Well some, like Sam, generally do those worthless 1 liners (iceage was the king of that), and so acquire a large post count in comparison to those that actually write something worth reading.
Hi James R and fellow members, I might be added to this list: Join Date: 01-03-06 PostsTotal Posts: 2,506 (4.55 posts per day) existabrent
Murahah! I miss konversation with you killjoy, I wouldn't mind being on the list afterall, that IS why I posted!!!!
My ppd is 1.74 ... one of the least active members. ... In addition, I have noticed that the top three posters are all pretty new to Sciforums.
It's hard to maintain a huge post rate for a long time - years. The top posting rates are almost invariably from people who have only been here for a few months, max.
I think you better redo you list there........considering Orleander has 52.00 posts a day.... Sam Sandy and myself don't even come close! ranging from 32-39 posts
James, I've been here for less than six months. I have a 7.80 ppd count and I'm not on the list. Not that I'm screaming to be on it per se, but I just wanted to respond to your post concerning members who have been on here for a few months. I'm still confused on how you made this list.
interesting thats whats you said when you joined......almost 3 weeks ago........and you post all day and night.
Isn't that sweet. You noticed Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! I guess I was wrong. He's on vacation for 2 weeks, 2 days. You know how us stupid people are...can't do math either.
I looked at the people who were on the forum when I made this thread, and I looked at some other names that had come up regularly in the previous 24 hours. I said in the first post that the list was not comprehensive and did not include everyone. That would have required individually checking hundreds of profiles, one by one. The list I posted is not supposed to include everyone. It was never supposed to be definitive. Make your own list if you think you can do a better job, and you want to spend the time to do it.