This guy's a loser. What kind of genius is a bouncer? It's depressing proof that environment does mean something.
If you listened to what the guy said, he said he does not judge people just on IQ. He specifically said he personally judges intelligence by your production capacity. By what you can produce. I think there are a lot of people in the world who would not even be capable of understanding what this guy is talking about, but they understand Survivor or American Idol. The fact that we can even debate what he is saying and have these sorts of discussions, shows we can function at his level. Does that mean we have IQ's as high as his? I doubt it. I think his brain is a better calculator, but I don't think he is more imaginative than I am. IQ test itself does not test for creativity or ingenuity. I'm sure he is very intelligent in his own way, but I'm also sure there are people who have far more creative and original ideas who might have lower scores. If you don't agree with his ideas, show us your ideas. I've posted my ideas on this before. People in general did not agree with the ideas I posted for whatever reasons. Now we have high IQ guys posting their solutions, the whole point is, the smart people are capable of seeing what the problems are and are searching for solutions. Everyone else either does not care, or does not see that problems exist. So if you disagree with his ideas, do you have some better ones?
About what? Controlling populations? I just gave you my ideas on this. I happen to think they are better than his ideas. Let's debate them.
I hear this guy's sympathetic to Intelligent Design, proposing some sort of "synthesis" between its half and Darwin.
I think his disgenics project is feasible despite the comparisons to Nazi genocide. The guy is a fuckin genius. Right there we should entrust him with important decisions about people.
What do we know about this guys intellectual background and learning? This a perfect example of how a little knowledge can be dangerous..
I agree. I have a high IQ and belong to a few high IQ societies, but this forum beats all of them by miles in quality. I have found that high IQ societies end up being nothing more than a bunch of bullies that require you to become very offensive and defensive, otherwise they try to run over you. My IQ is right on the border of the 98/99 percentile and that is more than satisfying for me. I would not want an IQ on the extreme upper end. A great number of people in the 160+ range seem to suffer severe social difficulties.
Do you find that these bullies tend to be female or are these bullies equally divided between the genders?
It does tend to be more female than male. Many of the females "run in cliques" and if it isn't their way, then it's always wrong. I actually found them to be very entertaining and easily manipulated due to lack of emotional control.
Easily manipulated indeed. Just be glad that you are not married to one of them. Tell me, my good man, hast thou researched their behavioral idiosyncrasies viv a vis to where the offenders might be in their menstrual cycles?
This is all the most moronic crap I've ever heard and a sure route to extinction. The West is already suffering from low fertility, we need more kids, not less. If you're not from the US, go ahead and implement this in your own country. Then, in a few generations, we'll come and take over the empty space that was once your nation. It would be like a neutron bomb!
IQ alone does not make you a genius. It was ment to show that you could peace together information (or think with data) on your own once you had that information. You can have a high IQ and still be stupid. But if you got your hands read info, you could realy shine. I bet he is still stumped with realy basic concepts, like what is a "joke" or "a sense of humor" and what is the phenomenon of laughter (there are 3 different forms), two things that only 0.06% of all people can answer correctly.
I wondered many times if their cycle ever ended....Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!