User:Invert nexus

From sciforums_encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Invert nexus exists.

what's an inverted nexus?

Answer: A nexus is a junction where things come together. Therefore, an invert nexus is a junction where things come apart. It is a reference to my predilection towards taking things apart to examine their inner workings.

"examine the inner workings"... is that like examining the sensual erotic parts?

He is a total waste of spacetime. He has no cinsideration for others, and totally self-indulgant. I don't know why anyone gives this fickle sentient the time of day.

Heh. Another one. Can I help it if I say it like it is? You're a horrible writer, Reiku. Surely this isn't a shock to you. If so, then you should spend some time in serious self-reflection. Not only this, but you need to understand that this is a wiki. Not your personal blog. Invert nexus 22:54, 27 October 2007 (EDT)

Well, all due respect OH NEXUS, you are a total loser and freak. I cannot stand you. I don't like your attitude, your general comments or even your overall fuckin appearance: In summery, i don't like the cut of your jig. You have hounded me since i ever came here. I wish you would ge and entertain yourself - leave me alone. My writing, is not affected by your insignificant ramblings. Nor will it ever be. My work has been recognized in the past, and to this day with good understanding. So piss off.

  • Dear InvertNexus and Reiku, let it be known to you that it will be best of you to not be hostile towards each other as this life is short and it exists for us to make peace not war.

Well, I don't personally give a fuck about you one way or the other. I'm sorry you can't take honest criticism. I suppose you must have a very small penis. Meanwhile, you're misrepresenting the facts to say that I've "hounded you" since you arrived. I hardly interact with you. You are obviously delusional if you feel that I've been doing more than bumping into you upon occasion. As to your writing, please learn to spell at the very least. Learning about how to format your writing in a nearly legible form would also do wonders. I won't even speak as to the cargo cult quality of your scribblings (oops. I just did.) Anyway. Calm down. Your 'work' is still present on that page. It's just been formatted a bit more into how a wiki is supposed to look. Feel lucky that I don't have the motivation to go clean up all your 'articles' as they are all horribly written. I love you. Invert nexus 00:20, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

My penis size? Is this the best you can do? Not that its any buisiness of yours, but i've never had a problem or an issue in that department. And yes, you have hounded me [on any particular weakness] - nothing to do with criticism. I can take criticism, or i would be on places like this. Instead, when i said i found math difficult, and is NOT my strongest area, and you mocked me. Now this is my turn. Give and take my inverted prick.

Heh. It's your turn. Ok. Whatever you say, buddy boy. Invert nexus 00:45, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

What's wrong... loosing consistency in your arguement?

Are you for real? If so, my god... Delusional, indeed. Invert nexus 01:01, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

Whatever: You are now even more inverted than before.

Ooooooh. And you, sir, are more Reiku than blah blah blah. Wow, man. You're getting me good. I'm like crying and stuff over here. I give in, man. I'll do anything if you only stop hurling misspelled words at me! Mercy! Invert nexus 01:15, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

I'd like to hurl a great deal more at you, than arbitrary misspelled words you missdirected fool.

I'm sure you would. Now, redirect your attention to your own writings and perhaps you'll actually get somewhere. For instance, what is the purpose of the phrase "arbitrarily misspelled words"? Which use of 'arbitrary' are you aiming at? Please choose from the following list: 1. subject to individual will or judgment without restriction; contingent solely upon one's discretion: an arbitrary decision. 2. decided by a judge or arbiter rather than by a law or statute. 3. having unlimited power; uncontrolled or unrestricted by law; despotic; tyrannical: an arbitrary government. 4. capricious; unreasonable; unsupported: an arbitrary demand for payment. 5. Mathematics. undetermined; not assigned a specific value: an arbitrary constant. –noun 6. arbitraries, Printing. (in Britain) peculiar (def. 9). Invert nexus 01:45, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

Arbitrary, in the sense that the words, being spelled correctly or not, does not delete the general information or goal. So in a sense, it is you who is being generally arbitrary, over such silly nonesense. If people can read my work, and understand my work, then why should a parrot like you change anything?

