Bells It looks like morons avoid answering questions and then disregard your own answers to their questions. Cow, here it is again: Nigga! Next question. Imbecile, masking as an intellectual because she was given authority, nurture is not the only thing that produces an “individual”. An “individual”, stupid, is the sum of his past. That includes experiences and genetic predispositions and talents and limits and potential. An individual dog has its own character but it still represents its species and its particular breed in demeanor and intellect and physical attributes. Fucked up biatch!!!!Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Now perhaps you can try to answer my questions and not avoid them like the imbeciles you moderate and who are long gone now. I suspect they still visit.
Satyr. What would you say if someone were to read your post and simply say: "Speak for yourself. My experiences with man have been different. The men I know aren't the self-hating, impotent, cradle cases that you describe. Maybe you should venture out more often, and stop casting your own shortcomings on those you don't seek to know?" I'm just curious if you would have another original:bugeye: response to that sort of witty rejoinder. After all, you do seem to be quite enamored with your own stylings, regardless of how repetitive they might be.
Regurgitating rodent. How would you know where I’ve been and what I’ve done? Also, would you think a retard, like you, or a child would understand himself and the world more than an adult, let’s say? If two people have the same experience do they both experience it the same and what makes the difference? But me and my personality or style or experiences are not the topic here, even though imbeciles, like you, would like to turn it into that. Imbecile. Existence is that which possesses a temporal character and so exhibits a potential, a possibility (space). Appearance, moron, is this temporality manifest and apprehended by an other. Everything from the appearances smell to its density to its color reveals itself to the other, through abstraction or aesthetics. A presence is the totality of everything that participated in its creation and how each subsequent appearance reacted to it. A man has intelligence because his ancestors, imbecile, faces challenges and environments that forced him to react and he possessed the tools to cope. A man might have blond hair because in the came environment he was also forced to adapt physically. To assume that environment affects the physicality and not the mind or that evolution is only cosmetic is to be a retard…like….YOU. A man’s appearance is no different since mind and body are not two different things but the same thing within a different context.
LOL! You are a true piece of work. I wont let you off that easy W. Despite your non-sensical rantings and attempts to move the point off center, I will continue to press the obvious. Do you really believe that the typical man is that far off-center? Or is it simply grist for the mill? I would actually be impressed if you could provide any sort of empirical evidence to back up the bullshit you shovel. Seriously. This might shock you, but I don't necessarily disagree with some of the crap you sling, but I like true scientific evidence, as opposed to one assholes rantings, as evidence of a hypothesis. Have you even considered that it might help your cause as a failed writer to actually be able to back up your arguments with at least some shred of scientific data? BTW, has she replied yet? I know it's killing you. That bitch! Here is all I have left of her [Deleted image] *Mod Edit* Please be advised that posting the photo of other members without their consent as some form of cheap shot is not appreciated or allowed.
I believed I answered your question. So if you don't like it, tough luck. I disagree with your hypothesis. You are attempting to generalise groups by colour. One's colour and all that has resulted in his being that colour in his genetic past says nothing about his personality, his tastes, his thoughts or his intelligence today as you see him. You might think it does because that is how you wish to compartmentalise individuals, and that's all very well and good for you. But not everyone agrees. If I were to use your form of 'compartmentalisation', I would be saying that since you are Greek, you are also a man who likes to partake in homosexual rituals like so many of your ancestors did. Would I be correct in this? Or would I have simply been stupid for making a generalisation based solely on what I know of your heritage while ignoring the individual that you are today? ------------------------------------------ Now in regards to your behaviour in this thread. I have asked you politely to stop being such an insulting little child but it appears that you cannot. It is obvious that you are simply unable to conduct any form of discussion without insults that frankly belong in the playground of second grade children. If you cannot accept that people disagree with you, then it is apparent that a forum is really the last place you should be pontificating in.
Compartmentalization can happen in many instances. Like the LDS Church (Mormonism), it feeds off of human guilt as though guilt were a genuine part of the universe, like stock market numbers, the universe doesn't give a SHIT about guilt. (and ALL other human concepts) But at the same time, the LDS Church teaches that everyone shall make it to Gods kindom, only that Mormomism will get you there faster.... this church preys on human instinct... but alas....
My childishness can only be cured by a healthy dose of stupidity or permanent banishment. I want to put it on my resume that I got banned from one of the most prestigious online think-tanks in the world. Any site where lightgigantic and Iceagecivilizations participate in has got to be one of a kind.
