From sciforums_encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Find here, preserved for posterity, mine and Nickelodeon's discussion on this subject, which I've lifted wholesale from the history of the Main Page (and edited slightly for clarity). Note my increasingly cool-headed, calmly-argued responses to Nickelodeon's increasing hysteria. Enjoy the debate - redarmy11 03:55, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

  • we who are about to shit salute you! Spuriousmonkey 03:57, 27 May 2007 (EDT)

Welcome, encyclopedophiles.

Why do you keep changing this warm welcome to our encyclopaedia enthusiasts, Avatar? It really is most annoying. redarmy11 08:50, 11 March 2007 (EST)

I am the gate! I am the key! Erm, what? Sorry, too much Lovecraft. Ummm, changing, yes, I find that any visitor greeted as a child fucking creep is offensive. --Avatar 08:53, 11 March 2007 (EST)

WHAT!?? How very, very, very, very DARE you!!! I am going to change it back you know. I find it etymologically appealing. redarmy11 08:57, 11 March 2007 (EST)

"Welcome, puny humans?" Nickelodeon 17:34, 11 March 2007 (EST)
I like 'puny humans'. --Avatar 17:43, 11 March 2007 (EST)
We don't. It's extremely temporary. redarmy11 07:16, 12 March 2007 (EST)
There is no way we can welcome Paedophiles Nickelodeon 17:56, 12 March 2007 (EST)

duh. obviously. we're welcoming encyclopedophiles - people who love encyclopedias. like this one. now what the hell's wrong with that!??? - redarmy11 17:58, 12 March 2007 (EST)

Too close. Its practically the same. Nickelodeon 18:00, 12 March 2007 (EST)
but it's not though. they mean something completely different. and yet sound the same. it's a stroke of evil brilliance on my part. why do you morons always hold me back? you'll all regret it one day. you'll see. oh, you'll see.. <evil mumbling..> - redarmy11 18:06, 12 March 2007 (EST)

<So, anyway, I left it a while... then put it back how it ought to be - redarmy11>

Thought you could sneak that one past us hey Red? Nickelodeon 09:28, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
  • it's kind of annoying if people edit the entire page instead of the subsection so you can actually immediately see where the modification was.Spuriousmonkey 09:32, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
  • Oh yeah. Nickelodeon 12:23, 16 May 2007 (EDT)
  • It was up there, baldly abusing newcomers, for a full 24 hours <Grin>. And I still don't see anything wrong with it. What are people who love encyclopaedias called? :confused: redarmy11
Well they arent called paedophilles!! Nickelodeon 03:39, 17 May 2007 (EDT)
No, because they're called encyclopedophiles. So stfu. redarmy11

In the words of Avatar, I find that any visitor greeted as a child fucking creep is offensive. Nickelodeon 10:27, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

And I find that neither you nor that fucker Avatar have any grasp whatsoever of elementary fucking English. At least he's got an excuse - he's fucking Latvian or something. What's yours? redarmy11
Blimey. That sounded much angrier than intended. Heh. Oh well. redarmy11
My excuse is that I loath child molesters. Nickelodeon 17:31, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
Am I speaking Senegalese or something here? Pedophile: A child molester. Bad. Encyclopedophile: One who loves encyclopedias. Good!!!. What is the bleeding, pigging problem!??!!?!?!?!!!?!?????? - redarmy11
An encyclopedia of peadophiles! Nickelodeon 04:36, 22 May 2007 (EDT)
WHAT pedophiles!??? What the JESUS TITTY FUCKING CHRIST are you on about!!??? Where are these 'pedophiles' you keep banging on about - are they in your bastard head!??? This is FRENZIED AND HYSTERICAL MOB-THINKING!!! Have you ever been to Wales!??? Don't make me start a thread on this. I bastard will you know!!! - redarmy11
the discussion on this page is really difficult to follow. maybe we should start with a clean slate.xev