I'm sorry. Which definition was that? It didn't seem to be a definition for the word 'arbitrary'. Do they speak english in what? Invert nexus 01:58, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

None of the above.

So. What you're saying is that you're not speaking english at all? That would explain a lot. Invert nexus 01:10, 28 October 2007 (EST)

I might as well be talking in another language than to waste my invaluable time debating this utter shit with you.

I was a bit rushed for time last night on my last comment. Let's resume, shall we? Upon a re-read of your explanation of your use of the term 'arbitrary' I see that you have latched on to definition #2. That I am being an arbiter of your writing style. Now, this would actually be a good use of the word had you only meant it that way, but we both know that you didn't mean it that way. Don't we? And, even if you did, you used it incorrectly as you applied arbitrary to the misspelled word, not to me. You claimed with your phrase "arbitrary misspelled words" that the misspelled words were somehow arbitrary. Now. A word cannot be arbitrary as it has no will. You will see from the list of definitions above that in all cases except for the mathematical definition the key element is will. Choice. A choice made not through logic. Not through purpose. But, rather, just pointing your finger at a spot and saying 'there'. So. How can a word be arbitrary? It can't. It has no will. However, the word can be arbitrarily (note the 'ly' which means that this is an adverb and thus adjusts the verb 'misspelled') misspelled. However, if this is what you meant, then you would be telling me that you have been purposefully misspelling words, but doing so in a haphazard fashion. Picking words, not quite at random but close, to misspell while spelling others correctly. You would thus be taking the title of 'arbitrary' upon yourself as you are the one who is hurling the 'arbitrarily misspelled words'. If you have another explanation for your phrase, then please. Let's hear it. Personally, I think you just like saying words that you've heard spoken by the intelligentsia despite your not understanding the meaning. Thus, the cargo cult. Invert nexus 16:47, 28 October 2007 (EST)

this is probably the best page on this encyclopedia? just a cunt

Those articles do need formating, who on Earth thinks they look better as they are?????? Nickelodeon 07:28, 28 October 2007 (EST)

James R.
People with small penises? Invert nexus 16:47, 28 October 2007 (EST)

Oh. Well as long as a grown up adult thinks so then thats OK. I'm off to the playground. If you need me I'll be on the swings. Nickelodeon 08:13, 28 October 2007 (EST)

it's past your bedtime. Here in australia we think that letting children go to the playground at this time is irresponsible and childish James R

As i said, Nexus, i am not going to waste any more of my time on this. Or you.

Actually, i'll take that back. You said: That I am being an arbiter of your writing style. Now, this would actually be a good use of the word had you only meant it that way, but we both know that you didn't mean it that way. Don't we? Actually yes, ofcourse i mean't it in this sense. What other fuckin sense would i mean it in, as it couldn't be anymore obvious than your stinkin attitude :-) Graditude for your time, twat.

Then you used it, as I pointed out quite clearly, incorrectly. I repeat, you don't speakuh the english. A pity you're so damned defensive. Oh well. Your loss. Continue writing like shit. No skin off my nose. Invert nexus 00:12, 29 October 2007 (EST)

Then in that case, i will present my case on the forum. If my work is found to be shit, then i will cease interacting here, then you will have won your pointless and annoying debate.

Reiku honey. this is a wiki. Not a forum. Anyone has the right to edit anything. James Blunt

James... i know, honey. He just doesn't have to be so damned nasty about it. I don't have a problem with criticism: It is personal attacks i have no time for.

Then you are at the wrong forum.

I didn't realize that forums had hate tagged on them...

It's official policy on sciforums. The administration is leading by example.

Wow, welcome to the discussion James Blunt, how nice of you to take out the time to speak to us. - Eddie Murphy

Eddie!! I'm your biggest fan! I have all your records! James Blunt

Thank James. Its nice to be appreciated for something other than my acting and comedy. So what is your interest in Black Holes? - Eddie Murphy

In the forums, you can write however you want. It's your 'work' there. Here, it's a wiki. And, me get nasty? Who's calling who names? I simply gave honest criticism and you got offended. Invert nexus 07:32, 29 October 2007 (EST)

Maybe i got offended because i'm not a self-centered prick. A lot of people today don't care what other people think, because they are so up their own asses. You know what, i don't care whether you changed my work or not. Please, go right ahead. But in the future, don't get as personal to say, Your writing is terrible, because those words where choiciest, just to inentionally get unde my skin.

