The Rabbit Hole

TheVIsitor:

No, I do not gnash my teeth over anything.

You claimed there were genetic research being done...then claimed there was no proof left. If there is no proof left, how do you know about it? Were you privy to it when it was going on? Do you have evidence of it?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Stryder:

Interesting website that you linked me to. I will pursue reading about it more fully.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

It's much more than that.
That's why I said they've got "something for everybody" coming.

You don't like God and Angels, ....perhaps you would be better suited to worshiping aliens and UFOs.

That's how this started remember?

http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1234140&postcount=2

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The genetic research I said there was little evidence left of is the life extension research....
"TeloVector" with Cryogenic Solutions labs.....http://www.bio.net/bionet/mm/ageing/1998-July/003193.html

That is two different things.

The Human Genome Project was finished at the same Los Alamos, and Livermore research labs that built the Atom Bomb.
That is no secret to anyone.

 

The Visitor:

You say the process was finished ten years ago. And then you say that there is no records of any research or patents at all.

How then do you know?

Moreover, what is your point in regards to Los Alamos? It is one of the foremost laboratories in the world.

 

didn't you say it started when saint john was standing on the isle of whatever?

to be honest what you are describing sounds more like some rightwing religious nut. you can take that any way you want to.

i ask you how these "they" was going to select a person according to their dna and you haven't explained how.

you haven't provided any evidence for what you are saying, you even say it's your opinion.
good luck to ya.

 

it's no big secret:
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=nanotechnology and immortality&hl=en

 

Did you misunderstand something?

I explained it so a child could not err therein.

Your video is all about nanobots and cryogenics.
Not what I'm talking about at all.
The real research is done.

And society will have to be completely restructured before it is released.

I'd say a few thousand twenty megaton warheads will "restructure" society quite nicely wouldn't you?

That's what it has to do with your "foremost research" labs.

The very same labs did the Manhattan project, and the Human Genome project.

 

well let's see.
a worlwide conspiracy is going to target certain people according to their dna.
the targeted people will die.
the rest will live forever.

is that about it?

 

Thy contradictions doth discredit thine views.

 

yes, i would say it would restructure society quit nicely, not to mention making the planet uninhabitable for an ungodly length of time.

so, where are these "survivors" going to hid out while the planet shudders in the midst of a nuclear winter?

 

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Where will "they" hide?.......they won't.


This mushroom cloud was 25 miles high.
It was a 10 megaton blast.
Russian nukes are 20 megaton.

"Burned with fire, and hailstones a talent apeice in size fall."
Sounds nuclear to me.....
I've been a midwestern stormchaser for years, an updraft much smaller than this produces softball size hail.

I beleive the destruction will stop short of becoming worldwide.
There will be whole nations of survirors.....to see firsthand the wrath of a jealous God, and remember.

That's what this last forty years have been all about, "a nation's space to repent"
It's the same way all through the bible, after rejecting their day of "visitation".

The second coming is long past, and the churches of Babylon...the great harlot, Rome, and her daughters, the Protestants rejected Him when He came.

Now they are primed to accept the counterfit when it comes.
I am still talking about the same subject.

 

This fucking site IS the fucking rabbit hole.

 

I find religion is more Pseudo(lackof)science than anything else and would probably suggest removing those sub-forums altogether if there weren't so many cultist nut jobs willing to cause trouble over it.

Unfortunately they need somewhere to vent, otherwise they plot stupid ways of forwarding their religions like blowing up buildings or proving how stereotyped they've become.

This thread in itself is what would be classed as a 'String' theory, not in the sense of Physics but in the sense that every piece that one poster is trying to write is pretty much leading him onto another piece. It's a bit like a giant brainstorm, however the problem with it is that contains logical fallacies.

Although a String, it's more of a house of cards. If any of the afore mentioned theories could be disproven to the poster with supporting evidence he is willing to accept then there might be the likelihood of bringing his overall chain of theorems into a rethink.

I know for the most part the usual methods are carried by people in regards to such people, the "Show us the evidence" clause, however rarely people that entangled within their own string of theorems is going to be capable of hunting for that information as they will be too tied up with their own "relevant" perceptions, so they do indeed need a hand when it comes to evidence gathering.

It should also be noted that if you are taking a truly Philosophical approach to debate or evidence gathering that you need to look at both sides, arguing both points even if you only believe in one side of the argument. This is so you have a better understanding of the subject at hand.

Mod note
I am tempted to close the thread on the premise that it's ambiguous nature makes it very difficult for new and old posters alike to post on topic. I will not do it just yet however to let you the posters decide the fate of this thread (If it is closed the initial poster can restart a new thread, But I would suggest only looking at a 'Pearl of wisdom' rather than trying to cover a whole neckless, since people can only handle things in bite sized portions.)

 

Experts warn of an accidental atomic war.

Nuclear missile modified for conventional attack on Iran could set off alarm in Russia.
Eric Rosenberg, Hearst Newspapers.....Friday, October 6, 2006

Mixing conventional and nuclear D5s on a U.S. Trident submarine "would be very dangerous," Podvig said, because the Russians have no way of discriminating between the two types of missiles once they are launched.

Russian President Vladimir Putin warned that the project would increase the danger of accidental nuclear war.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/10/06/MNGF9LJSMM1.DTL

Here is something else for you to read.

http://www.newswithviews.com/Yates/steven6.htm

Someone else has a red pill for you to take.....

I only read the first two parts so I'm not endorsing this by any means, but he seemed to have done some of the homework.
The bible mentions the ten horns that are moved to give their power to the beast for one hour.
That's about 41 years in scriptural time.

REVELATION 17:12
And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.
REVELATION 17:13
These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.

REVELATION 17:16
And the ten horns which thou sawest upon the beast, these shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire.

REVELATION 17:17
For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled.

I've been attacked, cited, ticketed or whatever they call it for......meaningless content and "preaching".

That is not my purpose here really......just showing you what was already laying out there.
Does the majority of people reading this think it is meaningless content?
I think not.

Resistance is to be expected.
However my problem is not with the moderators here.
I appreciated the comment Stryder made about too much information, and I agree with that.
I hope someone gets what I've tried to say here.....
There is a lot more I'm not saying, that you'll have to find out for yourselves.

The Journey is the reward.
TheVisitor

 

HAHAHA fantastic. Someone actually created this link. wow. how sad.

 

you've made some good posts in this thread visitor.
trying to understand what you are saying is making my brain hurt.
can you clarify a little?

 

Can I clarify a little?
What part?

 

Maybe this will clarify somewhat.....
"With flames from the dragon of darkness, the sunlight blinds his eyes."

What I'm speaking of is a reveleation of something.

It's the "Battle of Evermore"
"The sky is filled with good and bad that mortals never know."

I'm not the first...or the only one, who has glimpsed what I'm talking about.

This post I wrote for someone else today could clarify some more perhaps.....
To keep from repeating, it is here;
http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1254451&postcount=414

 

Can we have a rule in Pseudoscience to the effect that "Thou shalt not invoke God to 'prove' your hypotheses"?

Some of the pseudoscience topics might merit actual research, but when people bring in God it just makes the subject into a funding repulsion field.