AIDS denial is immoral

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Telling me not to have sex is also disrespectful to my personal freedoms. So is using totally bogus science to excuse that.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

"Blow me"

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

A person who makes these "requests" to me or any other human should at best be treated as a probably disreputable type of salesperson. More likely, he or she should be treated as a carpetbagger and run out of town on a rail, tarred, feathered, and filled with disgusting substances the nature of which I would rather not discuss.

The paradigm that you so vigorously defend, in the absence of firm evidence that it even exists in reality, is so disgusting and abhorrent that humanity should take firm measures to excise it from their midst. Your kind has had about 25 years to show more than babble and verbal abuse to support your claims, and you have totally failed to do this. The fact that you have talked to me the way that you have proves that in 25 years AIDS supporters have only become worse and have not found a way to make a good scientific case.

Some AIDS supporters even lie about the use of force and claim that it is a lie when people report that the police were used to enforce a doctor's orders to stop breastfeeding and to feed their children the poison, AZT.

What part of "I've had it with your nonsense" do you fail to understand?

 

Qwerty, they've been telling me without being explicit that they simply don't feel like they have to prove anything and it doesn't matter how badly the clinical trials were done. They're smarter than God and reality and that's how I'm supposed to take it according to them. Do you ever ponder just how offensive that is, how soul-sucking a kind of attack this is on me personally and on humanity in general? Even now, a few good people could turn this Earthly situation around, but people like Bells WANT to be in the way of that, to profit either from enjoying the view, or from gathering the money, or from being one of those who just monkeys with things and gets off from the disturbance that she causes. People like that don't even make good animals because animals that are that unplugged from reality don't survive.

 

So, later, I'm at the pool hall and Sauna comes up and he's like "aaahhh" and I'm like "yeah, whatever!"

 

Oh, that's "all" you said? I've "opened your eyes"? You're every bit as phony as I thought you were and in some way you are a very active participant in the continued degradation of this world. Do you think that I am an idiot who doesn't remember just a little while ago in this thread when you started insulting me first?

 

This is so thoroughly disgusting.

 

You want to babble about immorality? Here's your immorality:

This is how you would like to treat me, Bells, and so would your buddy the Monkey. Just lock out the dissenting opinion and say bad things about people because somehow you get something out of AIDS, even if it is just the personal satisfaction of feeling that somehow you are right and the other person is wrong, something that people will kill for.

The NIH has given careers to liars and taken careers away from people like Duesberg who tell the truth. You wouldn't happen to work for them, would you?

 

Celia Farber: "Moral zeal rather than scientific skepticism defines the field"

 

Your "morality" requires that I give up something that I enjoy just because you might be right, and you know what, you're not good enough for that. The whole AIDS establishment is not good enough for that, because the moment that anyone expressed any doubts about their hypothesis, they started calling him dirty names, denied him funding, screwed him around on his job, and they proved that they were just the kind of dismal persons that no one should take any direction from.

"Just in case"? FORGET IT. I've seen how low your standards are for believing what you want to believe, and how far you would try to make critics go and still not gain any mileage with you, and this is because you simply do not WANT to believe anything other than "HIV causes AIDS and kills all its victims and it's because someone had sex and I didn't say that they could do it that way." It's your version of requiring that every living being ask your kind permission before having a LIFE.

 

http://www.harpers.org/OutOfControl.html

This is the definition of "AIDS" in Africa.

 

Bells and anyone else:
Please stop replying and let the topic die out.

 

Bells, you may be beginning to understand how I feel about the way that you talk to me and about me.

 

Agreed.

Furthermore, I suggest we all add MetaKron and Sauna to our respective ignore lists. That way, we're not bothered by their bullshit, and they'll learn to stop.

 

Also, Bells, I said that people who do like you do might need to be treated a certain way. Now, if you want to play the game of taking that personally, I might want to play the game that when you say my stance is immoral, you advocate my receiving 100 lashes with a cane for being immoral because that's the punishment in some parts of the world. I did suggest that you should be treated as a disreputable type of salesperson, and that treatment definitely seems to be appropriate in your case. If I didn't already know something about the execrably bad education that is to be had in many parts of America, I would think that you could not possibly be so badly trained as to be making the kinds of replies that you do unawares. People are trained as a habit these days, as if it is valid science, to twist things up the way I see you doing just in message #568.

Duesberg is not the one denying things out of pride and arrogance. He has the right information. The people who deny his case are very arrogant, although the pride part may not be there. Their denials also usually take the form that "he's a psychopath" and "he will kill millions" without any information to support that denial. The arrogance part is like the way that you seem to say that you don't have to provide any support for your statements. This is the kind of thing that is done by swindlers.

 

Considering the fact that you never say anything of substance, it won't be a loss if you do it.

 

Bells, if you had anything like the substance it should take, you simply wouldn't be talking the way that you do. I can tell a lot from your speech patterns. I can also tell a lot from the way that you expect to be nasty to me and get away with it while it's a capital crime for me to say anything that offends you. You also pretend to feel threatened when there is no threat, and once again, that makes me wonder about your honesty.