But your writing is terrible. - Non Logical Guy

Huh? Nickelodeon 10:00, 29 October 2007 (EST)

Louis... please don't feed the fish.

I fucking hate deliberate incorrect spelling. Its so obnoxious. - Non Logical Guy

In fact, i've just caught you out Spurio. I know it's you... stop it monkey boy!!

spuriousmonkey, that was despicable. I hope you get banned for doing that. I'm reporting you to Plazma. Nickelodeon 11:04, 29 October 2007 (EST)
not as despicable as your childish behaviour! I reported to James R. Spuriousmonkey 12:05, 29 October 2007 (EST)
Good. I hope he shoves it up his STD riddled anus. - Child
Reiku? Since you're apparently seeking others' opinions on this, I'll offer mine. Your writing is shit. You need to use a spell-checker, learn what paragraphs are, learn to be succinct. Mr. Nexus has been trying to help you in this and you've chosen to throw his advice back in his face. This, I'm afraid, makes you an idiot. - redarmy11
He's looking for opinions on this? OK heres mine: Reiku, your writing is bloody shit. You need to learn how to spell and for fucks sake learn what a wiki is. Unless of course you dont really want an opinion, in which case you can shove this message up my colon. I will certainly enjoy it. Nickelodeon 16:15, 29 October 2007 (EST)
we say idoit on a serious sceince forum Al Gore

Why should i take anything that is said here seriously, when this site is riddled with identity theifs?? Or is it just one?

what do you mean? reiku
Oh come on spurio... your one of them, if not, them..
Why should a person's tendency to indulge in (cough) identity theft invalidate their criticisms of your terrible writing, Reiku? - redarmy11
when I want to ban someone I always check the page history to see who has done what and focus on people who I don't like. James R

Redarmy... you don't even contribute any sciences here -- - -- Or if you have, you have been very friggin quiet since i got here... what makes you think i care what you have to say? Spurio and yourself have been nothing but irritants since i've been here.

Why should a person's tendency to 'not contribute any sciences here' invalidate their criticisms of your terrible writing, Reiku? - redarmy11

excuse me. I'm the first person to get a RAD reward on sciforums. spuriouscunt

Spurious... go back to sleep.

Redarmy... i talk about nothing but science half the time, and you think you're qualified to make any suggestions or so-called criticisms?

Reiku... yes: your writing 'style' sucks; your spelling sucks; your grasp of sentence and paragraph construction suck. Few, I'd imagine, would be interested in reading anything you have to say on the subject of science because of this. - redarmy11

it's only noon here.

Well then... little would you know. I've had discussions with experts around the world, sometimes involving my work... and i've never had any complaints. Never.

Probably because you sent it to Comedy Central. They probably turned it into a sitcom. Or they just had a good laugh.- John Stewart

Yes you have. Welcome back to Earth.

And you say my standard use of English is wrong. And yet, you cannot keep up on any debate without it reverting back to you. Or Nexus. I've had enough. I think i've milked this for as much as can be attained.

Your phrasing there: "my standard use of English". Awkward. Your capitalisation: inconsistent. And where did I mention me?

Consider then, that your childish rebellion has successful..

I regularly review scientific work for proper science journals. That is I decide if it is worthy for publication and assess the quality of the writing and experimental setup. Do you want my opinion? Spuriousmonkey 05:43, 30 October 2007 (EST)

If you don't mind me saying so Spurious, i've seen no evidence of you actually being a biological scientist, other than superfluous spammings of spunk posts. It doesn't matter now. As i have said, you won. Bye. Oh.. and if you even are... then you still aren't qualified. I speak of astrophysics. Not biology.

is that a yes or no?