A Strange Ring Galaxy

Chroot, is there a particular reason why you are playing a fool?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You've been big on personal attacks at me recently, which makes me feel... all warm and fuzzy, John.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

I must have a serious effect on you for you to dislike me so much.

Why don't you elaborate on my foolishness? I'm bored at work, and would love a laugh.

- Warren

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You are quite wrong, chroot. I don't make gratuitous attack posts. Attack posts do not advance discussion and are therefore a waste of time and effort. I, on the other hand, have been the recipient of attack posts from several individuals for merely stating my opinions, in this and other threads, which happened to be divergent from the attacker's view point. In some such cases I have, regrettably, responded with childish defensive attack posts.

Perhaps we should all refrain from attack posts and thus elevate our dialogue to a more mature level.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

...etc., etc.

- Warren

 

When the Great Wall photograph and the color revised photograph of Stick Man are examined, the matter placement in each can be determined to be slightly different from the other but the basic gravitational structure of both is determined to be the same. Each photograph shows us a representative cross section of the gravity juncture. For them to appear to us as identical gravity structures, Rav had to flip the photograph of Stick man. Our view of both phenomena is relative to our position, the same as when we see a spiral galaxy that looks as if it has a clockwise spin. If we were on the opposite side of space from the same galaxy and viewing it, it would appear to have a counter-clockwise spin. Since the plots of the Great Wall and the Stick Man are known, then we can begin to fill in the Unified Field conceptual map by plotting such hubs, which, since they are now known to be identical type of phenomena, will have to be given a like classification since it is likely we will eventually find may more of them.

 

No, John, the plots were of the same data, just with the galactic longitude axis flipped.

- Warren

 

When the current maps of matter distribution in the known universe are studied for even a short length of time, it is easy to discern the placement of mass densities from the areas of relative non-dense mass concentration, such as this map shows us;

http://astro.uni-tuebingen.de/~wilms/teach/cosmo/cosmo277.html

This apparent order of large structures in the universe cannot be in existence if the "Big Bang!" theory is true, since no such order could accrue if all mass concentrations in the universe were expanding away from all other mass concentrations in the universe. The wishy-washy "Big Bang!" theory, which doesn't ever try to explain even the fundamentals, such as how mass could even concentrate into galaxies if it was all exploding away from everything else, is clearly a junk theory. Since the above mapped gravitationally ordered mass concentrations of matter in the known universe ally closely with Einstein's Unified Field Theory, we should be willing to recognize the theory which more closely reflects reality and discard the one which is not representative of any reality.

 

False.

It may be. What's your theory?

So explain to us how Einstein had it all right. Use an equation.

- Warren

 

Wow how strange. Especially the second ring galaxy in the distance.

 

Maybe this is is a bell shaped system with a black hole existing directly beyond the core, creating a view of this muti-galaxy as if a flashlight were pinted directly at us......??

 

Hello all

has anyone thought that this may be an effect of gravitational lensing?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

its an binging black hole in the center


the shining thing in the center is supposed to be a big black hole that has punched hole in the galaxy and the center is shining due to all the cores stars having came together near the center revolving around back hole, creating an illusion of a bright star

 

I seriously doubt if that elongate galaxy in the background can actually exist in that elongated form. So its obvious that the more the circular object the less chances are that its an lens effect show. Now why will a lens effect be seen in the background is a bigger mystery, may be the smaller galaxy is seen actually in the foreground, somehow an compressed lensing image of the circular one.

 

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2004/15/image/a

relevant link

 

So this structure is probably the result of a collision between two galaxies? Amazing.

 

there's nothing strange about that. it's just a big solar system.

 

http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1306885#post1306885