From sciforums_encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

M00se1989 is a completely fictional character spawned from "nowhere" but lives in a computer dominated society. He believes donkeys will float out of the ass end of particle colliders if and only if you shoot donkey DNA as radiation directly into a space filled using nanotechnology with only a single atom of each element from the periodic table. He lives in an alternate reality to our dimension and should be considered an alien to all things considering life, such as good philosophy. He also believes that tsolkas is always right but then asks what's to the left. before tsolkas answers m00se1989 says, "Einstein duh". In this society there is a multitude of people caught playing this game called "infinite monkey theory" where each monkey attempts to reach the golden banana before the first one. These monkeys are fans of Shakespeare such as John from Brave New World, but they have no idea how to type. This is an odd thought as their inability to type leads them only to not be able to read the Shakespeare they so desperately love. As m00se1989 runs through his reality he delves too deep into philosophy as sees what the other monkeys are doing wrong in their quest for the golden banana. Such as in the Art of War they have a ring around their head which tightens as well as loosens. So instead of giving way to infinite monkey theorem m00se1989 has decided to pull on the rings of the other monkeys through the use of the typewriter. He smashes the keyboard writing in caps all the time like his word salad means "something" and makes all the other monkeys angry by typing values into their society that do not compute or amount to anything at all. This random action and sequence of numbers as well as letters confuses the monkeys and makes their rings easier to find. So within a ring of monkeys all he has to do is pull the ring leaders ring in order to ring his bell and allow for all the other monkeys to make their own Shakespeare inn a language understood by all. In doing this he will "almost certainly" teach the other monkeys how to type and philosophize at the same time. But, lets not forget he is a completely fictional character whose catch-phrase is "m00se is the name, psychology is the game, but don't be lured by my banter, it is only a little canter"


If we could dispense with wars, so much the better. I can imagine more profitable uses for the twelve billion now paid annualy for the armed peace we have in Europe; there are other means of winning respect for physiology than field hospitals.- Good; very good even: since the old God is abolished, I am prepared to rule THE WORLD-"(Friedrich Neitzsche"

Why I am not a troll.

Trolling is a game about identity deception, albeit one that is played without the consent of most of the players. The troll attempts to pass as a legitimate participant, sharing the group's common interests and concerns; the newsgroups members, if they are *cognizant* of trolls and other identity deceptions, attempt to both distinguish real from trolling postings, and upon judging a poster a troll, make the offending poster leave the group. Their success at the former depends on how well they — and the troll — understand identity cues; their success at the latter depends on whether the troll's *enjoyment* is sufficiently diminished or outweighed by the costs imposed by the group. Trolls can be costly in several ways. A troll can disrupt the discussion on a newsgroup, disseminate bad advice, and damage the feeling of trust in the newsgroup community. Furthermore, in a group that has become sensitized to trolling — where the rate of deception is high — many honestly naïve questions may be quickly rejected as trollings. This can be quite off-putting to the new user who upon venturing a first posting is immediately bombarded with angry accusations. Even if the accusation is unfounded, being branded a troll is quite damaging to one's online reputation.

Because I have made "one general contribution" in the form of an experiment, and because my enjoyment is never going to be deminished away from the psychology involved within identity cues. AKA. It takes one to know one. Not only am I understanding of identiy cues, but I use emotional cues in the face of opposition to point out bias being presented. It is important to recognize the difference as emotional cues present someone's true beliefs over a subject.

"A concern troll is a false flag pseudonym created by a user whose actual point of view is opposed to the one that the user claims to hold. The concern troll posts in web forums devoted to its declared point of view and attempts to sway the group's actions or opinions while claiming to share their goals, but with professed "concerns". The goal is to sow fear, uncertainty and doubt within the group."

So If I made a name called the troll I really wouldn't be one. I hate the uncertainty principal, and (unlike sociopathic trolls) I am here for empathy not fear, which is a group effort. You see what you want to see in my words, that is how psychology works. I only play along with a persons fantacies. Provide encouragement when others say no. I give the smartest minds something to stare at for their emotional opposition. This word called troll is a baseless assumption. I am the one who will believe anything. The one who is gullible enough to think that way, but I am pulled off of peoples fantacies by emotional cues. I feel only sorrow for those who do not understand the purpose of my arguements. If I make someone misserable it is only an effort to dispatch my own missery that has accumulated in my short life.

Here the one thing you have never before had in your life. If you think your smart find someone who is hopeless and give them a multiple choice question. That contains a choice only of pure belief. If I were to arrange M+N of every element to iron as to accumulate 351 atoms (or the relative amount) into the same area, so that there is one hydrogen, two heliums, three lithiums and so on...

A: I could use uranuim as the outer layer fill the rest with hydrogen and use a lead tamper to make the strongest and cleanest implosion nuclear weapon ever. (Badder than Tsar Bomba and smaller without the design flaws of the telluriam design)

B: Place the object into a glass jar where it would exibit PhotoElectric (not to be confused with photovoltaic) properties.

C: place it into the Cerebrospinal fluid of a person to ensure that their cognitive functions never cease, (could also decrease the limitations of an EEG machine)

D: help complete Russias proposed joint project for deep space travel (space flight)

E: Final choice. Keep talking like I am ignorant after you have had immortality, space flight core power, and ultimate destruction accurately explained to you in very simple english.

What is even less evident will be that as time moves on anyone to suggest an idea such as this will instantly and obviously look like this troll. and we will never get to see what happens to the object in a particle collider. Never get to see it in our hand. and most certainly never see it spinning above our poles. It records and transmits information at a frightening pace considering its size. its a battery for almost any device. It does absolutely EVERYTHING. To take it from metaphysics to physics implies building it. Still the second you do, it becomes metaphysics again.