Swivel: Oliver the chimp has been disproven to be a humanzee. Jimmie: THOU SHALT NOT COMMITETH THREAD NECROMANCY. Seriously. This is a -5 year old thread-. It is very rude. Don't do it again. For real.
Rumour has it that human-Gorrila hybrid has been tried without success. We do not have two different kind of intelligent/speech based humanoid specis. That does not mean, there would not be a separations of the human specis in the future. Idiots and Smarts that can not have babies together....Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
why would the neanderthal use the same tool (a piece of rock) for thousands and thousands of years and never evolve the tool or enhance it in any way, humans can adapt there equipment and we have the ability to alter and adapt our tools to meet different needs over the past millenia, neanderthals used a piece of rock to do everything it was there only tool, i would say we were smarter than them, and we ate them all so we win, Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! peace.
Ignore the Prince, jimmie. He's always had a right old bee in his bonnet about this. Most peculiar. Where is he anyway? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Plenty of white nationalists on Youtube Howling wolf, please join youtube. Many whitenationalists(which I am NOT) would love to debate with you. Currently I am debating this clown on the white Egypt vid. He seems to think that the oringial egyptians were white and argues larger brain sizes for white makes them better thinkers than blacks. Please debate him.
So, exactly what happened to Egyptians? They soaked all the sunshine and turned black? Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! My friend works for a company that does business in Africa. He said that Blacks in Southern Africa are more stupid than blacks in Northern Africa. As a matter of fact he said that English speaking blacks in Cameroon are smarter than their French speaking southerners. Which goes to show you that one can not generalize on this issue.
I have heard the same pattern claimed for whites in Canada and the US. Always by English speaking, northern whites. Random factoid: moderate, non-disease level iodine deficiency in childhood can cause a 15 point deficit in adult IQ.
Flowers of the same species can be white, pink, red.... so can humans... Well, not THOSE colors... Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Funny, you bring up US and Canada. Many years ago, I used to teach "Creativity" classes as a hobby in schools and colleges. A company in Canada approached me to do the same to Canadian executives as they seem to get stressed and get into drugs due to US competitive environment. Darn...I think I lost 15 points in IQ as I grew up with non-iodized salt. Otherwise I would be pushing 210+ Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
The Egyptian civilization was destroyed by Muslim Arab invaders. Today's "Egyptians" are of Arabic ancestry with a smattering of Egyptian blood. Regardless, skin color is one of the most ephemeral human characteristics. It's ironic that it's the one on which so many of us place so much importance. A population that moves far to the north or south adapts to the sunlight and develops a lower or higher melanin level within less than 2,000 years. Compare the people of Bangla Desh with their rather close cousins, the Ukrainians. I don't understand that statement. "Species" is a fairly standardized scientific category based on DNA and mating behavior. Those are real too. Within the past three or four years they completed the mapping of the dog genome. Send in a sample of your dog's DNA and they can tell you which breeds are in his ancestry if he's not a complete mongrel. The surprise was finding that dogs and wolves are a single species. The average mongrel dog's DNA is closer to a wolf than a greyhound is to a Pekinese. In a sense, the wolf is merely the original "breed" of dog.
It's NOT skin colour that's being debated. It's race. The differences between whites and blacks are not just skin deep. They extend to bone structure, tissue content and cerebral structure. These all manifest themselves in physical appearance and behavior.
When people talk about race, the dominant characteristic is often skin color. See below for a typical example from this very thread.
Just 50 years ago the Germans, Polish, French, Italians, Greeks, Norse, Russians, French, Spanish, English were all considered different "races".
Some European racists still think that way. But in America there's been so much intermarriage that the white nationalist recruiters have to move their goalposts. The "wogs" of yesterday (Italians, Greeks, Irish) can still be taught to hate blacks, and it boosts their numbers. With the rate of Mexican intermarriage, they'll probably accept Latinos as white in a few decades too.
When I lived in L.A. ten years ago, the rednecks looked around at all the Asian faces and started saying, "Ya know, them Messicans really are kinda white."
Heh! And if there are lots of blacks, they'll start looking at the Asians the same way. The South African Apartheid government treated Japanese as "honorary whites". Even racists understand that you need numbers to be properly supremacist. One wonders why they seldom make the next logical step in realising that the divide is arbitrary and . . . unnecessary.