From sciforums_encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Sigh. No comparable wikipedia article. :rolleyes: redarmy11 03:11, 12 March 2007 (EST)

If there was I'd have no respect for wikipedia. 03:13, 12 March 2007 (EST)Nickelodeon 03:13, 12 March 2007 (EST)
and it is a pretty dam good article. Spuriousmonkey 03:13, 12 March 2007 (EST)
I agree. But what's that got to do with it? redarmy11 03:14, 12 March 2007 (EST)
almost nothing. I just like to see myself on top of the recent changes list. hence i keep making minor changes like this.Spuriousmonkey 03:15, 12 March 2007 (EST)
Yes me too. Oh, and the first word in the above sentences is are redundant. redarmy11 04:19, 12 March 2007 (EST)
i was in a tiassa mood. Spuriousmonkey 04:38, 12 March 2007 (EST)

All right, so does that mean you lot like it or don't? =/

Your work, Geoff? Yes, we like, we like. More, my friend. redarmy11 15:41, 12 March 2007 (EST)

Thankee. *bows* Well, his website's back up, but I'm afraid to expand or someone might buy his books.

Happeh, quit vandalizing your own wiki page. This is for your own good.

Hoo hoo! Protected page! Very nice! GeoffP