Difference between revisions of "Talk:Invert nexus"

Latest revision as of 22:45, 14 March 2007

Who are those most who believe IN to be homo, and does it really matter enough to mention in sciwiki? --Avatar 08:18, 6 March 2007 (EST)

yes, because it is a popular notion by Christians that homosexuals have brain damage. Spuriousmonkey 08:19, 6 March 2007 (EST)

It was a joke, of course, and a somewhat funny one. It'll do until I find time (if ever) to write up something about myself that is better. Or unless someone else does. If anything, I think most people think I'm a bit perverted, not homosexual (although homosexuality can be seen as a type of perversion, it's not one that is commonly associated with me as far as I know.) I do wonder who Hugh Jass was... I'm wondering if it was Phonetic. Whoever he was STARTED with me, and I already defiled Phonetic's user page... Hmmm. Invert nexus 21:23, 6 March 2007 (EST)

We need a topic on brain damage. :D --Avatar 08:21, 6 March 2007 (EST)

i started a page on IceAgeCivilization. Spuriousmonkey 08:23, 6 March 2007 (EST)

Since when did he have a brain? Nickelodeon 08:22, 11 March 2007 (EST)

he had one before his mummie dropped him a few times as a baby. Spuriousmonkey 08:23, 11 March 2007 (EST)

I really can't wait 'til Invert writes us some serious scientific articles. No, honestly: I really can't. I'll be long-dead in the year 2341. redarmy11 09:25, 11 March 2007 (EST)

but it will be worth the wait! Spuriousmonkey 09:28, 11 March 2007 (EST)

Oh yes it will, my brothers. Oh yes it will.... Invert nexus 17:27, 11 March 2007 (EST)