.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Why not post a link to the original site? Why not write a reference? Why post a picture? Do you post pictures of all authors whose articles you quote?
