Talk:To Do List
From sciforums_encyclopedia
- What about the Great Logo Debate?
- I dont mind summing that up. Though some of the images has dissappeared off image hosting sites......Nickelodeon 04:04, 15 March 2007 (EST)
- Initiated Nickelodeon 19:05, 17 March 2007 (EST)
- it looks a bit cluttered. Could they be grouped or separated in some way? Perhaps some details as to who designed each?
- No need. the thread is there for all to see who did what. I just wanted the pictures only, i.e. cutting out the crap.
- You are going on a dangerous path; cutting out all the crap. You are one step away from untrolling yourself. Spuriousmonkey 03:54, 20 March 2007 (EST)
- Besides, shouldnt all this chatter be on the logo discussion page? Nickelodeon 04:18, 20 March 2007 (EST)
- No need. the thread is there for all to see who did what. I just wanted the pictures only, i.e. cutting out the crap.
- it looks a bit cluttered. Could they be grouped or separated in some way? Perhaps some details as to who designed each?
- Initiated Nickelodeon 19:05, 17 March 2007 (EST)
- What about sciforum poster rules?
- Yes I know we are a lapse lot and rules don't always apply, however people always asked "What are the rules" and well nobody could ever point them to any real ones. --Stryder 16:19, 24 March 2007 (EST)
Develop a mutually agreeable resolution to the issue of revert wars on articles about SciForums members.
- Haven't we reached an agreeable resolution by banning the foreign insurgent in this war?Spuriousmonkey 07:58, 28 March 2007 (EST)
- I thought it was a general comment on articles about SciForums members. Nickelodeon 08:16, 28 March 2007 (EST)
- is it? who wrote that comment. Please come forward and identify yourself. Spuriousmonkey 08:40, 28 March 2007 (EST)
- It was Pete, the voice of reason Nickelodeon 08:44, 28 March 2007 (EST)
- is it? who wrote that comment. Please come forward and identify yourself. Spuriousmonkey 08:40, 28 March 2007 (EST)
- dam you pete and your voice of reason. YOu made us confused! Spuriousmonkey 08:56, 28 March 2007 (EST)
- I send pete a PM. Spuriousmonkey 09:08, 28 March 2007 (EST)
- The idea was to have some kind of accepted practice, not necessarily formal. Wikipedia has a three revert rule, for example, after which the article should go through Wikipedia's arbitration process (however that works).
- So I guess the question is... what is "accepted practice" when it comes to editing Sciforums member pages?
- What about User pages? - Pete 21:34, 28 March 2007 (EST)
